Florida Statute 90.805 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VII
EVIDENCE

Chapter 90
EVIDENCE CODE

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 90.805

90.805 Hearsay within hearsay.—Hearsay within hearsay is not excluded under s. 90.802, provided each part of the combined statements conforms with an exception to the hearsay rule as provided in s. 90.803 or s. 90.804.

History.—s. 1, ch. 76-237; s. 1, ch. 77-77; s. 22, ch. 78-361; s. 1, ch. 78-379.

F.S. 90.805 on Google Scholar

F.S. 90.805 on Casetext

Amendments to 90.805

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 90.805

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 90.805.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 90.805

Total Results: 20

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. NB SPORTS MASSAGE AND REHAB CORP. A/A/O DAISY DEPAULA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2021-07-28T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: under other exceptions to the hearsay rule. See § 90.805 (“Hearsay within hearsay is not excluded under

SHERARD ADAMS v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-07-24T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: by statutes such as sections 90.803, 90.804, and 90.805, Florida Statutes.” Mortimer v. State, 100 So.

Noack v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-12-27T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 260 So. 3d 1172

Snippet: with an exception to the hearsay rule[.]" § 90.805, Fla. Stat.; see also Gosciminski v. State , 994

Noack v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-12-27T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 260 So. 3d 1172

Snippet: with an exception to the hearsay rule[.]" § 90.805, Fla. Stat.; see also Gosciminski v. State , 994

Marvin E. Noack v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-12-26T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: conforms with an exception to the hearsay rule[.]” § 90.805, Fla. Stat.; see also Gosciminski v. State, 994

KEVIN JOSEPH v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-06-27T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: by statutes such as sections 90.803, 90.804, and 90.805, Florida Statutes[.]” Mortimer v. State, 100 So

ANTHONY MOSCATIELLO v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-06-06T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: and Gurino were unavailable to testify. Section 90.805, Florida Statutes, allows the admission of hearsay

KEVIN JOSEPH v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-04-25T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: by statutes such as sections 90.803, 90.804, and 90.805, Florida Statutes[.]” Mortimer v. State, 100 So

Gayle v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2017-04-19T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 216 So. 3d 656, 2017 WL 1403607, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5368

Snippet: of hearsay requiring a second exception. See § 90.805, Fla. Stat. (2015) (dealing with “[hjearsay within

Kaseta v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-06-03T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 192 So. 3d 697, 2016 WL 3127523, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8474

Snippet: 135 So.3d 472, 476 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014); see also § 90.805, Fla. Stat. (2010). Money’s alleged statement&#

Rivera v. Board of Trustees of the City of Tampa's General Employment Retirement Fund

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-02-26T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 189 So. 3d 207, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 2847, 2016 WL 746480

Snippet: objection in civil actions.' See § 90.805; Holborough v. State, 103 So.3d 22l,

Tush-ee Lewis Hunter v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-05-11T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 174 So. 3d 1011

Snippet: rule as provided in s. 90.803 or s. 90.804.” § 90.805, Fla.- Stat. (2012). Hunter correctly characterizes

Caldwell v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-04-30T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 137 So. 3d 590, 2014 WL 1686465, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 6214

Snippet: rule as provided in s. 90.803 or s. 90.804.” § 90.805, Fla. Stat. (2012). Hearsay is “a statement, other

Henderson v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-03-21T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 135 So. 3d 472, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 4216, 2014 WL 1133309

Snippet: State, 994 So.2d 1018, 1026 (Fla.2008) (citing § 90.805, Fla. Stat. (2007)); Charles W. Ehrhardt, Ehrhardt

Browne v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-01-22T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 132 So. 3d 312, 2014 WL 223094, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 585

Snippet: by statutes such as sections 90.803, 90.804, and 90.805, Florida Statutes (2010).” Mortimer, 100 So.3d

Hartong v. Bernhart

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2013-12-06T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 128 So. 3d 858, 2013 WL 6331606, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 19439

Snippet: statements conform to a hearsay exception.” (citing § 90.805, Fla. Stat. (2005); Smith v. State, 880 So.2d 730

Diaz v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2013-02-08T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 106 So. 3d 515, 2013 WL 466219, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 1999

Snippet: 971 So.2d 280, 286 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (quoting § 90.805, Fla. Stat. (2006)). To overcome a double hearsay

Holborough v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-11-28T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 103 So. 3d 221, 2012 WL 5933008, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20448

Snippet: said was hearsay falling under no exception. See § 90.805, Fla. Stat. (2010). The officer’s testimony was

Mortimer v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-08-29T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 100 So. 3d 99, 2012 WL 3711413, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14492

Snippet: by statutes such as sections 90.803, 90.804, and 90.805, Florida Statutes (2010). See Chavez, 25 So.3d

Rubrecht v. Cone Distributing, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-08-10T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 95 So. 3d 950, 2012 WL 3235164, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13354

Snippet: applicable hearsay exception. Stoll, 762 So.2d at 876; § 90.805 (2009); see also Charles W. Ehrhardt, Ehrhardt’