19 U.S.C. § 66
Rules and forms prescribed by Secretary
The Secretary of the Treasury shall prescribe forms of entries, oaths, bonds, and other papers, and rules and regulations not inconsistent with law, to be used in carrying out the provisions of law relating to raising revenue from imports, or to duties on imports, or to warehousing, and shall give such directions to customs officers and prescribe such rules and forms to be observed by them as may be necessary for the proper execution of the law.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 33
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1929–2026 · leading case: Volkswagen of Am., Inc. v. United States, 532 F.3d 1365 (Fed. Cir. 2008).
Volkswagen of Am., Inc. v. United States, 532 F.3d 1365 (Fed. Cir. 2008). “19 U.S.C. § 66 provides: "The Secretary of the Treasury shall prescribe .”
Yamaha Corp. of Am. v. United States of Am., 961 F.2d 245 (D.C. Cir. 1992). “Remaining Issues Yamaha-America has raised two additional issues: First, that appellees have violated the Fifth Amendment by taking its property rights without just compensation; second, that the Secretary exceeded his authority by promulgating a Regulation that is not…”
United States v. Fed. Ins. Co. & Cometals, Inc., 805 F.2d 1012 (Fed. Cir. 1986). “1 (3) is contrary (per the court) to congressional intent and to three statutory provisions: 19 U.S.C. § 66 (regulations must be consistent with law), 19 U.”
Belgium v. United States, 551 F.3d 1339 (Fed. Cir. 2009). “See 19 U.S.C. §§ 66 , 1677j(b); 19 C.F.R. § 134.”
Gilman J. Chasse v. Robert E. Chasen, 595 F.2d 59 (1st Cir. 1979). “Plaintiffs argued to the district court that either 19 U.S.C. § 66 (1976) (which authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to draft forms of entry, bonds, and regulations pertaining to collection of customs duties and the warehousing of goods) or 19 U.”
Hartford Fire Ins. v. United States, 544 F.3d 1289 (Fed. Cir. 2008). “53 , 61 (1948); see also 19 U.S.C. §§ 66 , 1623 (2006). It has congressional authorization to “prescribe the conditions and form” of bonds.”
Kwo Lee, Inc. v. United States, 24 F. Supp. 3d 1322 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2014). “See 19 U.S.C. §§ 66 , 1623. Further, Customs has promulgated extensive bonding regulations, following notiee-and-comment rulemaking, pursuant to that authority.”
Schaper Mfg. Co. v. Regan, 566 F. Supp. 894 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1983). “The foregoing regulations derive their authority from the delegation granted by the Congress in 19 U.S.C. §§ 66 and 1624. The provisions thereof are, in part, of particular pertinence: § 66.”
Nat'l Fisheries Inst., Inc. v. United States Bureau of Customs & Border Prot., 637 F. Supp. 2d 1270 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2009). “at 5-6 (quoting 19 U.S.C. § 66 (2000)), and argues that § 1623, an early version of which was enacted by Congress as part of the Tariff Act of 1930, Pub.”
Am. Air Parcel Forwarding Co. v. United States, 573 F. Supp. 117 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1983). “43 and statutes 19 U.S.C. § 66 and 1624 and their interrelationship.”
Di Jub Leasing Corp. v. United States, 505 F. Supp. 1113 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1980). “, and these regulations are authorized by 19 U.S.C. §§ 66 , 1551a, 1565 and 1624. The regulations describe the role of the cartman in international trade as the transportation of goods or merchandise, on behalf of the Government or importers, within the limits of a port, for the…”
Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. United States, 2017 CIT 103 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2017). “Hartford concludes with a tetrapartite argument that Customs cannot look to extrinsic evidence to repair deficient contracts, first because the SEBs are statutory bonds, promulgated pursuant to 19 U.S.C. §§ 66 , 1623, and thus are contingent upon compliance with all applicable…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.