12 C.F.R. § 229.41

Relation to State law

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The provisions of this subpart supersede any inconsistent provisions of the U.C.C. as adopted in any state, or of any other state law, but only to the extent of the inconsistency.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1995–2012 · leading case: Nbt Bank, Nat'l Ass'n v. First Nat'l Cmty. Bank, 393 F.3d 404 (1st Cir. 2004).
Nbt Bank, Nat'l Ass'n v. First Nat'l Cmty. Bank, 393 F.3d 404 (1st Cir. 2004). · cites it 3× “See 12 C.F.R. § 229.41 . Subpart C of Regulation CC, 12 C.”
Aresty Int'l Law Firm, P.C. v. Citibank, N.A., 677 F.3d 54 (1st Cir. 2012). “” See also 12 C.F.R. § 229.41 (providing that EFAA regulations supersede any inconsistent state law).”
NBT Bank NA v. First Natl Comm Bank (3rd Cir. 2004). · cites it 3× “See 12 C.F.R. § 229.41 . Subpart C of Regulation CC, 12 C.”
Bank of Am., N.A., F/K/A Nationsbank, N.A. v. First Nat'l Bank & Bancinsure, Inc. (Tex. App. 2007). “" 12 C.F.R. 229.41 (2004). Deadlines for notice of dishonor, notice of nonpayment, and the return of a check are specifically set out by Regulation CC.”
USAA Inv. Mgmt. Co. v. Fed. Reserve Bank of Boston, 906 F. Supp. 770 (D. Conn. 1995). “§ 4007 (b) (1989); Regulation CC, 12 C.F.R. § 229.41 (1994). This Court has jurisdiction over the claims and the parties, and venue in this district is proper.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.