(a) Authority. The regulation in this part, known as Regulation E, is issued by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System pursuant to the Electronic Fund Transfer Act (15 U.S.C. 1693 et seq.). The information-collection requirements have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. and have been assigned OMB No. 7100-0200.
(b) Purpose. This part carries out the purposes of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, which establishes the basic rights, liabilities, and responsibilities of consumers who use electronic fund transfer services and of financial institutions that offer these services. The primary objective of the act and this part is the protection of individual consumers engaging in electronic fund transfers.
Notes of Decisions
Stegall v. Peoples Bank of Cuba, 270 S.W.3d 500 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
· cites it 5× “” 12 C.F.R. Section 205.1. Section 205.12 goes on to set forth four standards for determining whether state law is inconsistent with the requirements of the EFTA and Regulation E.”
Noble v. Am. Nat'l Prop., 297 F. Supp. 3d 998 (2018).
“§ 1693b; see 12 C.F.R. § 205.1 . The Board has promulgated rules related to issuance of access devices, preauthorized transfers and many other areas.”
Cobb v. PayLease LLC, 34 F. Supp. 3d 976 (D. Minnesota 2014).
· cites it 2× “§ 1693b; see also 12 C.F.R. § 205.1 . The Board has promulgated administrative regulations codified at 12 C.”
Margaretha Widjaja v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 21 F.4th 579 (9th Cir. 2021).
“See 12 C.F.R. § 205.1 (a). After the Dodd-Frank Act transferred rulemaking authority to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the Bureau republished Regulation E in Part 1005 of Title 12.”
Kiley v. First Nat'l Bank, 649 A.2d 1145 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1994).
“12 C.F.R. § 205.1 . According to the EFTA, institutions must disclose certain terms and conditions, such as a summary of the consumer’s liability, important telephone numbers, the institution’s business hours, the types of transfers a customer *341 may make, and a summary of the…”
Pike v. Nick's English Hut, Inc., 937 F. Supp. 2d 956 (S.D. Ind. 2013).
· cites it 2× “, or 12 C.F.R. § 205.1 et seq.; estoppel; laches; waiver; bona fide error under 15 U.”
Johnson v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n, 276 F.R.D. 330 (D. Minnesota 2011).
“, and Regulation E, 12 C.F.R. § 205.1 , et seq. (“EFTA”). The Class Complaint alleges that Defendant U.”
Mabary v. Hometown Bank, N.A., 276 F.R.D. 196 (S.D. Tex. 2011).
“(“EFTA”), and its implementing Regulation E, 12 C.F.R. § 205.1 et seq. The section of the EFTA under which Plaintiff brings this lawsuit requires operators of automated teller machines (“ATMs”) who impose a fee in connection with electronic fund transfers to provide advance…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.