C.F.R. » Title 20 » CHAPTER III—SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION › PART 404—FEDERAL OLD-AGE, SURVIVORS AND DISABILITY INSURANCE (1950- ) › Subpart U—Representative Payment

20 C.F.R. § 404.2025

What information must a representative payee report to us?

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Anytime after we select a representative payee for you, we may ask your payee to give us information showing a continuing relationship with you, a continuing responsibility for your care, and how he/she used the payments on your behalf. If your representative payee does not give us the requested information within a reasonable period of time, we may stop sending your benefit payment to him/her—unless we determine that he/she had a satisfactory reason for not meeting our request and we subsequently receive the requested information. If we decide to stop sending your payment to your representative payee, we will consider paying you directly (in accordance with § 404.2011) while we look for a new payee.

[69 FR 60233, Oct. 7, 2004]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2003–2021 · leading case: Washington State Dep't of Soc. & Health Servs. v. Guardianship Est. of Keffeler, 537 U.S. 371 (2003).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Washington State Dep't of Soc. & Health Servs. v. Guardianship Est. of Keffeler, 537 U.S. 371 (2003). “§§405(j)(2)(B), 1383(a)(2)(B)(ii); see 20 CFR §§404.2025 , 416.625. The Commissioner must also attempt to identify any other potential representative payee whose appointment may be preferred.”
Peace v. Peace, 323 P.3d 1197 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014). “2065 (explaining record keeping requirement of representative payee); 20 C.F.R. § 404.2025 (explaining ability of the SSA to stop sending benefit payments to representative payee for noncompliance).”
Cox v. Lee (D. Ariz. 2020). “2065 (explaining record keeping requirement of representative payee); 20 C.F.R. § 404.2025 (explaining ability of the SSA 2 to stop sending benefit payments to representative payee for non- 3 compliance).”
Vidal v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. (S.D.N.Y. 2021). “2035 (b) and (d); 20 C.F.R. § 404.2025 ; see Steinhardt v. Sullivan, 752 F.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.