20 C.F.R. § 1002.42

What rights does an employee have under USERRA if he or she is on layoff, on strike, or on a leave of absence?

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) If an employee is laid off with recall rights, on strike, or on a leave of absence, he or she is an employee for purposes of USERRA. If the employee is on layoff and begins service in the uniformed services, or is laid off while performing service, he or she may be entitled to reemployment on return if the employer would have recalled the employee to employment during the period of service. Similar principles apply if the employee is on strike or on a leave of absence from work when he or she begins a period of service in the uniformed services.

(b) If the employee is sent a recall notice during a period of service in the uniformed services and cannot resume the position of employment because of the service, he or she still remains an employee for purposes of the Act. Therefore, if the employee is otherwise eligible, he or she is entitled to reemployment following the conclusion of the period of service even if he or she did not respond to the recall notice.

(c) If the employee is laid off before or during service in the uniformed services, and the employer would not have recalled him or her during that period of service, the employee is not entitled to reemployment following the period of service simply because he or she is a covered employee. Reemployment rights under USERRA cannot put the employee in a better position than if he or she had remained in the civilian employment position.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2012–2025 · leading case: Milhauser v. Minco Prods., Inc., 855 F. Supp. 2d 885 (D. Minnesota 2012).
Milhauser v. Minco Prods., Inc., 855 F. Supp. 2d 885 (D. Minnesota 2012). · cites it 2× “” 20 C.F.R. § 1002.42 . In Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.”
Kieshia Mace v. Corey Willis, 897 F.3d 926 (8th Cir. 2018). “And although "USERRA cannot put the employee in a better position than if he or she had remained in the civilian employment position," 20 C.F.R. § 1002.42 (c) (emphasis added), the Act "must be broadly construed in favor of its military beneficiaries.”
Collins v. Staghorn Petroleum II, LLC (N.D. Okla. 2025). · cites it 5× “” 20 C.F.R. § 1002.42 (c) (2025). An employer is not required to reemploy a person if: (i) “the employer’s circumstances have so changed as to make such reemployment impossible or unreasonable”; (ii) reemployment under certain provisions of § 4313 (none of which apply here)…”
Jackson v. City of Birmingham, 364 F. Supp. 3d 1310 (N.D. Ala. 2019). “Pinkney "listed below" is the text of § 4316 of USERRA.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.