20 C.F.R. § 404.904
Notice of the initial determination
We will mail a written notice of our initial determination to you at your last known address. The written notice will explain in simple and clear language what we have determined and the reasons for and the effect of our determination. If our determination involves a determination of disability that is in whole or in part unfavorable to you, our written notice also will contain in understandable language a statement of the case setting forth the evidence on which our determination is based. The notice also will inform you of your right to reconsideration. We will not mail a notice if the beneficiary's entitlement to benefits has ended because of his or her death.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1987–2023 · leading case: Laird v. Ramirez, 884 F. Supp. 1265 (N.D. Iowa 1995).
Laird v. Ramirez, 884 F. Supp. 1265 (N.D. Iowa 1995). “20 C.F.R. § 404.904 -.909 (1991). In Minnesota, the Disability Determination Services of the Minnesota Department of Jobs and Training (DDS) has been designated to handle these first two stages of the administrative adjudication process.”
20 soc.sec.rep.ser. 60, unempl.ins.rep. Cch 17,696 Claire McDonald v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 834 F.2d 1085 (1st Cir. 1987). “Ill); 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.904 , 404.905(a), 404.-929, 404.”
Schoolcraft v. Sullivan, 971 F.2d 81 (8th Cir. 1992). “20 C.F.R. § 404.904 -.909 (1991). In Minnesota, the.”
Gramatic v. Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin. (D. Colo. 2023). “See 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.904 , 404.909(a), 404.920, 404.”
Smith v. Soc. Sec. Admin., Comm'r of (D. Kan. 2022). “20 C.F.R. §§ 404.904 , 404.909. By statute, if the individual does not file a timely appeal, the initial determination is final and not reviewable by the district court.”
Hall, Michael J. v. Astrue, Micahel J., 218 F. App'x 499 (7th Cir. 2007). “The examination’s conclusion that he cannot work regularly primarily relies on the very testimony the ALJ discredited during Hall’s administrative hearing, and the report’s conclusions based on his psychological test results are consistent with the medical evidence the ALJ…”
Robbins v. Colvin, 142 F. Supp. 3d 205 (D. Mass. 2015). “See 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.904 , 404.922, 404.938, 404.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.