Florida Statute 29.004 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH

Chapter 29
COURT SYSTEM FUNDING

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 29.004

29.004 State courts system.—For purposes of implementing s. 14, Art. V of the State Constitution, the elements of the state courts system to be provided from state revenues appropriated by general law are as follows:

(1) Judges appointed or elected pursuant to chapters 25, 26, 34, and 35.

(2) Juror compensation and expenses.

(3) Reasonable court reporting and transcription services necessary to meet constitutional requirements.

(4) Construction or lease of facilities, maintenance, utilities, and security for the district courts of appeal and the Supreme Court.

(5) Court foreign language and sign-language interpreters and translators essential to comply with constitutional requirements.

(6) Expert witnesses who are appointed by the court pursuant to an express grant of statutory authority.

(7) Judicial assistants, law clerks, and resource materials.

(8) General magistrates, special magistrates, and hearing officers.

(9) Court administration.

(10) Case management. Case management includes:

(a) Initial review and evaluation of cases, including assignment of cases to court divisions or dockets.

(b) Case monitoring, tracking, and coordination.

(d) Service referral, coordination, monitoring, and tracking for treatment-based drug court programs under s. 397.334.

(e) Service referral, coordination, monitoring, and tracking for treatment-based mental health court programs under chapter 394.

Case management may not include costs associated with the application of therapeutic jurisprudence principles by the courts. Case management also may not include case intake and records management conducted by the clerk of court.

(11) Mediation and arbitration, limited to trial court referral of a pending judicial case to a mediator or a court-related mediation program, or to an arbitrator or a court-related arbitration program, for the limited purpose of encouraging and assisting the litigants in partially or completely settling the case prior to adjudication on the merits by the court. This does not include citizen dispute settlement centers under s. 44.201 and community arbitration programs under s. 985.16.

(12) Basic legal materials reasonably accessible to the public other than a public law library. These materials may be provided in a courthouse facility or any library facility.

(13) The Judicial Qualifications Commission.

(14) Offices of the appellate clerks and marshals and appellate law libraries.

History.—s. 4, ch. 2000-237; s. 40, ch. 2003-402; s. 3, ch. 2004-11; s. 14, ch. 2005-236; s. 104, ch. 2006-120; s. 1, ch. 2016-241.

F.S. 29.004 on Google Scholar

F.S. 29.004 on Casetext

Amendments to 29.004

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 29.004

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 29.004.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 29.004

Total Results: 20

VERONICA ROSS-WILLIAMS, etc. v. LINDA LEALI, RECEIVER

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-04-27

Snippet: supplementary initiated pursuant to section 56.29. 4 Proceedings supplementary provide a judgment creditor

JOHN G. MCGREGOR v. FOWLER WHITE BURNETT, P.A.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-12-01

Snippet: other subsections of section 56.29. 4 B. Principles of Statutory

Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General Re: Adult Use of Marijuana

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-04-29

Snippet: the same meaning as defined in Article X, Section 29. (4) “Marijuana accessories” means any equipment, products

Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General Re: Adult Use of Marijuana

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-04-22

Snippet: the same meaning as defined in Article X, Section 29. (4) “Marijuana accessories” means any equipment, products

Rodney Tyrone Lowe v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-10-19

Citation: 259 So. 3d 23

Snippet: Id.5 The State cross-appealed. 2 So. 3d at 29. 4. Lowe claimed that: (1) he was denied

Flatirons Bank v. the Alan W. Steinberg Limited Partnership

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-12-06

Snippet: 29 (4) The circumstances are such that it would be

Cal-Maine Foods/Broadspire v. Howard

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-07-26

Citation: 225 So. 3d 898, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10681, 2017 WL 3160125

Snippet: filed medical records in compliance with section 440.29(4), Florida Statutes. The admissible medical records

In Re: Amendments to Rules Regulating The Florida Bar (Biennial Petition Housekeeping) – Corrected Opinion

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-06-25

Snippet: (Definitions); 6-29.3 (Minimum Standards); and 6-29.4 (Recertification). After fully considering the

In Re AMENDMENTS TO RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR (BIENNIAL PETITION HOUSEKEEPING)

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-05-21

Citation: 164 So. 3d 1217, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 283, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 1122, 2015 WL 2401253

Snippet: (Definitions); 6-29.3 (Minimum Standards); and 6-29.4 (Recer-tification). After fully considering the

Steiner v. Guardianship of Steiner

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-03-04

Citation: 159 So. 3d 253, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 2968, 2015 WL 894259

Snippet: expert witness fees under s. 29.004(6).” S.B. 366; C.S./C.S./H.B. 5. Section 29.004(6), Florida Statutes (2014)

Vaughan v. Broward General Medical Center

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-12-19

Citation: 105 So. 3d 569, 2012 WL 6602797, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 21759

Snippet: correspondence was not a “medical report” under section 440.29(4), Florida Statutes (2011), and the Employer/Carrier

Young v. American Airlines

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-10-08

Citation: 100 So. 3d 1168, 2012 WL 4761500, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 17125

Snippet: exception to authentication provided by section 440.29(4), Florida Statutes, does not apply to independent

Tutor Time Child Care/Learning Centers v. Patterson

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-07-03

Citation: 91 So. 3d 264, 2012 WL 2545274, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 10685

Snippet: (JCC) erred by: (1) determining that section 440.29(4), Florida Statutes (2008), was not only a business

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2010-04-22

Snippet: elements of the state courts system identified in s. 29.004 and county funding for local requirements under

Smith v. Florida Department of Corrections

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-01-25

Citation: 27 So. 3d 124, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 546, 2010 WL 255984

Snippet: ...” § 960.29(l)(d), Fla. Stat.; see also § 960.29(4), Fla. Stat. (stating that the civil restitution

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2008-09-02

Snippet: elements of thestate courts system identified in s. 29.004 and county funding for localrequirements under

Wavestone Properties v. Fortune Development

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-03-26

Citation: 978 So. 2d 830

Snippet: regarding Wavestone's financial matters. See id. § 56.29(4). By separate motion, Fortune also moved to implead

The Florida Bar v. Brownstein

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-03-29

Citation: 953 So. 2d 502, 32 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 119, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 560, 2007 WL 924171

Snippet: 630.00 403.11 01-29-04 Ck 8551 L.A.B.

Coral Imaging Services v. Geico Indem. Ins.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-10-04

Citation: 955 So. 2d 11, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 16469, 2006 WL 2819614

Snippet: 23(2)(a)3; § 27.34(2); § 27.711(3); § 28.241(3),(4); § 29.004(10)(d); § 39.012; § 39.013(2); § 44.06(2); § 63

Smith v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-07-26

Citation: 933 So. 2d 723, 2006 WL 2061259

Snippet: under the Criminal Punishment Code contained only 29.4 points and, thus, was well within the range that