42 U.S.C. § 2751

Transferred

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

[transferred]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 25 cases, 1973–2016 · leading case: Grove City Coll. v. Bell, 465 U.S. 555 (1984).
Grove City Coll. v. Bell, 465 U.S. 555 (1984). · cites it 2× “674 (1983) (National Direct Student Loans); 42 U. S. C. § 2751 et seq. (1976 ed. and Supp.”
Murphy v. Villanova Univ., 547 F. Supp. 512 (E.D. Pa. 1982). · cites it 4× “A protracted period of discovery ensued, and defendants moved for summary judgment, contending (1) that plaintiff’s § 1983 claim must fail because the undisputed facts reveal that defendants’ conduct was not tantamount to state action, and (2) that, as a matter of law, the…”
Student Gov't Ass'n of Wilberforce Univ. v. Wilberforce Univ., 578 F. Supp. 935 (S.D. Ohio 1983). · cites it 5× “” 42 U.S.C. § 2751 (a). Participation by a school in the College Work Study Program is voluntary.”
Haffer v. Temple Univ. of Com. Sys., Etc., 524 F. Supp. 531 (E.D. Pa. 1981). · cites it 2× “According to the affidavits and depositions filed by plaintiffs, 13 the federal government paid eighty percent of the wages of over fifty part-time and some full-time employees of the intercollegiate athletic program through the federally funded College Work-Study Program, 42…”
United States Ex Rel. Diop v. Wayne Cnty. Cmty. Coll. Dist., 242 F. Supp. 2d 497 (E.D. Mich. 2003). “] and part C of subchapter I of chapter 34 of Title 42 [ 42 U.S.C.A. § 2751 et seq.] based on the most recent student loan default rate data provided by the Secretary, the results of financial or compliance audits, program reviews, and any such other information as the Secretary…”
Hayes v. City Univ. of New York, 503 F. Supp. 946 (S.D.N.Y. 1981). “Part 174 (1979), and the College Work Study program (“CWS”), 42 U.S.C. § 2751 ; 45 C.F.R. Part 175, Subpart A (1979).”
United States v. Johnnie Ruth Smith, Loretta Stephens, & Mary Hooper, 596 F.2d 662 (5th Cir. 1979). “Eighty percent of the funds is provided by the federal government, but the local institution must supply the remaining twenty percent.”
Mission Grp. Kansas, Inc. v. Riley, 146 F.3d 775 (10th Cir. 1998). “” Unlike the specific directive to develop “standards” in § 1094(c), the Secretary is charged with “determining] whether an institution has the financial responsibility” to participate in Title IV financial aid programs, see 20 U.”
Ass'n of Private Sector Colleges & Universities v. Duncan, 640 F. App'x 5 (D.C. Cir. 2016). “A program’s performance under the debt metrics determines whether its students are eligible for federal student loans under Title IV of the Higher Education Act, Pub.”
St. Mary of the Plains v. Higher Ed. Loan Prog., 724 F. Supp. 803 (D. Kan. 1989). “In a related student financial assistance program, the federal College Work-Study program, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2751 et seq., two other courts found no implied private cause of action on behalf of the students.”
Murphy v. Villanova Univ., 520 F. Supp. 560 (E.D. Pa. 1981). · cites it 2× “Murphy has also filed a motion for summary judgment and a supporting memorandum asserting two causes of action: “an implied cause of action under the Work-Study statute [ 42 U.S.C. § 2751 et seq.]; and various Civil Rights statutes.”
Hudson v. Academy of Court Reporting, Inc., 746 F. Supp. 718 (S.D. Ohio 1990). “The Court also noted that in a related student financial assistance program, the federal College Workstudy program, 42 U.S.C. § 2751 et seq., two other courts found no implied private cause of action on behalf of the student.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.