C.F.R. » Title 28 » CHAPTER V—BUREAU OF PRISONS, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE › SUBCHAPTER A—GENERAL MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION › PART 513—ACCESS TO RECORDS › Subpart D—Release of Information

28 C.F.R. § 513.34

Protection of individual privacy—disclosure of records to third parties

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Information that concerns an individual and is contained in a system of records maintained by the Bureau shall not be disclosed to any person, or to another agency except under the provisions of the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a, the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552, and Departmental regulations.

(b) Lists of Bureau inmates shall not be disclosed.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2002–2024 · leading case: Brady-Lunny v. Massey, 185 F. Supp. 2d 928 (C.D. Ill. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Brady-Lunny v. Massey, 185 F. Supp. 2d 928 (C.D. Ill. 2002). · cites it 7× “” See 28 CFR § 513.34 (b). The Plaintiffs contend that the Government’s refusal was improper since: 1) they made their request pursuant to the Illinois FOIA, not the Federal FOIA; 2) 28 CFR § 513 .”
Better Gov't Ass'n v. Blagojevich, 899 N.E.2d 382 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008). “The sheriff provided the information sought for state inmates but not for federal inmates because the Code of Federal Regulations prohibited disclosure of “lists” of federal inmates ( 28 C.F.R. §513.34 (b) (2006)). The newspaper company later sued the sheriff to compel…”
Stephen Yagman v. United States Bureau of Prisons, 605 F. App'x 666 (9th Cir. 2015). “Because these exemptions were properly invoked, we need not address Yagman’s arguments regarding 28 C.F.R. § 513.34 (b). 2. The district court did .”
Jones v. Russell (D. Nev. 2024). · cites it 2× “As a preliminary matter, it is not clear if 28 C.F.R. § 513.34 would apply to 17 preclude Defendant from responding to these interrogatories.”
Better Gov't Ass'n v. Blagojevich (Ill. App. Ct. 2008). “The sheriff provided the information sought for state inmates but not for federal inmates because the Code of Federal Regulations prohibited disclosure of "lists" of federal inmates ( 28 C.F.R. §513.34 (b) (2006)). The newspaper company later sued the sheriff to compel…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.