20 C.F.R. § 404.701
Introduction
This subpart contains the Social Security Administration's basic rules about what evidence is needed when a person claims old-age, disability, dependents' and survivors' insurance benefits as described in subpart D. In addition, there are special evidence requirements for disability benefits. These are contained in subpart P. Evidence of a person's earnings under social security is described in subpart I. Evidence needed to obtain a social security number card is described in part 422. Evidence requirements for the supplemental security income program are contained in part 416.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1970–2007 · leading case: Minnie Florence Breeden v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Sec'y Health, Educ., & Welfare, 493 F.2d 1002 (4th Cir. 1974).
Minnie Florence Breeden v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Sec'y Health, Educ., & Welfare, 493 F.2d 1002 (4th Cir. 1974). “We disagree with the district court’s characterization of the claimant’s burden of proof. It is true that the claimant has the burden of producing evidence in support of his claim and that his claim for benefits may properly be denied if his evidence is insufficient to persuade…”
Congdon v. Educ. Credit Mgmt. Corp. (In Re Congdon), 365 B.R. 433 (Bankr. D. Vt. 2007). “In this case, the ALJ’s Decision contains factual findings resulting from a factual investigation, where the ALJ weighed evidence concluding that Congdon was disabled against evidence that apparently argued she was not.”
Agatha Shelton v. Sec'y of Health, Educ. & Welfare, United States of Am., 428 F.2d 81 (3rd Cir. 1970). “20 C.F.R. §§ 404.701 (a) and (b), and 404.”
Carlson v. Richardson, 331 F. Supp. 1000 (D. Conn. 1971). “See 20 C.F.R. § 404.701 . Although the hearing examiner did not make an affirmative finding as to the amount of income earned by Mr.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.