20 C.F.R. § 639.8
How is the notice served?
Any reasonable method of delivery to the parties listed under § 639.6 of this part which is designed to ensure receipt of notice of least 60 days before separation is acceptable (e.g., first class mail, personal delivery with optional signed receipt). In the case of notification directly to affected employees, insertion of notice into pay envelopes is another viable option. A ticketed notice, i.e., preprinted notice regularly included in each employee's pay check or pay envelope, does not meet the requirements of WARN.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12
cases, 1991–2017 · leading case: Judy Weekes-Walker v. Macon Cnty. Greyhound Park, Inc., 725 F.3d 1276 (11th Cir. 2013).
Judy Weekes-Walker v. Macon Cnty. Greyhound Park, Inc., 725 F.3d 1276 (11th Cir. 2013). “In fact, 20 C.F.R. § 639.8 goes so far as to outline specific methods of notice that are acceptable under the WARN Act, including, but not limited to, “insertion of notice into pay envelopes.”
Int'l Bhd. of Boilermakers v. Nassco Holdings Inc., 226 Cal. Rptr. 3d 206 (Cal. Ct. App. 5th 2017). “" (See 20 C.F.R. § 639.8 ["A ticketed notice, i.”
Guippone v. BH S & B Holdings LLC, 737 F.3d 221 (2d Cir. 2013). “We now adopt the five non-exclusive factors set forth in the Department of Labor (“DOL”) regulations to determine if related entities are single employers, see 20 C.F.R. § 639.8 (a)(3) as the test to be applied in this Circuit in determining whether WARN liability can be imposed…”
Childress v. Darby Lumber, Inc., 126 F. Supp. 2d 1310 (D. Mont. 2001). “Plaintiffs argue that this constitutes a constructive discharge or involuntary termination under 20 C.F.R. § 639.8 (f)(2). Defendants argue that Ingraham’s departure was voluntary, and he was offered a transfer to a different site of employment within a reasonable commuting…”
Cruz v. Robert Abbey, Inc., 778 F. Supp. 605 (E.D.N.Y 1991). “” ( 20 C.F.R. § 639.8 ) In addition, the Senate-House Conference Report which accompanied the WARN legislation stated as follows: “ ‘Employer ’.”
Barnett v. Jamesway Corp. (In Re Jamesway Corp.), 235 B.R. 329 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1999). “The regulations direct that WARN notice be served pursuant to "[a]ny reasonable method of delivery,” see 20 C.F.R. § 639.8 , provided that the selected method is "designed to insure receipt of notice [at] least 60 days before separation .”
Czyzewski v. Jevic Transp., Inc. (In Re Jevic Holding Corp.), 561 B.R. 617 (3rd Cir. 2016). “” 20 C.F.R. § 639.8 (a)(2) (2015). For the reasons given in the well-reasoned opinions of the District Court and Bankruptcy Court, we will affirm.”
Oil, Chem. & Atomic Workers Int'l Union, Local 7-515 v. Am. Home Prods. Corp., 790 F. Supp. 1441 (N.D. Ind. 1992). “Any reasonable method of delivery of the notice is sufficient under 20 C.F.R. § 639.8 . Ms. Malloy received the notice.”
Varela v. Burtch (In re AE Liquidation, Inc.), 556 B.R. 609 (D. Del. 2016). “” 20 C.F.R § 639.8. The February *627 18 and February 24 notices were sent to employees’ workplace emails, and the February 25 termination package was sent to employees’ home addresses.”
Weekes-Walker v. Macon Cnty. Greyhound Park, Inc., 877 F. Supp. 2d 1192 (M.D. Ala. 2012). “20 C.F.R. § 639.8 is entitled “How is the notice served?” and states that “[a]ny reasonable method of delivery to the parties listed under § 639.”
Frymire v. Ampex Corp., 858 F. Supp. 1081 (D. Colo. 1994). “Receipt by mail, personal delivery, and inser *1084 tion of the notice into pay envelopes of affected employees are all contemplated in 20 C.F.R. § 639.8 . That section also states that a ticketed notice, ie.”
The Internat. Bhd. of Boilermakers etc. v. NASSCO etc. (Cal. Ct. App. 2017). “" (See 20 C.F.R. § 639.8 ["A ticketed notice, i.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.