C.F.R. » Title 12 » CHAPTER II—FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM › SUBCHAPTER A—BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM › PART 220—CREDIT BY BROKERS AND DEALERS (REGULATION T)

12 C.F.R. § 220.8

Cash account

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Permissible transactions. In a cash account, a creditor, may:

(1) Buy for or sell to any customer any security or other asset if:

(i) There are sufficient funds in the account; or

(ii) The creditor accepts in good faith the customer's agreement that the customer will promptly make full cash payment for the security or asset before selling it and does not contemplate selling it prior to making such payment;

(2) Buy from or sell for any customer any security or other asset if:

(i) The security is held in the account; or

(ii) The creditor accepts in good faith the customer's statement that the security is owned by the customer or the customer's principal, and that it will be promptly deposited in the account;

(3) Issue, endorse, or guarantee, or sell an option for any customer as part of a covered option transaction; and

(4) Use an escrow agreement in lieu of the cash, cash equivalents or underlying asset position if:

(i) In the case of a short call or a short put, the creditor is advised by the customer that the required securities, assets or cash are held by a person authorized to issue an escrow agreement and the creditor independently verifies that the appropriate escrow agreement will be delivered by the person promptly; or

(ii) In the case of a call issued, endorsed, guaranteed, or sold on the same day the underlying asset is purchased in the account and the underlying asset is to be delivered to a person authorized to issue an escrow agreement, the creditor verifies that the appropriate escrow agreement will be delivered by the person promptly.

(b) Time periods for payment; cancellation or liquidation—(1) Full cash payment. A creditor shall obtain full cash payment for customer purchases:

(i) Within one payment period of the date:

(A) Any nonexempted security was purchased;

(B) Any when-issued security was made available by the issuer for delivery to purchasers;

(C) Any “when distributed” security was distributed under a published plan;

(D) A security owned by the customer has matured or has been redeemed and a new refunding security of the same issuer has been purchased by the customer, provided:

(1) The customer purchased the new security no more than 35 calendar days prior to the date of maturity or redemption of the old security;

(2) The customer is entitled to the proceeds of the redemption; and

(3) The delayed payment does not exceed 103 percent of the proceeds of the old security.

(ii) In the case of the purchase of a foreign security, within one payment period of the trade date or within one day after the date on which settlement is required to occur by the rules of the foreign securities market, provided this period does not exceed the maximum time permitted by this part for delivery against payment transactions.

(2) Delivery against payment. If a creditor purchases for or sells to a customer a security in a delivery against payment transaction, the creditor shall have up to 35 calendar days to obtain payment if delivery of the security is delayed due to the mechanics of the transaction and is not related to the customer's willingness or ability to pay.

(3) Shipment of securities, extension. If any shipment of securities is incidental to consummation of a transaction, a creditor may extend the payment period by the number of days required for shipment, but not by more than one additional payment period.

(4) Cancellation; liquidation; minimum amount. A creditor shall promptly cancel or otherwise liquidate a transaction or any part of a transaction for which the customer has not made full cash payment within the required time. A creditor may, at its option, disregard any sum due from the customer not exceeding $1000.

(c) 90 day freeze. (1) If a nonexempted security in the account is sold or delivered to another broker or dealer without having been previously paid for in full by the customer, the privilege of delaying payment beyond the trade date shall be withdrawn for 90 calendar days following the date of sale of the security. Cancellation of the transaction other than to correct an error shall constitute a sale.

(2) The 90 day freeze shall not apply if:

(i) Within the period specified in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, full payment is received or any check or draft in payment has cleared and the proceeds from the sale are not withdrawn prior to such payment or check clearance; or

(ii) The purchased security was delivered to another broker or dealer for deposit in a cash account which holds sufficient funds to pay for the security. The creditor may rely on a written statement accepted in good faith from the other broker or dealer that sufficient funds are held in the other cash account.

(d) Extension of time periods; transfers. (1) Unless the creditor's examining authority believes that the creditor is not acting in good faith or that the creditor has not sufficiently determined that exceptional circumstances warrant such action, it may upon application by the creditor:

(i) Extend any period specified in paragraph (b) of this section;

(ii) Authorize transfer to another account of any transaction involving the purchase of a margin or exempted security; or

(iii) Grant a waiver from the 90 day freeze.

(2) Applications shall be filed and acted upon prior to the end of the payment period, or in the case of the purchase of a foreign security within the period specified in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section, or the expiration of any subsequent extension.

[Reg. T, 63 FR 2825, Jan. 16, 1998]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17 cases, 1972–2014 · leading case: Jaksich v. Thomson McKinnon Sec., Inc., 582 F. Supp. 485 (S.D.N.Y. 1984).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Jaksich v. Thomson McKinnon Sec., Inc., 582 F. Supp. 485 (S.D.N.Y. 1984). · cites it 3× “Regulation T, 12 C.F.R. § 220.8 . At the time Kuznetz purchased the Reserve Oil, most of plaintiff’s money was tied up in margin accounts.”
Levitt v. J.P. Morgan Sec., Inc., 710 F.3d 454 (2d Cir. 2013). “” 12 C.F.R. § 220.8 (b)(ii)(4). The Levitt Plaintiffs argue that Bear Stearns violated Regulation T when it failed to cancel unpaid trades in Sterling Foster accounts during the ML Direct IPO.”
McDaniel v. Bear Stearns & Co., Inc., 196 F. Supp. 2d 343 (S.D.N.Y. 2002). “liability, failure to register Baron as an ‘approved person’ pursuant to NYSE requirements, violations of NYSE Rule 382, issuance of false and misleading confirmations and statements in violation of SEC Rule 10b-10 and NASD Rule 2230, breach of duty of fair dealing in violation…”
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,997 United States of Am. v. Paul Russo, Barbara Hosman, William Petrokansky, 74 F.3d 1383 (2d Cir. 1996). “The Federal Reserve Board allows brokers to request extensions for payment for stock purchases from the New York Stock Exchange pursuant to Federal Reserve Board Regulation T, 12 C.F.R. § 220.8 (d) (1995). 3 . Evans had three types of trading accounts, designated Type 1, Type 2…”
In Re LEWELLYN & CO., INC., & Gary Vance Lewellyn, Debtors. Paul R. TYLER, Tr., Appellant, v. SWISS Am. Sec., INC., Appellee, 929 F.2d 424 (8th Cir. 1991). “12 C.F.R. § 220.8 (b) (1990). 3 . The trustee also argues that the district court erred in applying the margin payment exception of section 546(e) to defeat the trustee's claim.”
Drasner v. Thomson McKinnon Sec., Inc., 433 F. Supp. 485 (S.D.N.Y. 1977). “Accordingly, the Board added a new section in 12 C.F.R. § 220.8 of Regulation T, viz. paragraph “(j)”, which is contained in the Supplement to Regulation T, and provides as follows: (j) Margin required for the writing of options.”
Dillon v. Militano, 731 F. Supp. 634 (S.D.N.Y. 1990). “5 ¶¶ 6, 14 and 44 of the complaint set out the elements of a violation 12 C.F.R. § 220.8 . Allegations are made that SSC cleared short sales knowing that the sellers did not have and could not readily obtain the securities.”
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,786 Edgar C. Fryling & Onie Fryling v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. & William Roebuck, Defendants, 593 F.2d 736 (6th Cir. 1979). “3 (b)(1), of the Regulation provides that the required margin (the cost of the security less the amount of credit which can be extended by the creditor upon initial purchase, 12 C.F.R. § 220.8 (a)) must be deposited by the customer in the margin account “before the expiration of…”
Gruntal & Co., Inc. v. San Diego Bancorp, 901 F. Supp. 607 (S.D.N.Y. 1995). · cites it 2× “SDBC alleges that Gruntal, in violation of 12 C.F.R. § 220.8 (b)(4) (“Regulation T”), 9 failed to liquidate its customers’ SDBC holdings promptly, instead holding the shares to use as leverage against SDBC.”
Manevich v. DuPont, 338 F. Supp. 1124 (S.D.N.Y. 1972). · cites it 2× “12 C.F.R. § 220.8 (e) (1) (Revised as of January 1, 1969).”
Mfrs. Hanover Trust Co. v. Drysdale Sec. Corp., 801 F.2d 13 (2d Cir. 1986). “” See 12 C.F.R. § 220.8 (a)(2). In the present case, however, Andersen has not alleged any particular regulatory violation by MHT, which, in any event, was acting not as a broker purchasing or selling securities for its customer, but as fiscal agent for an undisclosed principal,…”
Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Hansen, 726 F. Supp. 74 (S.D.N.Y. 1989). “] 12 C.F.R. § 220.8 (a)(1). 17 Regulation T also requires that a broker-dealer impose a 90-day freeze on the account of any customer who violates this provision.”
Show all 17 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.