green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
48.2 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases ·
…the uncertainty caused by shelton v. secretary, department of corrections, 802 f.supp.2d 1289 (m.d.fla.2011)
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases ·
…uncertainty caused by shelton v. secretary, department of corrections, 802 f.supp.2d 1289 (m.d.fla.2011)
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 2012 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2012
2019
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
McKenzie v. United States Tennis Association Incorporated
an exception exists when the employee purported to act on behalf of the employer or when the employee was aided by the agency relationship.
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Charnesha Alexander v. USA
(2×)
also: Cited as authority (rule)
the sexual assault was not within the course and scope of her employment because the act was not in furtherance of her em- ployment.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Fleischman v. Forest Trail Academy, LLC
Assocs., Inc., 79 So. 3d 127, 132 (Fla. Dist.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Means v. Lyft, Inc.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Assoc., Inc., 79 So.3d 127, 132 (Fla. Dist.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
McKenzie v. United States Tennis Association Incorporated
Assocs., Inc., 79 So. 3d 127, 132 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012) (finding a counselor tasked with rehabilitating troubled youths at a group home, in part through “physical encouragement in the form of hugging and hand-holding,” was not aided by her employment in having sex with one of the youths outside of any counseling).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Sanguinetti v. Rambosk
Assocs., Inc., 79 So. 3d 127, 132 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012) (citation omitted).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
DeSimone v. Flagler County
Assocs., Inc., 79 So. 3d 127, 132 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012)).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Doe v. Willis
(2×)
Assocs., Inc., 79 So. 3d 127, 132 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012) (internal citation omitted).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Taylor v. Wagner
Assocs., Inc., 79 So. 3d 127, 132 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (citing Sussman v. Fla. E.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Reillo v. Alternate Health USA, Inc.
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
Assocs., Inc., 79 So. 3d 127, 132 (Fla. 5th Dist.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
CRMSuite Corporation v. General Motors Company
Assocs., Inc., 79 So. 3d 127, 132 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Angel Hunter v. United States
Assocs., Inc., 79 So. 3d 127, 132 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
G4s Secure Solutions USA, Inc., Etc. v. Golzar
(2×)
Assocs, Inc., 79 So. 3d 127, 132 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Cook v. Bay Area Renaissance Festival of Largo, Inc.
Assocs., Inc., 79 So.3d 127,131 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jamiese Gabriel Johnson v. All Construction Resources, Inc.
See Goss v. Human Services Assocs., Inc., 79 So. 3d 127, 132 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012) (“ ‘The general rule is that an employer cannot be held liable for the tortious or criminal acts of an employee, unless they were committed during the course of the employment to further a purpose or interest . . . of the employer.’ The question of whether an employee is acting within the course and scope of employment, where the facts are not in dispute, is that of law.”) (internal citations omitted)); Sussman v. Fla. East Coast Props., Inc., 557 So. 2d 74, 75-76 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) (“The conduct of an e…
discussed
Cited "see"
Roche v. State
See Smith v. State, 79 So.3d 127 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012); Little v. State, 77 So.3d 722 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); Adams v. State, 76 So.3d 367 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (holding that section 893.13, as amended by section 893.101, Florida Statutes (2002), is constitutional); see also Flagg v. State, 74 So.3d 138, 141 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (citing State v. Adkins, 71 So.3d 184 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) [review granted, 71 So.3d 117 (Fla.2011) ], and acknowledging “the uncertainty caused by Shelton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, 802 F.Supp.2d 1289 (M.D.Fla.2011)]” but reaffirming its view that section 893.13 …
discussed
Cited "see"
Walker v. State
See Smith v. State, 79 So.3d 127 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012); Little v. State, 77 So.3d 722 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); Adams v. State, 76 So.3d 367 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (holding that section 893.13, as amended by section 893.101, Florida Statutes (2002), is constitutional); see also Flagg v. State, 74 So.3d 138, 141 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (citing State v. Adkins, 71 So.3d 184 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) [review granted, 71 So.3d 117 (Fla.2011) ], and acknowledging “uncertainty caused by Shelton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, 802 F.Supp.2d 1289 (M.D.Fla.2011)” but reaffirming its view that section 893.13 is co…
discussed
Cited "see"
Gonzalez v. State
See Smith v. State, 79 So.3d 127 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012); Little v. State, 77 So.3d 722 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); Adams v. State, 76 So.3d 367 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (holding that section 893.13, as amended by section 893.101, Florida Statutes (2002), is constitutional); see also Flagg v. State, 74 So.3d 138, 141 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (citing State v. Adkins, 71 So.3d 184 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) [review granted, 71 So.3d 117 (Fla.2011) ], and acknowledging “the uncertainty caused by Shelton [v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, 802 F.Supp.2d 1289 (M.D.Fla.2011) ]” but reaffirming its view that section 893.1…
discussed
Cited "see"
Giraldo v. State
See Smith v. State, 79 So.3d 127 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012); Little v. State, 77 So.3d 722 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); Adams v. State, 76 So.3d 367 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (holding that section 893.13, as amended by section 893.101, Florida Statutes (2002), is constitutional); see also Flagg v. State, 74 So.3d 138, 141 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (citing State v. Adkins, 71 So.3d 184 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) [review granted, 71 So.3d 117 (Fla.2011) ], and acknowledging “uncertainty caused by [Shelton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, 802 F.Supp.2d 1289 (M.D.Fla.2011) ]” but reaffirming its view that section 893.13 is…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jerry W. SMITH, Appellant,
v.
the STATE of Florida, Appellee
v.
the STATE of Florida, Appellee
3D11-3108.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan 25, 2012.
Jerry W. Smith, in proper person., Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.
Shepherd, Cortiñas, Lagoa.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Adams v. State, 76 So.3d 367 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (holding that section 893.13, as amended by section 893.101, Florida Statutes (2002), is constitutional); Little v. State, 77 So.3d 722 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (same).