Florida Statute 22.05 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH

Chapter 22
EMERGENCY CONTINUITY OF GOVERNMENT

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 22.05

22.05 Enabling authority for emergency interim successors for local offices.—With respect to local offices, for which the legislative bodies of cities, towns, villages, townships, and counties may enact resolutions or ordinances relative to the manner in which vacancies will be filled or temporary appointments to office made, such legislative bodies are hereby authorized to enact resolutions or ordinances providing for emergency interim successors to offices of the aforementioned governmental units. Such resolutions and ordinances shall not be inconsistent with the provisions of ss. 22.01-22.10.

History.—s. 5, ch. 59-447.

F.S. 22.05 on Google Scholar

F.S. 22.05 on CourtListener

Amendments to 22.05

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 22.05

Total Results: 12

Transamerica Ins. Co. v. Barnett Bank of Marion County, NA

540 So. 2d 113, 7 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1356, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 107, 1989 Fla. LEXIS 170, 1989 WL 23390

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 1989 | Docket: 1688945

Cited 21 times | Published

(1965); White & Summers, Uniform Commercial Code § 22-5 (2d ed. 1980)). Adopting the position of the district

TIG Insurance v. Smart School

401 F. Supp. 2d 1334, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39530, 2005 WL 3199445

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 6, 2005 | Docket: 2367838

Cited 7 times | Published

110 (D.Mass.1998); See also Crouch on Insurance, § 22:5 at 21-25 (3d. ed.1997). Finally, the Court has

Transamerica Ins. Co. v. Barnett Bank of Marion County, NA

524 So. 2d 439, 5 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 879, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 774, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1158, 1988 WL 23644

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 1988 | Docket: 1701557

Cited 4 times | Published

(1965); White and Summers, Uniform Commercial Code § 22-5 (2d ed. 1980). [10] See Nat'l Surety Co. v. State

United States v. Mario Estrella

758 F.3d 1239, 2014 WL 3362166

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 10, 2014 | Docket: 368299

Cited 3 times | Published

is more analogous to Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.05(b)(2), which outlaws discharging a firearm at or

Lowy v. Roberts

453 So. 2d 886

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 1984 | Docket: 1162754

Cited 3 times | Published

is referred to as "spoliation," 2 Page on Wills § 22.5 (new rev. ed. 1960), has any legal effect whatever

Vitalia at Tradition Residents' Association, Inc. v. Vitalia at Tradition, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 2024 | Docket: 69369925

Published

“Owners” post- turnover. 1 Third, declaration section 22.5.2, dealing with the allocation of association

The City of West Palm Beach, Inc. v. Peter M. Haver

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 2021 | Docket: 60501706

Published

9. 3 E.C. Yokley, Zoning Law and Practice § 22-5 (3rd ed. 1967) (citing cases from several states)

Viscito v. Viscito

225 So. 3d 959, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 12036, 2017 WL 3611549

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 2017 | Docket: 6142250

Published

Phillip J. Padovano, 2 Fla. Prac., Appellate Practice § 22:5, n. 5 (2016 ed.). Section 61.16(1) makes this assessment

Classy Cycles, Inc. v. Bay County

201 So. 3d 779, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14507

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 28, 2016 | Docket: 60257072

Published

or scooters. See § 24-91(g), Bay County Code; § 22-05, Panama City Beach Code. With the exception of

Goldberg v. Companion Life Insurance

910 F. Supp. 2d 1350, 54 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2037, 2012 WL 6617119, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 179475

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 2012 | Docket: 65987151

Published

Maldonado & Joshua Rogers, Couch on Insurance 3d § 22:5 at 22-16 (West Group 2010). Using words similar

Bistricer v. Oceanside Acquisitions, LLC

937 So. 2d 786, 2006 WL 2614288

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 2006 | Docket: 1513079

Published

Philip J. Padovano, Florida Appellate Practice § 22.5 (2003 ed.). Accordingly, we treat this case as

General Electric Credit Corp. v. Diezel

551 So. 2d 520, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2069, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4900, 1989 WL 101299

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 1989 | Docket: 64645905

Published

F. Harper, F. James, O. Gray, The Law of Torts § 22.5, at 294-95 (1986), and (b) the defendant, by virtue