20 C.F.R. § 680.220

Are there particular career services an individual must receive before receiving training services under the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act?

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Yes, except as provided by paragraph (b) of this section, an individual must at a minimum receive either an interview, evaluation, or assessment, and career planning or any other method through which the one-stop center or partner can obtain enough information to make an eligibility determination to be determined eligible for training services under WIOA sec. 134(c)(3)(A)(i) and § 680.210. Where appropriate, a recent interview, evaluation, or assessment, may be used for the assessment purpose.

(b) The case file must contain a determination of need for training services under § 680.210 as determined through the interview, evaluation, or assessment, and career planning informed by local labor market information and training provider performance information, or through any other career service received. There is no requirement that career services be provided as a condition to receipt of training services; however, if career services are not provided before training, the Local WDB must document the circumstances that justified its determination to provide training without first providing the services described in paragraph (a) of this section.

(c) There is no Federally required minimum time period for participation in career services before receiving training services.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2020–2020 · leading case: Jesse Gerber v. State of Wyoming, ex rel., Dep't of Workforce Servs., Unemployment Ins. Comm'n, 2020 WY 90 (Wyo. 2020).
Jesse Gerber v. State of Wyoming, ex rel., Dep't of Workforce Servs., Unemployment Ins. Comm'n, 2020 WY 90 (Wyo. 2020). “§ 3174 (West 2019) (emphasis added); see also 20 C.F.R. § 680.220 (2016) (“an individual must at a minimum receive either an interview, evaluation, or assessment, and career planning or any other method through which the one-stop center or partner can obtain enough information…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.