12 C.F.R. § 330.2

Purpose

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The purpose of this part is to clarify the rules and define the terms necessary to afford deposit insurance coverage under the Act and provide rules for the recognition of deposit ownership in various circumstances.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1983–1988 · leading case: Eli B. Jones, of the Est. of Jesse L. Bobo, Deceased v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp., in Its Corp. Capacity, 748 F.2d 1400 (10th Cir. 1984).
Eli B. Jones, of the Est. of Jesse L. Bobo, Deceased v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp., in Its Corp. Capacity, 748 F.2d 1400 (10th Cir. 1984). “6 12 C.F.R. §§ 330.2 (c) and 330.10. 7 12 U.”
Kingman Lambert Cynthia A. Lambert Kristen Lambert Kimberly Lambert v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp., 847 F.2d 604 (9th Cir. 1988). “Joint and Single Ownership Accounts ( 12 C.F.R. §§ 330.2 , 330.9) Lambert contends that each account was separately insurable up to $100,000.”
Anheuser-Busch Employees Credit Union v. Fed. Deposit Ins., 651 F. Supp. 718 (W.D. Mo. 1986). “-2(b) (accounts held by agents or nominees), 12 C.F.R. § 330.2 (c) (accounts held by guardians, custodians or conservators), 12 C.”
Sw. States Gen. Corp. v. McKenzie, 658 S.W.2d 850 (Tex. App. 1983). · cites it 2× “" 12 C.F.R. § 330.2 (1982). Under these provisions the two certificates of deposit are not themselves insured.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.