C.F.R. » Title 12 » CHAPTER III—FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION › SUBCHAPTER A—PROCEDURE AND RULES OF PRACTICE › PART 303—FILING PROCEDURES › Subpart A—Rules of General Applicability

12 C.F.R. § 303.4

Computation of time

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

For purposes of this part, and except as otherwise specifically provided, the FDIC begins computing the relevant period on the day after an event occurs (e.g., the day after a substantially complete filing is received by the FDIC or the day after publication begins) through the last day of the relevant period. When the last day is a Saturday, Sunday or federal holiday, the period runs until the end of the next business day.

[67 FR 79247, Dec. 27, 2002, as amended at 68 FR 50459, Aug. 21, 2003]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1993–1996 · leading case: Wilbourn v. Stennett, Wilkinson & Ward
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Wilbourn v. Stennett, Wilkinson & Ward (1996) miss “§ 1817 ; 12 C.F.R. § 303.4 . By filing the change in control notice, Wilbourn made his ownership interest in CNB public knowledge.”
United States v. Schultz (1994) ca5 “§ 1817 (j) (requiring notification of changes in bank control and acceptance by the FDIC of such changes); 12 C.F.R. § 303.4 (1993) (same). The Government introduced the testimony of two TCB-Sugar Land bank presidents.”
Oberstar v. Federal Deposit Insurance (1993) ca8 · cites it 2× “” 12 C.F.R. § 303.4 (c)(6). The Board reasoned that Oberstar took control of the Bank when he accepted revocable one-year proxies that “placed virtually no limitation on the scope or purpose for which they could be used.”
R. E. Wilbourn v. Stennett Wilkinson & Ward (1993) miss “§1817 ; 12 C.F.R. §303.4 . By filing the change in control notice, Wilbourn made his ownership interest in CNB public knowledge.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.