Arrestable Offenses under F.S. 63.212
M = misdemeanor · F = felony · degree: F=1st S=2nd T=3rd§63.212(1a)FAMILY OFFENSEREMOVEDF · 3rd
§63.212(1a)FAMILY OFFENSEPLACE MINOR FOR ADOPTION OUTSIDE THE STATEF · 3rd
§63.212(1b)FAMILY OFFENSENONENTITY PLACE MINOR FOR ADOPTION W/I STATEF · 3rd
§63.212(1c)FAMILY OFFENSESELL OR SURRENDER CHILD FOR MONEY OR PROPERTYF · 3rd
§63.212(1d)FAMILY OFFENSESELL OR ASSIGN PARENTAL RIGHTS OF MINORF · 3rd
§63.212(1e)FAMILY OFFENSEASSIST IN ILLEGAL ADOPTION PRACTICESF · 3rd
§63.212(1f)BRIBERYCHARGE OR ACCEPT FEE FOR ADOPTION REFERRALF · 3rd
§63.212(1g)PUBLIC ORDER CRIMESADV MINOR FOR ADOP FAIL INCL FL LIC OR BAR NUMM · 2nd
§63.212(1g)FAMILY OFFENSEASSIST WITH PLACING AD OR LISTING FOR ADOPTIONM · 2nd
§63.212(1g)PUBLIC ORDER CRIMESNONENTITY ADVERTISE MINOR FOR ADOPTIONM · 2nd
§63.212(1h)FAMILY OFFENSECONTRACT PURCH SELL CHILD FETUS FOR CONSIDF · 3rd
§63.212(2)FAMILY OFFENSEADOPTION DECEPTION LT 0M · 2nd
§63.212(2)FAMILY OFFENSEADOPTION DECEPTION GT 0F · 3rd
§63.212(2a)FAMILY OFFENSEPROVIDE FALSE WITHHOLD ADOPTION INFORMATIONM · 2nd
§63.212(2b)FAMILY OFFENSEFAIL TO DISCLOS PREGNANCY BENEFITS RE ADOPTIONM · 2nd
§63.212(2c)FAMILY OFFENSEREPEALED 2008-151M · 2nd
§63.212(4)FAMILY OFFENSEENTITY FAIL TO REPORT PLACEMENT OF MINORF · 3rd
§63.212(5)FAMILY OFFENSEUNLAWFUL ADOPTION PLACEMENT FEESF · 3rd
§63.212(6)FAMILY OFFENSECOUNSEL MOTHER TO LEAVE ST GIVE BIRTH FOR FEEF · 3rd
§63.212(7)FAMILY OFFENSEFAIL TO DISCLOSE HOME STUDY/INVESTIGATIONF · 3rd
§63.212(8)PUBLIC ORDER CRIMESREMOVEDM · 2nd
§63.212(8)PUBLIC ORDER CRIMESVIOL PROHIB ADOPT ACT ADVERT MINORM · 2nd
§63.212(8)FAMILY OFFENSEREMOVEDF · 3rd
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
18
cases (
1 in the last 5 years), 1985–2025 · leading case:
Trushin v. State, 475 So. 2d 1290 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).
Trushin v. State, 475 So. 2d 1290 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).
· cites it 10× “Trushin pled not guilty and moved to dismiss the information on the ground that section 63.212 was unconstitutional. The trial court denied the motion.”
In Re Adoption of a Minor Child, 593 So. 2d 185 (Fla. 1991).
· cites it 2× “§ 63.212(3) (making it unlawful for an intermediary to fail to file the requisite reports); id.”
In Re Adoption of Baby EAW, 658 So. 2d 961 (Fla. 1995).
“See § 63.212(1)(i)2.a., Fla. Stat. (1993). In other words, even in the clearest example of a willful abandonment in writing by a natural mother, she is given a chance to change her mind.”
J.S. v. S.A., 912 So. 2d 650 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005).
· cites it 4× “See § 63.212(8), Fla. Stat. (2004). Since every adoption involves the placement of a child and only adoption entities are allowed to place, it logically follows that an adoption entity must be involved in every non-relative/step-parent adoption.”
C.S. v. S.H., 671 So. 2d 260 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).
· cites it 2× “To allow the adoption here is also contrary to subsection 63.212(l)(c), Florida Statutes (1995), which provides that "it is unlawful for any person except [HRS], an agency, or any intermediary to place or attempt to place within the state, the child for adoption unless the child…”
Peregood v. Cosmides, 663 So. 2d 665 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).
“, for the father to give up his parental rights to the child in exchange for the sum of 0 per month (which amounts to 8,000 during the period of Michael's minority), smacks of a violation of section 63.212(1)(i) and may be void under Florida law.”
Brod v. Matter of an Adoption, 522 So. 2d 973 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).
· cites it 10× “It is section 63.212, however, that applies the coup de grace to any semblance of coherence regarding the proper activities of an intermediary on behalf of adoptive parents in regard to payment of the natural mother's expenses.”
G.W.B. v. J.S.W., 658 So. 2d 961 (Fla. 1995).
“See § 63.212(l)(i)2.a., Fla.Stat. (1993). In other words, even in the clearest example of a willful abandonment in writing by a natural mother, she is given a chance to change her mind.”
Roe v. Butterworth, 958 F. Supp. 1569 (S.D. Fla. 1997).
· cites it 2× “Respondent, however, has pointed to twothe sale of children and the sale of organs.”
— 63.212(1) — 1 case
— 63.212(1)(a) — 1 case
Trushin v. State, 475 So. 2d 1290 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).
“Trushin pled not guilty and moved to dismiss the information on the ground that section 63.212 was unconstitutional. The trial court denied the motion.”
— 63.212(1)(b) — 1 case
Js v. Sa, 912 So. 2d 650 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005).
— 63.212(1)(c) — 1 case
Cs v. Sh, 671 So. 2d 260 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).
— 63.212(1)(d) — 2 cases
Brod v. Matter of an Adoption, 522 So. 2d 973 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).
“It is section 63.212, however, that applies the coup de grace to any semblance of coherence regarding the proper activities of an intermediary on behalf of adoptive parents in regard to payment of the natural mother's expenses.”
— 63.212(1)(i) — 2 cases
In Re Adoption of Baby EAW, 658 So. 2d 961 (Fla. 1995).
“See § 63.212(1)(i)2.a., Fla. Stat. (1993). In other words, even in the clearest example of a willful abandonment in writing by a natural mother, she is given a chance to change her mind.”
Peregood v. Cosmides, 663 So. 2d 665 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).
“, for the father to give up his parental rights to the child in exchange for the sum of 0 per month (which amounts to 8,000 during the period of Michael's minority), smacks of a violation of section 63.212(1)(i) and may be void under Florida law.”
— 63.212(3) — 1 case
In Re Adoption of a Minor Child, 593 So. 2d 185 (Fla. 1991).
“§ 63.212(3) (making it unlawful for an intermediary to fail to file the requisite reports); id.”
— 63.212(4) — 2 cases
In Re Adoption of a Minor Child, 593 So. 2d 185 (Fla. 1991).
“§ 63.212(3) (making it unlawful for an intermediary to fail to file the requisite reports); id.”
Brod v. Matter of an Adoption, 522 So. 2d 973 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).
“It is section 63.212, however, that applies the coup de grace to any semblance of coherence regarding the proper activities of an intermediary on behalf of adoptive parents in regard to payment of the natural mother's expenses.”
— 63.212(8) — 2 cases
J.S. v. S.A., 912 So. 2d 650 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005).
“See § 63.212(8), Fla. Stat. (2004). Since every adoption involves the placement of a child and only adoption entities are allowed to place, it logically follows that an adoption entity must be involved in every non-relative/step-parent adoption.”
Js v. Sa, 912 So. 2d 650 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005).
— 63.212(l)(b) — 1 case
J.S. v. S.A., 912 So. 2d 650 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005).
“See § 63.212(8), Fla. Stat. (2004). Since every adoption involves the placement of a child and only adoption entities are allowed to place, it logically follows that an adoption entity must be involved in every non-relative/step-parent adoption.”
— 63.212(l)(c) — 1 case
C.S. v. S.H., 671 So. 2d 260 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).
“To allow the adoption here is also contrary to subsection 63.212(l)(c), Florida Statutes (1995), which provides that "it is unlawful for any person except [HRS], an agency, or any intermediary to place or attempt to place within the state, the child for adoption unless the child…”
— 63.212(l)(d) — 1 case
— 63.212(l)(g) — 2 cases
— 63.212(l)(i) — 1 case
G.W.B. v. J.S.W., 658 So. 2d 961 (Fla. 1995).
“See § 63.212(l)(i)2.a., Fla.Stat. (1993). In other words, even in the clearest example of a willful abandonment in writing by a natural mother, she is given a chance to change her mind.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.