20 C.F.R. § 725.2

Purpose and applicability of this part

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) This part sets forth the procedures to be followed and standards to be applied in filing, processing, adjudicating, and paying claims filed under part C of subchapter IV of the Act.

(b) This part applies to all claims filed under part C of subchapter IV of the Act on or after June 30, 1982. Publication of certain provisions or parts of certain provisions that apply only to claims filed prior to June 30, 1982, or to claims subject to Section 435 of the Act, has been discontinued because those provisions affect an increasingly smaller number of claims. The version of Part 725 set forth in 20 CFR, parts 500 to end, edition revised as of April 1, 2010, applies to the adjudication of all claims filed prior to June 30, 1982, as appropriate.

(c) The provisions of this part reflect revisions that became effective on January 19, 2001. This part applies to all claims filed after January 19, 2001 and all benefits payments made on such claims. With the exception of the following sections, this part also applies to the adjudication of claims that were pending on January 19, 2001 and all benefits payments made on such claims: §§ 725.101(a)(31), 725.204, 725.212(b), 725.213(c), 725.214(d), 725.219(d), 725.309, 725.310, 725.351, 725.360, 725.367, 725.406, 725.407, 725.408, 725.409, 725.410, 725.411, 725.412, 725.414, 725.415, 725.416, 725.417, 725.418, 725.421(b), 725.423, 725.454, 725.456, 725.457, 725.458, 725.459, 725.465, 725.491, 725.492, 725.493, 725.494, 725.495, 725.547, 725.701(e). The version of those sections set forth in 20 CFR, parts 500 to end, edition revised as of April 1, 1999, apply to the adjudications of claims that were pending on January 19, 2001. For purposes of construing the provisions of this section, a claim will be considered pending on January 19, 2001 if it was not finally denied more than one year prior to that date.

[78 FR 59117, Sept. 25, 2013]
Notes of Decisions
Kentland Elkhorn Coal Corporation v. Noah Hall Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Departm (2002) ca6 · cites it 3× “See 20 C.F.R. § 725.2 (2001). According to 20 C.”
Crowe Ex Rel. Crowe v. Zeigler Coal Co. (2011) ca7 · cites it 2× “20, 2000); 20 C.F.R. § 725.2 (c) (2010); Zeigler Coal Co.”
The Daniels Company, Incorporated v. Freda Mitchell, Surviving Spouse of James Mitchell Director, Office of Workers' Com (2007) ca4 · cites it 2× “See 20 C.F.R. § 725.2 (c) (2006). As a result, the revisions to the black lung regulations govern the issue of whether Mitchell is entitled to black lung benefits under the Act but not the issue of whether Daniels was properly designated the responsible operator liable for the…”
Sharpe v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs (2007) ca4 “See 20 C.F.R. § 725.2 (c) (limiting application of those sections (among others) as amended to claims initiated on or after January 19, 2001).”
Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Smoot (2010) wva “See 20 C.F.R. § 725.2 (2003). 6 . Under the regulations that apply to Mr.”
Rockwood Cas. Ins. Co. v. Dir., Office of Workers' Comp. Programs (2019) ca10 “20 C.F.R. § 725.2 ("This part applies to all claims filed after January 19, 2001 and all benefits payments made on such claims.”
National Mining Ass'n v. Department of Labor (2002) cadc “See also 20 C.F.R. § 725.2 (setting forth the applicability of the provisions).”
Glen Coal Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs (2003) ca6 · cites it 2× “20 C.F.R. § 725.2 . Glen Coal had again argued in its motion for reconsideration that the ALJ had failed to follow the dictates of Seals I.”
Imogene Shepherd v. Incoal, Inc. (2019) ca6 “See 20 C.F.R. § 725.2 (c). Discounting the months that the miner himself indicated he had not worked in the coal mines, the BRB determined that Tramble Shepherd could be credited with only 14.”
National Mining Ass'n v. Chao (2001) dcd “20 C.F.R. § 725.2 (c): This rule provides that 20 C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.