20 C.F.R. § 725.490

Statutory provisions and scope

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) One of the major purposes of the black lung benefits amendments of 1977 was to provide a more effective means of transferring the responsibility for the payment of benefits from the Federal government to the coal industry with respect to claims filed under this part. In furtherance of this goal, a Black Lung Disability Trust Fund financed by the coal industry was established by the Black Lung Benefits Revenue Act of 1977. The primary purpose of the Fund is to pay benefits with respect to all claims in which the last coal mine employment of the miner on whose account the claim was filed occurred before January 1, 1970. With respect to most claims in which the miner's last coal mine employment occurred after January 1, 1970, individual coal mine operators will be liable for the payment of benefits. The 1981 amendments to the Act relieved individual coal mine operators from the liability for payment of certain special claims involving coal mine employment on or after January 1, 1970, where the claim was previously denied and subsequently approved under section 435 of the Act. See § 725.496 for a detailed description of these special claims. Where no such operator exists or the operator determined to be liable is in default in any case, the fund shall pay the benefits due and seek reimbursement as is appropriate. See also § 725.420 for the fund's role in the payment of interim benefits in certain contested cases. In addition, the Black Lung Benefits Reform Act of 1977 amended certain provisions affecting the scope of coverage under the Act and describing the effects of particular corporate transactions on the liability of operators.

(b) The provisions of this subpart define the term “operator” and prescribe the manner in which the identity of an operator which may be liable for the payment of benefits—referred to herein as a “responsible operator”—will be determined.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases, 1987–2016 · leading case: Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs v. Oglebay Norton Co., 877 F.2d 1300 (6th Cir. 1989).
Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs v. Oglebay Norton Co., 877 F.2d 1300 (6th Cir. 1989). · cites it 2× “’’ 20 C.F.R. § 725.490 (b). . Oglebay contends that this language pertains only to the processing of a claim under subpart D, which, it argues, applies only to the administration of a claim by the deputy commissioner.”
The Daniels Co., Inc. v. Freda Mitchell, Surviving Spouse of James Mitchell Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, 479 F.3d 321 (4th Cir. 2007). “2006); 20 C.F.R. § 725.490 (2000). The “responsible operator” is “the operator which is determined liable for the payment of benefits” under the regulations.”
Earl Davis v. Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, U.S. Dep't of Labor, & Kaiser Steel Co., 936 F.2d 1111 (10th Cir. 1991). “Kaiser Steel does not dispute that it is the responsible coal mine operator under 20 C.F.R. § 725.490 -.493 (1990). A responsible coal mine operator is directly liable for the payment of black lung benefits on a claim filed by a miner who worked for it after December 31, 1969.”
Consolidation Coal Co. v. McMahon, 77 F.3d 898 (6th Cir. 1996). “On August 22, 1979, the Department of Labor notified Employer Consolidation Coal Company that it had been identified as the responsible operator pursuant to 20 C.F.R. §§ 725.490 -.495 and was potentially liable for the payment of any benefits awarded to claimant.”
Armando Venicassa v. Consolidation Coal Co. & Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, United States Dep't of Labor, 137 F.3d 197 (3rd Cir. 1998). “The Trust Fund was established by the Black Lung Benefits Revenue Act of 1977 “to provide a more effective means of transferring the responsibility for the payment of benefits from the Federal government to the coal industry____” 20 C.F.R. § 725.490 (a). The Black Lung Benefits…”
Consolidation Coal Co. v. Everett Galusky, 648 F. App'x 316 (4th Cir. 2016). “See generally 20 C.F.R. §§ 725.490 , 725.495. 3 . Before the Board, CONSOL's argument was that the ALJ improperly applied the strict rule-out standard to the second, rebuttal prong, and that it should have been permitted to rebut disability causation under a more lenient…”
Metzler v. Tackett & Manning Coal Corp., 958 F. Supp. 307 (E.D. Ky. 1997). “See 20 C.F.R. 725.490(a) (“One of the major purposes of the black lung benefits amendments of 1977 was to provide a more effective means of transferring the responsibility of the payment of benefits from the Federal government to the coal industry with respect to claims filed…”
Connors v. Amax Coal Co., 674 F. Supp. 22 (S.D. Ind. 1987). “§ 9501 ; 20 C.F.R. § 725.490 . The Fund, which is financed by the coal industry, is primarily responsible for benefit payments to miners whose last coal mine employment occurred before January 1, 1970.”
C & K Coal Co. v. Taylor, 165 F.3d 254 (3rd Cir. 1999). “§ 932 (h); 20 C.F.R. §§ 725.490 — 725.493. The regulation at issue, 20 C.”
Clinchfield Coal Co. v. Fultz, 61 F. App'x 866 (4th Cir. 2003). · cites it 2× “See 20 C.F.R. §§ 725.490 , 725.492 (2002). Clinchfield Coal has also agreed that Mr.”
Sterling Smokeless Coal Corp. v. Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, 72 F. App'x 942 (4th Cir. 2003). “See 20 C.F.R. § 725.490 (a) (2001); id. § 725.”
Daniels Co., Inc v. Mitchell (4th Cir. 2007). “2006); 20 C.F.R. § 725.490 (2000). The "responsible operator" is "the operator which is determined lia- ble for the payment of benefits" under the regulations.”
— 20 C.F.R. § 725.490(a) — 1 case
Metzler v. Tackett & Manning Coal Corp., 958 F. Supp. 307 (E.D. Ky. 1997). “See 20 C.F.R. 725.490(a) (“One of the major purposes of the black lung benefits amendments of 1977 was to provide a more effective means of transferring the responsibility of the payment of benefits from the Federal government to the coal industry with respect to claims filed…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.