20 C.F.R. § 625.11
Provisions of State law applicable
The terms and conditions of the State law of the applicable State for an individual, which apply to claims for, and the payment of regular compensation, shall apply to applications for, and the payment of, DUA to each such individual, only as specifically set forth in the provisions of this part.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2022–2022 · leading case: Matter of Mikheil (Comm'r of Labor), 206 A.D.3d 1422 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 2022).
Matter of Mikheil (Comm'r of Labor), 206 A.D.3d 1422 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 2022). “gov/directives/attach/UIPL/UIPL_16-20.pdf]). Because claimant was not entitled to PUA or FPUC, the Board properly assessed overpayments of benefits paid ( see 15 USC §§ 9021 [h]; 9023 [b] [1]; [f] [2]; 20 CFR 625.”
Martin v. Workforce Servs., 2022 UT App 32, 507 P.3d 847. “See 20 C.F.R. § 625.11 (“The terms and conditions of the State law of the applicable State for an individual, which apply to claims for, and the payment of regular compensation, shall apply to applications for, and the payment of, DUA to each such individual .”
Matter of Lefkow (Comm'r of Labor), 208 A.D.3d 1408 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 2022). “Under these circumstances, we find no basis to disturb the Board's finding that claimant made willful misrepresentations to obtain benefits warranting the imposition of recoverable overpayments of state unemployment insurance benefits and FPUC payments, forfeiture and penalties…”
Cogley v. Ohio Unemp. Rev. Comm., 2022-Ohio-1867. “); 20 C.F.R. 625.11. ODJFS must follow state unemployment compensation law in administering PUA appeals.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.