Cases from cite.case.law:

E. NOACK, v. STATE, 260 So. 3d 1172 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . .]" § 90.805, Fla. Stat.; see also Gosciminski v. State , 994 So.2d 1018, 1026 (Fla. 2008). . . .

JOSEPH, v. STATE, 250 So. 3d 113 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . the hearsay rule in Florida are the ones recognized by statutes such as sections 90.803, 90.804, and 90.805 . . .

MOSCATIELLO, v. STATE, 247 So. 3d 11 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . Section 90.805, Florida Statutes, allows the admission of hearsay statements within hearsay, as long . . .

C. GAYLE, v. STATE, 216 So. 3d 656 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . See § 90.805, Fla. Stat. (2015) (dealing with “[hjearsay within hearsay”); Henderson v. . . .

KASETA, v. STATE, 192 So. 3d 697 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . State, 135 So.3d 472, 476 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014); see also § 90.805, Fla. Stat. (2010). . . .

RIVERA, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF CITY OF TAMPA S GENERAL EMPLOYMENT RETIREMENT FUND,, 189 So. 3d 207 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . See § 90.805; Holborough v. State, 103 So.3d 22l, 223 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012); J.B.J. v. . . .

HUNTER, v. STATE, 174 So. 3d 1011 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . .” § 90.805, Fla.- Stat. (2012). Hunter correctly characterizes those of Mr. . . .

A. CALDWELL, Sr. v. STATE, 137 So. 3d 590 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . .” § 90.805, Fla. Stat. (2012). . . .

HENDERSON, v. STATE, 135 So. 3d 472 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . State, 994 So.2d 1018, 1026 (Fla.2008) (citing § 90.805, Fla. Stat. (2007)); Charles W. . . .

A. BROWNE, v. STATE, 132 So. 3d 312 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . the hearsay rule in Florida are the ones recognized by statutes such as sections 90.803, 90.804, and 90.805 . . .

HARTONG v. BERNHART, M. D. P. A. P. A., 128 So. 3d 858 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . (citing § 90.805, Fla. Stat. (2005); Smith v. State, 880 So.2d 730, 741 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004))). . . .

DIAZ, v. STATE, 106 So. 3d 515 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . State, 971 So.2d 280, 286 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (quoting § 90.805, Fla. Stat. (2006)). . . .

HOLBOROUGH, v. STATE Of, 103 So. 3d 221 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . See § 90.805, Fla. Stat. (2010). . . .

MORTIMER, v. STATE, 100 So. 3d 99 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . the hearsay rule in Florida are the ones recognized by statutes such as sections 90.803, 90.804, and 90.805 . . .

RUBRECHT v. CONE DISTRIBUTING, INC., 95 So. 3d 950 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Stoll, 762 So.2d at 876; § 90.805 (2009); see also Charles W. . . .

BENJAMIN, v. TANDEM HEALTHCARE, INC. a d b a a, 93 So. 3d 1076 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . .”); see also § 90.805, Fla. Stat. (2009). . . . statement met a hearsay exception or was based on personal knowledge, it was inadmissible under section 90.805 . . . Section 90.805, Florida Statutes (2009) provides: "Hearsay within hearsay is not excluded under s. 90.802 . . .

BDO SEIDMAN, LLP. v. BANCO ESPIRITO SANTO INTERNATIONAL,, 38 So. 3d 874 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Stoll, 762 So.2d at 876; § 90.805 (2009); see also Charles W. . . .

W. McWATTERS, v. STATE, 36 So. 3d 613 (Fla. 2010)

. . . See §§ 90.802, 90.805, Fla. Stat. (2006). . . .

WALDEN, v. STATE, 17 So. 3d 795 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . .” § 90.805, Fla. Stat. (2007). . . .

J. B. J. A v. STATE, 17 So. 3d 312 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Section 90.805, Florida Statutes (2008), provides that “hearsay within hearsay” may be admissible “provided . . .

THOMAS, v. STATE, 993 So. 2d 105 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . See § 90.805, Fla. . . . See § 90.805, Fla. Stat. (2007). Directly on point is our decision in Van Zant v. . . .

GOSCIMINSKI, v. STATE, 994 So. 2d 1018 (Fla. 2008)

. . . See § 90.805, Fla. Stat. (2007). . . .

C. LEIGHTY, v. STATE, 981 So. 2d 484 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . See § 90.805, Fla. Stat. . . .

LOVE, v. STATE, 971 So. 2d 280 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . . § 90.805, Fla. Stat. (2006). . . .

JOHNSON, v. STATE, 969 So. 2d 938 (Fla. 2007)

. . . . § 90.805, Fla. Stat. (2006). . . .

CARTER, v. STATE, 951 So. 2d 939 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . Water Fish Comm’n, 495 So.2d 806, 809 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) (quoting CHARLES EHRHARDT, FLORIDA EVIDENCE § 90.805 . . .

L. POWELL, v. STATE, 908 So. 2d 1185 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . See § 90.805; Smith v. State, 880 So.2d 730, 741 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). . . .

REICHENBERG, v. DAVIS,, 846 So. 2d 1233 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . . § 90.805, Fla. Stat. (2002); Harris, 495 So.2d at 809. Here, no exceptions apply. . . .

STATE v. RICHARDS,, 843 So. 2d 962 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . See § 90.805, Fla. Stat. . . . .

BROWN, v. STATE, 707 So. 2d 849 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . . § 90.805. . . .

J. CHANEY E. v. WINN DIXIE STORES, INC. a, 605 So. 2d 527 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . statement met a hearsay exception or was based on personal knowledge, it is inadmissible under section 90.805 . . .

GROPPER, v. BINDER, M. D. M. D., 558 So. 2d 499 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . State, 549 So.2d 179 (Fla.1989); § 90.805, Fla.Stat. (1987); § 620.615, Fla.Stat. (1985). Affirmed. . . .

HILL, v. STATE, 549 So. 2d 179 (Fla. 1989)

. . . .” § 90.805, Fla. Stat. (1985). . . .

JOHNSON, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES,, 546 So. 2d 741 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . State, 372 So.2d 502, 503 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979), § 90.805, Fla.Stat. (1987). . . .

JUSTE, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, STATE OF FLORIDA, OFR DPAF,, 520 So. 2d 69 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . See also Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence § 90.805 (2d ed. 1984); Van Zant v. . . .

HARRIS, v. GAME AND FRESH WATER FISH COMMISSION,, 495 So. 2d 806 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence § 90.805, at 563 (2d ed. 1984); Van Zant v. . . . Section 90.805, Florida Statutes (1983) restates the general rule and provides that hearsay within hearsay . . .