(a) This part establishes general rules that apply to an institution that participates in any student financial assistance program authorized by Title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (Title IV, HEA program). To the extent that an institution contracts with a third-party servicer to administer any aspect of the institution's participation in any Title IV, HEA program, the applicable rules in this part also apply to that servicer. An institution's use of a third-party servicer does not alter the institution's responsibility for compliance with the rules in this part.
(b) As used in this part, an “institution,” unless otherwise specified, includes—
(1) An institution of higher education as defined in 34 CFR 600.4;
(2) A proprietary institution of higher education as defined in 34 CFR 600.5; and
(3) A postsecondary vocational institution as defined in 34 CFR 600.6.
(c) The Title IV, HEA programs include—
(1) The Federal Pell Grant Program (20 U.S.C. 1070a et seq.; 34 CFR part 690);
(2) The Academic Competitiveness Grant (ACG) Program (20 U.S.C. 1070a-1; 34 CFR part 691);
(3) The Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grant (FSEOG) Program (20 U.S.C. 1070b et seq.; 34 CFR parts 673 and 676);
(4) The Leveraging Educational Assistance Partnership (LEAP) Program (20 U.S.C. 1070c et seq.; 34 CFR part 692);
(5) The Federal Stafford Loan Program (20 U.S.C. 1071 et seq.; 34 CFR part 682);
(6) The Federal PLUS Program (20 U.S.C. 1078-2; 34 CFR part 682);
(7) The Federal Consolidation Loan Program (20 U.S.C. 1078-3; 34 CFR part 682);
(8) The Federal Work-Study (FWS) Program (42 U.S.C. 2751 et seq.; 34 CFR parts 673 and 675);
(9) The William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan (Direct Loan) Program (20 U.S.C. 1087a et seq.; 34 CFR part 685);
(10) The Federal Perkins Loan Program (20 U.S.C. 1087aa et seq.; 34 CFR parts 673 and 674);
(11) The National Science and Mathematics Access to Retain Talent Grant (National SMART Grant) Program (20 U.S.C. 1070a-1; 34 CFR part 691); and
(12) The Teacher Education Assistance for College and Higher Education (TEACH) Grant program.
[52 FR 45724, Dec. 1, 1987, as amended at 56 FR 36696, July 31, 1991; 59 FR 22418, Apr. 29, 1994; 61 FR 60396, Nov. 27, 1996; 63 FR 40623, July 29, 1998; 65 FR 38729, June 22, 2000; 71 FR 38002, July 3, 2006; 73 FR 35492, June 23, 2008; 85 FR 54813, Sept. 2, 2020]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
6
cases (
1 in the last 5 years), 1992–2025 · leading case:
Z.J. v. Vanderbilt Univ., 355 F. Supp. 3d 646 (M.D. Tenn. 2018).
Z.J. v. Vanderbilt Univ., 355 F. Supp. 3d 646 (M.D. Tenn. 2018).
“…of the Clery Act may result in it not receiving federal funding for its student financial assistance programs. See 34 C.F.R. § 668.1 .”
Doe v. Univ. of the South, 687 F. Supp. 2d 744 (E.D. Tenn. 2009).
“34 C.F.R. § 668.1 . Accordingly, the Court will not exercise declaratory jurisdiction and Plaintiffs’ Clery Act claims will be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”
Delta Sch. of Com., Inc. v. Harris, 839 S.W.2d 203 (Ark. 1992).
· cites it 2× “34 C.F.R. § 668.1 (1991). Subpart F of the regulations establishes standards and rules by which the Secretary may initiate a proceeding against an otherwise eligible institution for any substantial misrepresentation made by that institution regarding the nature of its…”
Dumas v. Kipp, 90 F.3d 386 (9th Cir. 1996).
“§§ 1078-1 (a), 1082(h)(3); 34 C.F.R. § 668.1 et seq., and the Secretary may review and correct the state guaranty agencies’ incorrect eligibility determinations, as long as the eligible institution does not waive this statutory review.”
Matter of Balyberdina v. Nat'l Inst. for the Psychotherapies, 138 A.D.3d 616 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016).
“To the extent petitioner argues that respondent violated title IV of the Higher Education Act (HEA) of 1965, respondent’s evidence shows that title IV and its implementing regulations do not apply to respondent because it does not participate in any title IV, HEA programs or any…”
Wescott v. E. Univ. (E.D. Pa. 2025).
“” See 34 C.F.R. § 668.1 (noting the “scope” of Part 668 of the HEA regulations).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.