C.F.R. » Title 12 » CHAPTER III—FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION › SUBCHAPTER B—REGULATIONS AND STATEMENTS OF GENERAL POLICY › PART 329—LIQUIDITY RISK MEASUREMENT STANDARDS › Subpart A—General Provisions

12 C.F.R. § 329.1

Purpose and applicability

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Purpose. This part establishes a minimum liquidity standard and a minimum stable funding standard for certain FDIC-supervised institutions on a consolidated basis, as set forth herein.

(b) Applicability. (1) An FDIC-supervised institution is subject to the minimum liquidity standard, minimum stable funding standard, and other requirements of this part if:

(i) It is a:

(A) GSIB depository institution supervised by the FDIC;

(B) Category II FDIC-supervised institution; or

(C) Category III FDIC-supervised institution; or

(ii) The FDIC has determined that application of this part is appropriate in light of the FDIC-supervised institution's asset size, level of complexity, risk profile, scope of operations, affiliation with foreign or domestic covered entities, or risk to the financial system.

(2) This part does not apply to:

(i) A bridge financial company as defined in 12 U.S.C. 5381(a)(3), or a subsidiary of a bridge financial company;

(ii) A new depository institution or a bridge depository institution, as defined in 12 U.S.C. 1813(i); or

(iii) An insured branch.

(3) In making a determination under paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section, the FDIC will apply, as appropriate, notice and response procedures in the same manner and to the same extent as the notice and response procedures set forth in 12 CFR 324.5.

[84 FR 59279, Nov. 1, 2019, as amended at 86 FR 9218, Feb. 11, 2021]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1978–1996 · leading case: Wisconsin Bankers Ass'n v. Mut. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 275 N.W.2d 130 (Wis. Ct. App. 1978).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Wisconsin Bankers Ass'n v. Mut. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 275 N.W.2d 130 (Wis. Ct. App. 1978). “12 C.F.R. §329.1 (e) (2) and 12 C.F.R. 217.”
In Re Est. of Kozloff, 410 A.2d 544 (Me. 1980). “regulation [ 12 C.F.R. § 329.1 (c)] and the Maine statute [9-B M.”
Triangulum Assoc. v. Harrison Conf. Ctr., No. Cv91-009981s (Jul. 25, 1996), 1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 5149-Y (Conn. Super. Ct. 1996). “" 12 C.F.R. Part 329.1(c). Any award of damages to Harrison on these facts would clearly be CT Page 5149-EE in violation of state and federal law and the public policy underlying these statutes; it could not therefore be said to be required by justice.”
— 12 C.F.R. § 329.1(c) — 1 case
Triangulum Assoc. v. Harrison Conf. Ctr., No. Cv91-009981s (Jul. 25, 1996), 1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 5149-Y (Conn. Super. Ct. 1996). “" 12 C.F.R. Part 329.1(c). Any award of damages to Harrison on these facts would clearly be CT Page 5149-EE in violation of state and federal law and the public policy underlying these statutes; it could not therefore be said to be required by justice.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.