Cases from cite.case.law:

LARYEA, v. B. SESSIONS, III, U. S., 871 F.3d 337 (5th Cir. 2017)

. . . Garcia-Lopez, 2007 WL 4699842, at *2 (BIA Nov. 2, 2007) (holding that a conviction under Texas Penal Code § 38.03 . . .

UNITED STATES v. MASSEY,, 858 F.3d 380 (5th Cir. 2017)

. . . force against a peace officer or another” within the meaning of the resisting arrest statute, section 38.03 . . . the Dobbs definition of “force” to affirm a defendant’s conviction of resisting arrest under section 38.03 . . . definitively calibrate the amount of force required for a violation of resisting arrest under section 38.03 . . . indication in either decision that the definition of force was intended to apply outside of section 38.03 . . . The TCCA did suggest that section 38.03 requires only "some kind of force,” Dobbs, 434 S.W.3d at 171, . . .

ALEXANDER, v. CITY OF ROUND ROCK, a, 854 F.3d 298 (5th Cir. 2017)

. . . TPC § 38.03(a) provides that a person commits an offense “if he intentionally prevents or obstructs a . . . The only argument the officers make as to the use of force requirement under TPC § 38.03(a) is that, . . . Texas courts have repeatedly held that merely using tactics to delay an arrest does not satisfy TPC § 38.03 . . . being arrested by putting a gun to his own head and threatening to commit suicide did not violate § 38.03 . . . The plain meaning of Section 38.03(a)’s text and the ample and longstanding Texas case law interpreting . . .

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. A. GOLDSTONE G. III E., 233 F. Supp. 3d 1169 (D.N.M. 2017)

. . . against the weight of the evidence and granting a new trial under Rule 59. 8 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 38.03 . . .

BROWN v. NUCOR CORPORATION, 785 F.3d 895 (4th Cir. 2015)

. . . Boeing Co., 456 F.3d 1183, 1201 (10th Cir.2006) (7.95 and 38.03 standard deviations); Lopez v. . . .

OSBORNE, v. HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS,, 97 F. Supp. 3d 911 (S.D. Tex. 2015)

. . . Pen.Code § 38.03. . . . Pen.Code § 38.03(a). . . . Id. § 38.03(b). “In Texas, the act of resisting can supply probable cause for the arrest itself.” . . . Based on this undisputed testimony, Deputy Fair had probable cause to arrest Osborne under § 38.03(a) . . . Osborne argues that he lacked the mens rea to commit this crime, but § 38.03(a) is not a specific-intent . . .

UNITED STATES v. BERRY, 25 F. Supp. 3d 931 (N.D. Tex. 2014)

. . . Detective Martinez is apparently referring to section 38.03(a) of the Texas Penal Code. . . . The plain language of section 38.03(a) and the statutory definition of arrest clearly contemplate a " . . .

J. METYK S. a v. KEYCORP L. C. B. W. E. L., 560 F. App'x 540 (6th Cir. 2014)

. . . By 2009, KeyCorp’s stock price had dropped 78%, from $38.03 per share to $8.48 per share. . . .

WALSH, v. TEHACHAPI UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT,, 997 F. Supp. 2d 1071 (E.D. Cal. 2014)

. . . Larson, 2 Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law § 38.03 (2011); see also Bradshaw, supra, [Suicide as compensable . . .

RAMIREZ, v. MARTINEZ,, 716 F.3d 369 (5th Cir. 2013)

. . . officer’s detaining grip, whether by pushing or pulling, may be guilty of resisting arrest under section 38.03 . . . to shake off an officer’s detaining grip could amount to force against that officer [under section 38.03 . . . officer’s detaining grip, whether by pushing or pulling, may be guilty of resisting arrest under Section 38.03 . . . Penal Code Ann. § 38.03 (West 2009). . . . .

B. KEALOHA, v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS U. S. i Co., 713 F.3d 521 (9th Cir. 2013)

. . . Larson, 2 Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law § 38.03 (2011); see also Bradshaw, supra, 15 A.L.R.3d 616 . . .

NEWMAN, v. GUEDRY, 703 F.3d 757 (5th Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 38.03 (resisting unlawful arrest a misdemeanor). . . . On appeal, the officers assert that Newman violated Texas Penal Code § 38.03 — Resisting Arrest, Search . . .

STATEN, v. TATOM,, 465 F. App'x 353 (5th Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 38.03 (Vernon 2011). . . .

VILLAFRANCA, v. UNITED STATES, 587 F.3d 257 (5th Cir. 2009)

. . . . § 38.03. . . . Villafranca argues that under § 38.03 resisting arrest is only a crime when a peace officer's attempted . . .

SPENCER, v. RAU,, 542 F. Supp. 2d 583 (W.D. Tex. 2007)

. . . . § 38.03(a) (Vernon 2007); failing to comply with police orders according to San Antonio City Code § . . .

STEPHENS, v. S. A. SCOTT, F. J. S. G. A., 244 F. App'x 603 (5th Cir. 2007)

. . . Penal Code § 38.03(a). . . .

CARPENTER v. BOEING COMPANY, v., 456 F.3d 1183 (10th Cir. 2006)

. . . disparities in overtime adverse to women ranged between a low of 17.06 standard deviations and a high of 38.03 . . . whose statistical significance ranged from 7.95 standard deviations (weekend overtime during 2002) to 38.03 . . .

POLITE, v. STATE, 933 So. 2d 587 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . . § 38.03(a) (Vernon 2005); Utah Code Ann. 76-8-305(1) (West 2005); Vt. Stat. . . .

ORTIZ, v. LIVINGSTON,, 420 F. Supp. 2d 670 (W.D. Tex. 2006)

. . . Ann. art. 38.03 (Vernon 1998) (setting forth the presumption of innocence and reasonable-doubt standard . . . Ann. art 38.03. . Teague v. . . .

M. BARLOW, MONCEBAIZ, v. OWENS, II,, 400 F. Supp. 2d 980 (S.D. Tex. 2005)

. . . . § 38.03 (Vernon 2003), which makes it a misdemeanor to resist arrest. . . . Moncebaiz may not have violated § 38.03 because a touch on his arm may not have constituted an arrest . . .

In CAFETERIA OPERATORS, L. P., 299 B.R. 400 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2003)

. . . . § 38.03 at 38-2 (1981) (proceeds includes "property into which the prepetition property is converted . . .

CARMELL v. TEXAS, 529 U.S. 513 (U.S. 2000)

. . . Ann., Art. 38.03 (Vernon Supp. 2000). . . .

ARNDT, v. SECURITY BANK S. S. B. EMPLOYEES PENSION PLAN, 182 F.3d 538 (7th Cir. 1999)

. . . Mamorsky, Employee Benefits Handbook ¶ 38.03(2)(c) (1998). . . .

RICHMOND, v. STIGILE,, 22 F. Supp. 2d 476 (D. Md. 1998)

. . . When the installment deduction was made, plaintiff had $38.03 in his prison aecotmt of which $13.03 was . . .

ESTATE OF M. BRATTON, M. v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE CO., 24 F. Supp. 2d 667 (N.D. Miss. 1998)

. . . According to the plaintiffs figures, premiums to Larry Bratton each month resulted in a total amount of $38.03 . . .

CASHMAN HOLDINGS, INC. f k a Co. a a v. E. CAMPBELL, v. CASHMAN, a a J. a a E. a M. a M. a LLC, a L. a E. CAMPBELL, a v. CASHMAN, a LLC, a, 177 F.R.D. 664 (D. Minn. 1998)

. . . He argues that the portion of Minn.R.Civ.P. 38.03 from which this court reasoned that Minnesota required . . . were required to make an express demand for a jury trial because they were required by Minn.R.Civ.P. 38.03 . . .

REALTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. v. NOMURA SECURITIES,, 939 F. Supp. 572 (N.D. Ohio 1996)

. . . Jacobs, 5B Litigation and Practice Under Rule 10b-5 § 38.03[dd][ii] at 2-386 (release # 26, 6/1991) ( . . .

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. LIFE PARTNERS, INCORPORATED D., 87 F.3d 536 (D.C. Cir. 1996)

. . . Jacobs, Litigation Under Rule 10b-5, § 38.03[b][I] at 2-212, § 38.03[b][v], at 2-258 (1996) (quoting . . .

In EXTRADITION OF LAHORIA, 932 F. Supp. 802 (N.D. Tex. 1996)

. . . 20.03, 20.04 Assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty IPC 353 111 38.03 . . .

SWENSON v. CULBERSON COUNTY,, 925 F. Supp. 478 (W.D. Tex. 1996)

. . . . § 38.03. La-garde was also charged -with disobeying a police officer and resisting arrest. . . .

In M. MINTZ,, 192 B.R. 313 (Bankr. D. Mass. 1996)

. . . . § 38.03 at 38-2 (1981) (proceeds includes “property into which the prepetition property is converted . . .

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. LIFE PARTNERS, INC. D., 898 F. Supp. 14 (D.D.C. 1995)

. . . Jacobs Litigation Under Rule 10b-5 § 38.03[b][v] esp. n. 87-88 (citing Emisco Industries, Inc. v. . . . Jacobs, § 38.03[b][ii] and [b][v] esp. n. 87. . . .

E. BOOTH, v. BROWN,, 8 Vet. App. 109 (Vet. App. 1995)

. . . timely handled upon receipt”); and VA Adjudication Procedure Manual, M21-1, Part IV, paras. 38.02, 38.03 . . .

R. ROBINETTE, v. BROWN,, 8 Vet. App. 69 (Vet. App. 1995)

. . . remanded cases are properly and timely handled upon receipt”); and Manual M21-1, Part IV, paras. 38.02, 38.03 . . .

MASON, v. BROWN,, 8 Vet. App. 44 (Vet. App. 1995)

. . . and timely handled upon receipt”); VA Ajdjudioation Procedure Manual, M21-1, Part IV, paras. 38.02, 38.03 . . .

SHIPWASH, v. BROWN,, 8 Vet. App. 218 (Vet. App. 1995)

. . . timely handled upon receipt”); and VA Adjudication PROCEDURE Manual, M21-1, Part IV, paras. 38.02, 38.03 . . .

P. ALLDAY, v. BROWN,, 7 Vet. App. 517 (Vet. App. 1995)

. . . receipt”), and VA Adjudioation ProCEduRE Manual, M21-1 [hereinafter Manual M21-1], Part IV, paras. 38.02, 38.03 . . . and in accordance with VBIA § 302, the Hickman memorandum, and Manual 21-1, Part IV, paras. 38.02, 38.03 . . .

G. BLOCK, v. BROWN,, 7 Vet. App. 343 (Vet. App. 1994)

. . . Oct. 8, 1994) (same); see also VA Adjudication PROCEDURE Manual, M21-1, Part IV, paras. 38.02, 38.03 . . .

L. COOPERMAN, L. s s a v. R. G. BARRY CORPORATION,, 141 F.R.D. 132 (D. Minn. 1992)

. . . Instead, jury demands in state court are governed by Minn.R. of Civ.P. 38.03, which requires the filing . . .

B. MISHKIN, v. PEAT, MARWICK, MITCHELL CO., 744 F. Supp. 531 (S.D.N.Y. 1990)

. . . Jacobs, Litigation and Practice Under Rule 10b-5, § 38.03[a][i] at 2-146-47 (1989). . . .

In Re BUMPER SALES, INC. UNSECURED CREDITORS COMMITTEE, v. MAREPCON FINANCIAL CORPORATION, t a In Re BUMPER SALES, INC. UNSECURED CREDITORS COMMITTEE, v. MAREPCON FINANCIAL CORPORATION, t a, 116 B.R. 1430 (4th Cir. 1990)

. . . . § 38.03 at 38-2 (1981) (proceeds includes “property into which the prepetition property is converted . . .

LOZANO, v. SMITH,, 718 F.2d 756 (5th Cir. 1983)

. . . Resisting arrest is made an offense by section 38.03, but is a felony only if a deadly weapon is used . . .

In F. RUSSO, J. GROSS, F. v. F. RUSSO, 18 B.R. 257 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 1982)

. . . automatically operates to adjudicate that person a bankrupt in “all” cases. 2A Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 38.03 . . . to make a separate order of adjudication in voluntary bankruptcy cases. 2A Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 38.03 . . .

BUGHER v. SOUTHLAND FABRICATORS AND ERECTORS, INC., 452 F. Supp. 870 (W.D. La. 1978)

. . . March. 1975: Mike Lukasheay 83.50 25.05 20.88 4.17 James Swaney 36 10.80 9.00 1.80 Boyle Withers 126.75 38.03 . . .

F. ELWARD, v. UNITED STATES, 420 F. Supp. 840 (N.D. Ill. 1976)

. . . of the 57-60 was 58.5 which when multiplied by the face of $65 for the new bonds equalled a value of 38.03 . . .

W. Jr. M. v., 66 T.C. 235 (T.C. 1976)

. . . Name of farm Total acres Total land cost Nesselrode_ 320.00 $31,390 Ball_ 160.00 30,000 Home Place_ 38.03 . . .

E. UPPGREN v. EXECUTIVE AVIATION SERVICES, INC. a a a, 326 F. Supp. 709 (D. Md. 1971)

. . . Morton, 426 S.W.2d 554 (Tex.1968); see also Frumer and Friedman, supra, § 38.03, footnotes 4 and 5, pages . . .

WHITAKER, v. HARVELL- KILGORE CORPORATION WHITAKER, v. HARVELL- KILGORE CORPORATION, 424 F.2d 549 (5th Cir. 1970)

. . . Kaiser Jeep Corp., 40 F.R.D. 89, 91-92, (D.S.C. 1966); 3 Frumer & Friedman, Product Liability § 38.03 . . .

ST. JOE PAPER COMPANY, a v. I. BROWN, H. G. O. Jr. E. O. Jr. a, 210 So. 2d 725 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

. . . submitted an exhibit reflecting its view of “just value” per acre on the same farm property to range from $38.03 . . .

In COLBY MILLING, INC., 281 F. Supp. 689 (W.D. Wis. 1968)

. . . this issue, the answer to which appears to be “not clear”. 2 Collier on Bankruptcy (14th ed., 1966) § 38.03 . . .

STUBBLEFIELD a v. JOHNSON- FAGG, INC. a, 379 F.2d 270 (10th Cir. 1967)

. . . Co., 32 Ill.2d 612, 210 N.E.2d 182, 188 (1965). . 3 Framer & Friedman, Products Liability §§ 38.02, 38.03 . . .

ARIZONA v. CALIFORNIA, 547 U.S. 150 (U.S. 1963)

. . . 5 19S 21W 38.36 SWV4SWV4... 5 19S 21W 39.80 Part Lot 1...... 7 19S 21W 50.68 NW*/4 NWV4.. 8 19S 21W 38.03 . . .

THERMO- STITCH, INC. v. CHEMI- CORD PROCESSING CORP. Co., 294 F.2d 486 (5th Cir. 1961)

. . . For a summary of jury trial practice in the federal courts prior to 1938 see 5 Moore, supra, § 38.03. . . .

In NATIONAL RADIATOR CO., 29 F. Supp. 804 (W.D. Pa. 1939)

. . . The Special Master recommended the allowance of $750 for compensation and $38.03 for reimbursement of . . .

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)