(a) With respect to any company or person principally engaged in business other than carrier business, but which, in addition to such principal business, engages in some carrier business, the Board will require submission of information pertaining to the history and all operations of such company or person with a view to determining whether some identifiable and separable enterprise conducted by the person or company is to be considered to be the employer. The determination will be made in the light of considerations such as the following:
(1) The primary purpose of the company or person on and since the date it was established;
(2) The functional dominance or subservience of its carrier business in relation to its non-carrier business;
(3) The amount of its carrier business and the ratio of such business to its entire business;
(4) Whether its carrier business is a separate and distinct enterprise.
(b) In the event that the employer is found to be an aggregate of persons or legal entities or less than the whole of a legal entity or a person operating in only one of several capacities, then the unit or units competent to assume legal obligations shall be responsible for the discharge of the duties of the employer.
Notes of Decisions
City of Galveston v. United States, 33 Fed. Cl. 685 (Fed. Cl. 1995).
· cites it 8× “The RRB standards established in 20 C.F.R. § 202.3 were to apply in a determination of the segregation issue.”
Herzog Transit Servs., Inc. v. United States R.R. Ret. Bd., 624 F.3d 467 (7th Cir. 2010).
· cites it 4× “" 20 C.F.R. § 202.3 . The Board considers the following factors: (1) The primary purpose of the company or person on and since the date it was established; (2) The functional dominance or subservience of its carrier business in relation to its non-carrier business; (3) The…”
City of Galveston ex rel. Bd. of Trs. of the Galveston Wharves v. United States, 22 Cl. Ct. 600 (Ct. Cl. 1991).
· cites it 7× “53 The redesignation of Galveston Wharves’ status as an employer so as to separate its rail carrier operations from its nonrail operations would involve a new application to plaintiff's port activities of the RRB standards established in 20 C.F.R. § 202.3 . Section 202.3 applies…”
Herzog Transit Servs., Incor v. RRRB (7th Cir. 2010).
· cites it 2× “5 20 C.F.R. § 202.3 (a) provides in part: With respect to any company or person principally engaged in business other than carrier business, but (continued.”
Herzog Transit Servs., Incor v. RRRB (7th Cir. 2010).
· cites it 2× “5 20 C.F.R. § 202.3 (a) provides in part: With respect to any company or person principally engaged in business other than carrier business, but (continued.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.