(a) Disabled workers, persons disabled since childhood and, for months after December 1990, disabled widows, widowers, and surviving divorced spouses. If you are entitled to disability cash benefits as a disabled worker, or to child's insurance benefits, or, for monthly benefits payable after December 1990, to widow's, widower's, or surviving divorced spouse's monthly benefits, a disabling impairment is an impairment (or combination of impairments) which, of itself, is so severe that it meets or equals a set of criteria in the Listing of Impairments in appendix 1 of this subpart or which, when considered with your age, education, and work experience, would result in a finding that you are disabled under § 404.1594. In determining whether you have a disabling impairment, earnings are not considered.
(b) Disabled widows, widowers, and surviving divorced spouses, for monthly benefits for months prior to January 1991. If you have been entitled to disability benefits as a disabled widow, widower, or surviving divorced spouse and we must decide whether you had a disabling impairment for any time prior to January 1991, a disabling impairment is an impairment (or combination of impairments) which, of itself, was so severe that it met or equaled a set of criteria in the Listing of Impairments in appendix 1 of this subpart, or results in a finding that you were disabled under § 404.1579. In determining whether you had a disabling impairment, earnings are not considered.
[57 FR 30120, July 8, 1992]
Notes of Decisions
Phillips v. Harris, 488 F. Supp. 1161 (W.D. Va. 1980).
· cites it 2× “See 20 C.F.R. § 404.1511 (c), (e). Given these factors, the Law Judge found that Rule 203.”
Freeman v. Harris, 509 F. Supp. 96 (D.S.C. 1981).
· cites it 3× “*102 The Secretary also concluded, under 20 C.F.R. § 404.1511 (e), that plaintiff’s prior employment experience imparted to him transferable skills.”
Pedro Reyes Robles v. Robert H. Finch, Sec'y of Health, Educ. & Welfare, 409 F.2d 84 (1st Cir. 1969).
“1965), and 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1511 , 404.1526. The facts that appellee allegedly took no medication, slept 11-13 hours a night and failed to seek medical treatment are arguably inconsistent with his complaints of pain and lend credence to the Secretary’s suspicions that he may…”
Ramos v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 514 F. Supp. 57 (D.P.R. 1981).
· cites it 2× “2 The administrative law judge further found plaintiff to be a “skilled worker” with skills transferable to other jobs, according to 20 CFR 404.1511(d) 3 , and to possess a maximum sustained work capacity to perform light work.”
Wander v. Schweiker, 523 F. Supp. 1086 (D. Maryland 1981).
· cites it 2× “Assuming that the plaintiff’s prior work was properly classified by the ALJ as “skilled” employment, compare 20 C.F.R. § 404.1511 (c) (semi-skilled) with id.”
Fains v. Harris, 481 F. Supp. 30 (D. Maryland 1979).
“20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1511 (b)-(e). The Court believes that in the instant case the ALJ obtained sufficient information at the hearing to satisfy the new regulations.”
Lee v. Heckler, 568 F. Supp. 456 (N.D. Ind. 1983).
· cites it 2× “20 CFR § 404.1511 (c) states that: Light work entails lifting 20 pounds maximum with frequent lifting or carrying of *468 objects weighing up to 10 pounds.”
— 20 C.F.R. § 404.1511(b) — 1 case
— 20 C.F.R. § 404.1511(d) — 1 case
Ramos v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 514 F. Supp. 57 (D.P.R. 1981).
“2 The administrative law judge further found plaintiff to be a “skilled worker” with skills transferable to other jobs, according to 20 CFR 404.1511(d) 3 , and to possess a maximum sustained work capacity to perform light work.”
— 20 C.F.R. § 404.1511(e) — 1 case
Ramos v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 514 F. Supp. 57 (D.P.R. 1981).
“2 The administrative law judge further found plaintiff to be a “skilled worker” with skills transferable to other jobs, according to 20 CFR 404.1511(d) 3 , and to possess a maximum sustained work capacity to perform light work.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.