Syfert Injury Law Firm

T.R.-B. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-01-26

Snippet: parental rights have been terminated. Section 63.037, Florida Statutes (2021), exempts these adoptions

B.S., Grandmother of P.S.A. and W.H.A., etc. v. Department of Children and Families

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-04-25

Citation: 246 So. 3d 479

Snippet: Chapter 63 of the Florida Statutes. However, section 63.037, Florida Statutes, provides that “[a] case in which

Department of Children & Families v. Statewide Guardian Ad Litem Program

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-02-29

Citation: 186 So. 3d 1084, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 2968, 2016 WL 869317

Snippet: shall be governed by s. 39.812 and this chapter.” § 63.037, Fla. Stat. (2015). “If parental rights to the

CM v. Department of Children and Families

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-02-08

Citation: 953 So. 2d 547, 2007 WL 412790

Snippet: ("Grandparent's right to adopt"). See generally §§ 39.812, 63.037-.235, Fla. Stat. (2006); Y.H. v. F.L.H., 784 So

Dept. of Children and Family Servs. v. Ps

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-07-03

Citation: 932 So. 2d 1195

Snippet: post-termination adoptions is section 63.037, Florida Statutes (2005), which states: 63.037 Proceedings applicable to

Buckner v. FAMILY SERVICES OF CENT. FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-07-23

Citation: 876 So. 2d 1285, 2004 WL 1635858

Snippet: child's adoption pursuant to chapter 63. Section 63.037, Florida Statutes (2003), provides that adoptions

IB v. Department of Children and Families

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-06-04

Citation: 876 So. 2d 581, 2004 WL 1228862

Snippet: is governed by chapter 63, as limited under s. 63.037. (emphasis added) Chapter 63 specifically provides:

State v. Rolle

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-03-01

Citation: 560 So. 2d 1154, 1990 WL 20560

Snippet: States, 412 U.S. 837, 843-46, 93 S.Ct. 2357, 2361-63, 37 L.Ed.2d 380 (1973) (unexplained possession of recently

Vasquez v. Stark

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1964-11-24

Citation: 169 So. 2d 37

Snippet: PER CURIAM. Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on the 27th day of August, 1963 (155 So.2d 905) reversing the judgment of the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, by its opinion and judgment filed September 30, 1964 and mandate dated No*38vember 12, 1964, 168 So.2d 140, now lodged in this court, quashed this court’s judgment

Vasquez v. Stark

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1963-08-27

Citation: 155 So. 2d 905, 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3085

Snippet: BARKDULL, Chief Judge. The appellant brought the instant action in the trial court, seeking to recover damages for a personal injury allegedly received when the vehicle in which she was riding [which had come to a stop because of interference in traffic] was struck from the rear by a vehicle being driven by appellee Linda Lee Stark. Linda Lee Stark was the only witness to testify as to how the accident occurred. She stated she was driving south on Biscayne Boulevard in the drizzling rain, following

Landis, Atty.-Gen'l. Ex Rel. Quigg v. Reeve

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1932-06-18

Citation: 142 So. 654, 106 Fla. 28

Snippet: 485,77 N.E. 155; Eastman vs. Householder, 45 Kan. 63, 37 P. 989; Donovan vs. Board of Police Com'rs of City