6 C.F.R. § 5.41

Purpose and scope; definitions

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) This subpart C sets forth the procedures to be followed with respect to:

(1) Service of summonses and complaints or other requests or demands directed to the Department of Homeland Security (Department) or to any Department employee or former employee in connection with federal or state litigation arising out of or involving the performance of official activities of the Department; and

(2) The oral or written disclosure, in response to subpoenas, orders, or other requests or demands of federal or state judicial or quasi-judicial or administrative authority as well as state legislative authorities (collectively, “demands”), whether civil or criminal in nature, or in response to requests for depositions, affidavits, admissions, responses to interrogatories, document production, interviews, or other litigation-related matters, including pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, or applicable state rules (collectively, “requests”), of any material contained in the files of the Department, any information relating to material contained in the files of the Department, or any information acquired while the subject of the demand or request is or was employed by the Department, or served as Secretary of the Department, as part of the performance of that person's duties or by virtue of that person's official status.

(b) The provisions established by this subpart shall apply to all Department components that are transferred to the Department. Except to the extent a Department component has adopted separate guidance governing the subject matter of a provision of this subpart, the provisions of this subpart shall apply to each component of the Department. Departmental components may issue their own guidance under this subpart subject to the approval of the General Counsel of the Department.

(c) For purposes of this subpart, and except as the Department may otherwise determine in a particular case, the term employee includes all former Secretaries of Homeland Security and all employees of the Department of Homeland Security or other federal agencies who are or were appointed by, or subject to the supervision, jurisdiction, or control of the Secretary of Homeland Security, whether residing or working in the United States or abroad, including United States nationals, foreign nationals, and contractors. The procedures established within this subpart also apply to former employees of the Department where specifically noted.

(d) For purposes of this subpart, the term litigation encompasses all pre-trial, trial, and post-trial stages of all judicial or administrative actions, hearings, investigations, or similar proceedings before courts, commissions, boards (including the Board of Appellate Review), grand juries, or other judicial or quasi-judicial bodies or tribunals, whether criminal, civil, or administrative in nature. This subpart governs, inter alia, responses to discovery requests, depositions, and other pre-trial, trial, or post-trial proceedings, as well as responses to informal requests by attorneys or others in situations involving litigation. However, this subpart shall not apply to any claims against the Department by Department of Homeland Security employees (present or former), or applicants for Department employment, for which jurisdiction resides with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission; the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board; the Office of Special Counsel; the Federal Labor Relations Authority; the Foreign Service Labor Relations Board; the Foreign Service Grievance Board; or a labor arbitrator operating under a collective bargaining agreement between the Department and a labor organization representing Department employees; or their successor agencies or entities.

(e) For purposes of this subpart, official information means all information of any kind, however stored, that is in the custody and control of the Department, relates to information in the custody and control of the Department, or was acquired by Department employees, or former employees, as part of their official duties or because of their official status within the Department while such individuals were employed by or served on behalf of the Department.

(f) Nothing in this subpart affects disclosure of information under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552, the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a, Executive Order 12958 on national security information (3 CFR, 1995 Comp., p. 333), the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b, the Department's implementing regulations or pursuant to congressional subpoena. Nothing in this subpart permits disclosure of information by the Department, its present and former employees, or the Secretary, that is protected or prohibited by statute or other applicable law.

(g) This subpart is intended only to inform the public about Department procedures concerning the service of process and responses to demands or requests and is not intended to and does not create, and may not be relied upon to create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law by a party against the Department or the United States.

(h) Nothing in this subpart affects the rules and procedures, under applicable U.S. law and international conventions, governing diplomatic and consular immunity.

(i) Nothing in this subpart affects the disclosure of official information to other federal agencies or Department of Justice attorneys in connection with litigation conducted on behalf or in defense of the United States, its agencies, officers, and employees, or litigation in which the United States has an interest; or to federal, state, local, or foreign prosecuting and law enforcement authorities in conjunction with criminal law enforcement investigations, prosecutions, or other proceedings, e.g., extradition, deportation.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2007–2025 · leading case: United States v. Soriano-Jarquin, 492 F.3d 495 (4th Cir. 2007).
United States v. Soriano-Jarquin, 492 F.3d 495 (4th Cir. 2007). · cites it 3× “See 6 C.F.R. §§ 5.41 -.49 (2006). On September 7, 2005, however, the defense attempted to serve the government with a subpoena for Fulton that was not in compliance with the regulations.”
Starr Indem. & Liab. Co. v. Water Quality Ins. Syndicate, 320 F. Supp. 3d 549 (S.D. Ill. 2018). “In brief, Starr sought testimony from a Coast Guard witness as, effectively, a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(6) corporate witness.”
Debry v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 688 F. Supp. 2d 1103 (S.D. Cal. 2009). · cites it 2× “, because of the DHS’s allegedly “unwarranted refusal to permit discovery that has been requested in accordance with the agency’s so-called ‘Touhy regulations’ set forth in 6 C.F.R. § 5.41 et seq.” (Doc. #1 ¶3). This is the proper procedure for Plaintiffs to seek judicial review…”
United States v. Neville Lyimo, 574 F. App'x 667 (6th Cir. 2014). · cites it 2× “The Government filed a motion to quash the subpoena compelling DeWeese’s testimony because Lyimo did not comply with federal regulations for subpoenaing third-party federal government employees, found in 6 C.F.R. §§ 5.41 -.49. The district court granted the motion and DeWeese…”
Pollock v. Barbosa Grp., Inc., 478 F. Supp. 2d 410 (W.D.N.Y. 2007). “” See 6 C.F.R § 5.41 et seq. (Department of Homeland Security); 41 C.”
State of New Jersey Vs. Thomas Everett(15-09-1184, Bergen Cnty. & Statewide) (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2017). · cites it 2× “The State filed a notice of appeal on December 13, 2016 and the motion judge issued a written amplification of his decision under Rule 2:5-1(b).”
United States v. Soriano-Jarquin (4th Cir. 2007). · cites it 3× “See 6 C.F.R. §§ 5.41 -.49 (2006). On September 7, 2005, how- ever, the defense attempted to serve the government with a subpoena for Fulton that was not in compliance with the regulations.”
United States v. Carlos Cuevas-Almonte (3rd Cir. 2025). “The District Court denied Cuevas-Almonte’s motion for failure to comply with the Department of Homeland Security’s applicable Touhy Regulations, 6 C.F.R. §§ 5.41 , et seq. In response, Cuevas-Almonte moved to declare DHS’s Touhy Regulations inapplicable, or in the alternative,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.