(a) Notice of filing of petition. Upon the filing of a petition, a notice shall be published in the Federal Register setting forth that a petition has been filed by a domestic interested party, identifying the merchandise which is the subject of the petition, and its present and claimed appraised value or classification or rate of duty. The notice shall invite interested persons to make such written submissions as they desire within such time as is specified in the notice.
(b) Inspection of petition; inspection of documents and papers. The petition filed by a domestic interested party will be made available for inspection by interested parties in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552(a). However, neither a petitioner nor other interested parties will in any case be permitted to inspect documents or papers of the importer of record which are exempted from disclosure by 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4). Identifying data is not to be deleted from petitions filed by American manufacturers, producers, and wholesalers pursuant to section 516, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1516).
(R.S. 251, as amended, secs. 516, 624, 46 Stat. 735, as amended, 759; 5 U.S.C. 552, 19 U.S.C. 66, 1516, 1624)
[T.D. 74-236, 39 FR 33207, Sept. 16, 1974, as amended by T.D. 80-271, 45 FR 75642, Nov. 17, 1980; T.D. 81-168, 46 FR 32574, June 24, 1981; CBP Dec. 15-16, 80 FR 71693, Nov. 17, 2015]
Notes of Decisions
Rubie's Costume Co. v. United States, 337 F.3d 1350 (Fed. Cir. 2003).
· cites it 2× “§ 1516 ; 19 C.F.R. § 175.21 (a) (2003). The com *1353 ment period closed on February 20, 1998, and Customs received numerous comments - in support of, and in opposition to, the reclassification.”
Flintkote Co. v. Blumenthal, 469 F. Supp. 115 (N.D.N.Y. 1979).
“See 19 C.F.R. § 175.21 (1978). Flintkote's § 1516 petition was denied on Friday, January 12, 1979.”
Norcal/Crosetti Foods, Inc. v. United States, 963 F.2d 356 (Fed. Cir. 1992).
“§ 1516(e); 19 C.F.R. § 175.21 (a) (1991). Subsection 1516(b) also provides a specific time limitation when revised determinations must be applied to imported goods.”
Allen Sugar Co., H & R Brokerage Div. v. Brady, 706 F. Supp. 49 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1989).
· cites it 2× “3 Customs neither acted on the petition nor published notice in the Federal Register, as required by 19 C.F.R. § 175.21 (a), 4 that the petition had been filed and that interested persons could submit comments within a specified time period.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.