Colorado Revised Statutes
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 4-3-101 (2026)
Short title
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
This article may be cited as "Uniform Commercial Code -- Negotiable Instruments".
Source: L. 94: Entire article R&RE, p. 839, § 1, effective January 1, 1995.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 4-3-101 as it existed prior to 1994.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1983–2022 · leading case: West v. Roberts, 143 P.3d 1037 (Colo. 2006).
West v. Roberts, 143 P.3d 1037 (Colo. 2006). “(2006), and Negotiable Instruments, § 4-3-101, C.R.S. (2006), to Investment Securities, § 4-8-101, C.”
Haberl v. Bigelow, 855 P.2d 1368 (Colo. 1993). “As such, transactions involving the note are governed by article 3 of the Code, §§ 4-3-101 to -805, 2 C.R.S. (1992). Capital Investors Co.”
La Junta State Bank v. Travis, 727 P.2d 48 (Colo. 1986). “Article 3 of the Code, §§ 4-3-101 to -805, 2 C.R.S. (1973 & 1986 Supp.”
Simpson v. Milne, 677 P.2d 365 (Colo. Ct. App. 1983). “At the outset we note that because the liability of the guarantors was contained in a wholly separate guarantee agreement, and because none of the guarantors signed the bank note as guarantors, the issues presented herein are not controlled by the provisions of § 4-3-101, et seq.”
First Nat'l Bank v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 748 F. Supp. 1464 (D. Colo. 1990). “Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), enacted in Colorado as Colo.Rev.Stat. §§ 4-3-101 through 4-4-504 (1973), supply the applicable principles of law.”
Cole v. Farner, 749 P.2d 970 (Colo. Ct. App. 1987). “Thus, the law which governs is the Uniform Commercial Code, especially § 4-3-101, et seq., C.R.S., concerning commercial paper.”
Oakley v. Williams (D. Colo. 2022). “2016); see also Colo. Rev. Stat. §§ 4-3-101 et seq. A negotiable instrument is an unconditional promise or order to pay a fixed amount of money, with or without interest or other charges described in the promise or order, if it: (1) Is payable to bearer or to order at the time…”
Margason v. Roberts, 919 P.2d 818 (Colo. Ct. App. 1995). “2), and is applicable to all transactions *821 governed by the code. See §§ 4-2-101 to 4-11-102 (1992 Repl.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.