6 C.F.R. § 5.3

Requirements for making requests

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) General information. (1) DHS has a decentralized system for responding to FOIA requests, with each component designating a FOIA office to process records from that component. All components have the capability to receive requests electronically, either through email or a web portal. To make a request for DHS records, a requester should write directly to the FOIA office of the component that maintains the records being sought. A request will receive the quickest possible response if it is addressed to the FOIA office of the component that maintains the records sought. DHS's FOIA Reference Guide contains or refers the reader to descriptions of the functions of each component and provides other information that is helpful in determining where to make a request. Each component's FOIA office and any additional requirements for submitting a request to a given component are listed in appendix A to this part. These references can all be used by requesters to determine where to send their requests within DHS.

(2) A requester may send their request to the Privacy Office, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, via the internet at https://www.dhs.gov/foia or for any of the Headquarters Offices of the Department of Homeland Security listed in Appendix A to Subpart 5, or https://www.foia.gov/. Upon request, DHS FOIA public liaisons may facilitate, in limited circumstances (e.g., incarceration), an alternative method to submit requests for requesters who are unable to submit electronic requests. Please direct such requests to the liaison of the Office or DHS Component you wish to seek records from, which can be found listed in Appendix A to Subpart 5 or found here: https://www.dhs.gov/foia-contact-information. In addition, if a requester does not know which DHS component may maintain responsive records to a request, the requester may explicitly ask for assistance from the DHS Privacy Office with identifying the proper component that most likely maintains any potential responsive records. Upon a request for assistance and based on information provided in the FOIA request and by the requester, the Privacy Office will forward the request to the DHS component(s) that it determines to be most likely, as of the date of the request for information, to maintain the records that are sought. The Privacy Office will notify the requester that it is forwarding the request, including identifying the component(s) where the request has been sent, provide the FOIA Public Liaison contact information for the respective component(s), and provide administrative appeal rights in the response. If the requester does not agree with the Privacy Office's determination regarding which components would likely have records responsive to the request, the requester must submit a timely appeal of the Privacy Office's determination. Although these are not to be considered misdirected requests, the recipient DHS component shall be granted the same number of days to respond as permitted by 6 CFR 5.4(c) and 5.5(a).

(3) A requester who is making a request for records about him or herself must comply with the verification of identity provision set forth in subpart B of this part.

(4) Where a request for records pertains to a third party, a requester may receive greater access by submitting either a notarized authorization signed by that individual, in compliance with the verification of identity provision set forth in subpart B of this part, or a declaration made in compliance with the requirements set forth in 28 U.S.C. 1746 by that individual, authorizing disclosure of the records to the requester, or by submitting proof that the individual is deceased (e.g., a copy of a death certificate or an obituary). As an exercise of its administrative discretion, each component can require a requester to supply additional information if necessary in order to verify that a particular individual has consented to disclosure.

(b) Description of records sought. Requesters must describe the records sought in sufficient detail to enable DHS personnel to locate them with a reasonable amount of effort. A reasonable description contains sufficient information to permit an organized, non-random search for the record based on the component's filing arrangements and existing retrieval systems. To the extent possible, requesters should include specific information that may assist a component in identifying the requested records, such as the date, title or name, author, recipient, subject matter of the record, case number, file designation, or reference number. Requesters should refer to appendix A to this part for additional component-specific requirements. In general, requesters should include as much detail as possible about the specific records or the types of records that they are seeking. Before submitting their requests, requesters may contact the component's FOIA Officer or FOIA public liaison to discuss the records they are seeking and to receive assistance in describing the records. If after receiving a request, a component determines that it does not reasonably describe the records sought, the component should inform the requester what additional information is needed or why the request is otherwise insufficient. Requesters who are attempting to reformulate or modify such a request may discuss their request with the component's designated FOIA Officer, its FOIA Public Liaison, or a representative of the DHS Privacy Office, each of whom is available to assist the requester in reasonably describing the records sought.

(c) If a request does not adequately describe the records sought, DHS may at its discretion either seek additional information from the requester, or administratively close the request. Requests for clarification or more information will be made in writing electronically whenever possible (either via electronic mail or portal message) except when DHS requests to speak on the phone to discuss the request. If DHS communicates via a phone call, DHS will summarize the call in a follow up electronic mail or portal message. If DHS corresponds only electronically via electronic mail or portal message, requesters must respond to requests for additional information also by electronic mail or portal message in the same medium as the DHS correspondence. In order to be considered timely, responses to requests for additional information must be received by electronic mail or portal message within 30 working days of the electronic mail or portal message request for additional information. If the requester does not respond to a request for additional information within 30 working days, the request may be administratively closed at DHS's discretion. This administrative closure does not prejudice the requester's ability to submit a new request for further consideration with additional information. Upon request, DHS FOIA public liaisons may facilitate, in limited circumstances (e.g., incarceration), an alternative method to submit requests for requesters who are unable to submit electronic requests. Please direct such requests to the liaison of the Office or DHS Component you wish to seek records from, which can be found listed in Appendix A to Subpart 5 or found here: https://www.dhs.gov/foia-contact-information.

[81 FR 83632, Nov. 22, 2016, as amended at 87 FR 68601, Nov. 16, 2022; 89 FR 14370, Feb. 27, 2024; 90 FR 59946, Dec. 23, 2025]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 26 cases (10 in the last 5 years), 2010–2025 · leading case: New Orleans Workers' Ctr. for Racial Just. v. U.S. Immigr. & Customs Enf't, 373 F. Supp. 3d 16 (D.C. Cir. 2019).
New Orleans Workers' Ctr. for Racial Just. v. U.S. Immigr. & Customs Enf't, 373 F. Supp. 3d 16 (D.C. Cir. 2019). · cites it 6× “6 C.F.R. § 5.3 (b) (2015). 5 Here, it is undisputed that the defendant did not notify the plaintiffs at any point prior to the filing of this action that it believed the Request failed to reasonably describe the records sought or give the plaintiffs an opportunity to address…”
Rubman v. United States Citizenship & Immigr. Servs., 800 F.3d 381 (7th Cir. 2015). · cites it 2× “6 C.F.R. § 5.3 (b). CIS did not consult Rubman because it found his request to be, unambiguously, a request for summary statistics.”
SAI v. Transp. Sec. Admin., 315 F. Supp. 3d 218 (D.C. Cir. 2018). “6 C.F.R. § 5.3 (a) (2003) (superseded 2016); see also 6 C.”
Skurow v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 892 F. Supp. 2d 319 (D.D.C. 2012). “15, at 3 (citing 6 C.F.R. § 5.3 (a) (“You may make a request for records of the Department by writing directly to the Department component that maintains those records.”
Dugan v. Dep't of Just., 82 F. Supp. 3d 485 (D.D.C. 2015). “See 6 C.F.R. § 5.3 (b) (DHS regulation informing requesters that a “request [that] does not reasonably describe the records you seek” may delay the agency’s response).”
Techserve All. v. Napolitano, 803 F. Supp. 2d 16 (D.D.C. 2011). “§ 5 , the letter only directed NACCB’s attention to 6 C.F.R. § 5.3 , which describes the payment process for FOIA requests.”
Am. Civil Liberties Union v. United States Dep't of Homeland Sec., 738 F. Supp. 2d 93 (D.D.C. 2010). “See 6 C.F.R. § 5.3 (b); Kowalczyk v. Dep't of Justice, 73 F.”
Bernt Walther Von Grabe v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 440 F. App'x 687 (11th Cir. 2011). “6 C.F.R. § 5.3 (a). If a person receives all the information he has requested under FOIA, even if the information was delivered late, his FOIA claim is moot to the extent that such information was sought.”
Gonzales & Gonzales Bonds & Ins. Agency Inc. v. United States Dep't of Homeland Sec., 913 F. Supp. 2d 865 (N.D. Cal. 2012). · cites it 2× “) Plaintiff attributes many of these allegedly improper withholdings to DHS’s reliance on the consent provision in 6 C.F.R. § 5.3 (a) (“the Consent Provision”), through which DHS mandates that if a party makes a FOIA request about another individual, “either a written…”
New Orleans Workers' Ctr. for Racial Just. v. United States Immigr. & Customs Enf't (D.D.C. 2019). · cites it 6× “10 6 C.F.R. § 5.3 (b) (2015). 5 Here, it is undisputed that the defendant did not notify the plaintiffs at any point prior to the filing of this action that it believed the Request failed to reasonably describe the records sought or give the plaintiffs an opportunity to address…”
Am. Civil Liberties Union v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec. (D.D.C. 2023). · cites it 6× “It argues that, if the ACLU wanted DHS to search files maintained by OIG, it should have submitted a FOIA request to OIG; that the Privacy Office was required only to forward the ACLU’s request to the DHS “component(s) that [the Privacy Office] determine[d] to be most likely to…”
Howell v. Dep't of Homeland Sec. (D.D.C. 2024). · cites it 6× “” 6 C.F.R. § 5.3 (b). The rules further dictate that requesters should, “[t]o the extent possible,” “include specific information that may assist a component in identifying the requested records, such as the date, title or name, author, recipient, subject matter of the record,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.