Del. C. » Title 6 — SUBTITLE I · Commerce and Trade · Part 7
Delaware Code

6 Del. C. § 2-714 (2026)

Buyer’s damages for breach in regard to accepted goods

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section DE-DELCdelcode.delaware.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) Where the buyer has accepted goods and given notification (subsection (3) of Section 2-607) he or she may recover as damages for any non-conformity of tender the loss resulting in the ordinary course of events from the seller’s breach as determined in any manner which is reasonable.

(2) The measure of damages for breach of warranty is the difference at the time and place of acceptance between the value of the goods accepted and the value they would have had if they had been as warranted, unless special circumstances show proximate damages of a different amount.

(3) In a proper case any incidental and consequential damages under the next section may also be recovered.

5A Del. C. 1953, §§  2-714;  55 Del. Laws, c. 349;  70 Del. Laws, c. 186, §  1; 
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2025–2025 · leading case: Superior Screen & Glass, Inc. v. Cahill & Vandersal (Del. Super. Ct. 2025).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Superior Screen & Glass, Inc. v. Cahill & Vandersal (Del. Super. Ct. 2025). · cites it 3× “57 6 Del. C. § 2-714(1). 17 between the value of the goods at the time and place of acceptance and the value of the goods if there had been no breach.”
— 6 Del. C. § 2-714(1) — 1 case
Superior Screen & Glass, Inc. v. Cahill & Vandersal (Del. Super. Ct. 2025). “57 6 Del. C. § 2-714(1). 17 between the value of the goods at the time and place of acceptance and the value of the goods if there had been no breach.”
— 6 Del. C. § 2-714(2) — 1 case
Superior Screen & Glass, Inc. v. Cahill & Vandersal (Del. Super. Ct. 2025). “57 6 Del. C. § 2-714(1). 17 between the value of the goods at the time and place of acceptance and the value of the goods if there had been no breach.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.