Colo. Rev. Stat. » Title 14
Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 14-5-103 (2026)

State tribunals and support enforcement agency

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The court and the administrative agency are the tribunals of this state.

(b) The county and state child support services agencies are the support enforcement agencies of this state.

Source: L. 2003: Entire part amended with relocations, p. 1243, § 2, effective July 1, 2004. L. 2015: Entire section amended, (HB 15-1198), ch. 173, p. 546, § 2, effective July 1.

Editor's note: In 2003, this section was formerly numbered as § 14-5-102, and the former § 14-5-103 was relocated to § 14-5-104.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases, 1979–2003 · leading case: People Ex Rel. R.L.H., 942 P.2d 1386 (Colo. Ct. App. 1997).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People Ex Rel. R.L.H., 942 P.2d 1386 (Colo. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 3× “Section 14-5-103, C.R.S. (1996 Cum.Supp.).”
In Re the Marriage of Zinke, 967 P.2d 210 (Colo. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “In advancing this argument he points to § 14-5-103, C.R.S.1998, of the UIFSA which states that the remedies under that Act are “cumulative and do not affect the availability of remedies under other law.”
Gruber v. Wallner, 598 P.2d 135 (Colo. 1979). · cites it 6× “” See, section 14-5-103(2), C.R.S. 1973. Under the choice of law rule applicable by statute to URESA proceedings, section 14-5-108, C.”
People v. Brandyberry, 812 P.2d 674 (Colo. Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 2× “, §§ 14-5-103, 14-6-110, 14-6-101, C.R.S. (1987 Repl.”
Ostermiller v. Spurr, 968 P.2d 940 (Wyo. 1998). · cites it 2× “Section 14-5-103, C.R.S. (1996 Cum. Supp.”
Dewar v. LeNard, 653 P.2d 82 (Colo. Ct. App. 1982). · cites it 5× “” Section 14-5-103(14), C.R.S.1973. Section 14-5-119(2), C.”
Henry v. Knight, 746 P.2d 1375 (Colo. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 2× “Section 14-5-103(2) and 14-5-110, C.R.S. We are convinced, however, from our consideration of the act as a whole, and an analysis of the differences among the procedures provided therein, that the matter of arrearages can only be dealt with under the alternative registration…”
People ex rel. Van Meveren v. Dist. Court in & for the Cnty. of Larimer, 638 P.2d 1371 (Colo. 1982). · cites it 7× “1 One of the matters involved the claim of Kay Jarvis, a resident of Arizona and an obligee as defined in section 14-5-103(6), C.R.S.1973, for child support payments from George Holder, a resident of Loveland and an obligor as defined in section 14-5-103(7), C.”
Sherman v. City of Colorado Springs Plan. Comm'n, 763 P.2d 292 (Colo. 1988). · cites it 2× “Section 14-5-103 of the Code stated “the procedure for review of development plans is specified in each zone, and shall be further detailed by planning department policy as needed.”
In re the Marriage of Sabala, 802 P.2d 1163 (Colo. Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 4× “Code, § 1682 (West 1982); § 14-5-103(2), C.R.S. (1987 Repl.Vol. 6B) and § 14-5-125, C.”
Sherman v. Colorado Springs Plan. Com'n, 763 P.2d 292 (Colo. 1988). · cites it 2× “Section 14-5-103 of the Code stated "the procedure for review of development plans is specified in each zone, and shall be further detailed by planning department policy as needed.”
People Ex Rel. Ak, 72 P.3d 402 (Colo. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 3× “Section 14-5-103, C.R.S.2002. Therefore, mother was free to pursue remedies provided by §§ 19-6-104 and 26-13.”
Show all 14 citing cases →
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 14-5-103(14) — 1 case
Dewar v. LeNard, 653 P.2d 82 (Colo. Ct. App. 1982). “” Section 14-5-103(14), C.R.S.1973. Section 14-5-119(2), C.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 14-5-103(2) — 5 cases
Gruber v. Wallner, 598 P.2d 135 (Colo. 1979). “” See, section 14-5-103(2), C.R.S. 1973. Under the choice of law rule applicable by statute to URESA proceedings, section 14-5-108, C.”
Henry v. Knight, 746 P.2d 1375 (Colo. Ct. App. 1987). “Section 14-5-103(2) and 14-5-110, C.R.S. We are convinced, however, from our consideration of the act as a whole, and an analysis of the differences among the procedures provided therein, that the matter of arrearages can only be dealt with under the alternative registration…”
In re the Marriage of Sabala, 802 P.2d 1163 (Colo. Ct. App. 1990). “Code, § 1682 (West 1982); § 14-5-103(2), C.R.S. (1987 Repl.Vol. 6B) and § 14-5-125, C.”
Dewar v. LeNard, 653 P.2d 82 (Colo. Ct. App. 1982). “” Section 14-5-103(14), C.R.S.1973. Section 14-5-119(2), C.”
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Barta, 790 P.2d 895 (Colo. Ct. App. 1990).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 14-5-103(6) — 1 case
People ex rel. Van Meveren v. Dist. Court in & for the Cnty. of Larimer, 638 P.2d 1371 (Colo. 1982). “1 One of the matters involved the claim of Kay Jarvis, a resident of Arizona and an obligee as defined in section 14-5-103(6), C.R.S.1973, for child support payments from George Holder, a resident of Loveland and an obligor as defined in section 14-5-103(7), C.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 14-5-103(7) — 2 cases
Gruber v. Wallner, 598 P.2d 135 (Colo. 1979). “” See, section 14-5-103(2), C.R.S. 1973. Under the choice of law rule applicable by statute to URESA proceedings, section 14-5-108, C.”
People ex rel. Van Meveren v. Dist. Court in & for the Cnty. of Larimer, 638 P.2d 1371 (Colo. 1982). “1 One of the matters involved the claim of Kay Jarvis, a resident of Arizona and an obligee as defined in section 14-5-103(6), C.R.S.1973, for child support payments from George Holder, a resident of Loveland and an obligor as defined in section 14-5-103(7), C.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 14-5-103(8) — 2 cases
People ex rel. Van Meveren v. Dist. Court in & for the Cnty. of Larimer, 638 P.2d 1371 (Colo. 1982). “1 One of the matters involved the claim of Kay Jarvis, a resident of Arizona and an obligee as defined in section 14-5-103(6), C.R.S.1973, for child support payments from George Holder, a resident of Loveland and an obligor as defined in section 14-5-103(7), C.”
In re the Marriage of Pruyser, 851 P.2d 919 (Colo. Ct. App. 1993).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.