Florida Statute 100.371 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2024 Florida Statutes (including 2025 Special Session C)

Title IX
ELECTORS AND ELECTIONS

Chapter 100
GENERAL, PRIMARY, SPECIAL, BOND, AND REFERENDUM ELECTIONS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 100.371

100.371 Initiatives; procedure for placement on ballot.—

(1) Constitutional amendments proposed by initiative shall be placed on the ballot for the general election, provided the initiative petition has been filed with the Secretary of State no later than February 1 of the year the general election is held. A petition shall be deemed to be filed with the Secretary of State upon the date the secretary determines that valid and verified petition forms have been signed by the constitutionally required number and distribution of electors under this code.

(2) The sponsor of an initiative amendment shall, prior to obtaining any signatures, register as a political committee pursuant to s. 106.03 and submit the text of the proposed amendment to the Secretary of State, with the form on which the signatures will be affixed, and shall obtain the approval of the Secretary of State of such form. The Secretary of State shall adopt rules pursuant to s. 120.54 prescribing the style and requirements of such form. Upon filing with the Secretary of State, the text of the proposed amendment and all forms filed in connection with this section must, upon request, be made available in alternative formats.

(3)(a) A person may not collect signatures or initiative petitions for compensation unless the person is registered as a petition circulator with the Secretary of State.

(b) A citizen may challenge a petition circulator’s registration under this section by filing a petition in circuit court. If the court finds that the respondent is not a registered petition circulator, the court may enjoin the respondent from collecting signatures or initiative petitions for compensation until she or he is lawfully registered.

(4) An application for registration must be submitted in the format required by the Secretary of State and must include the following:

(a) The information required to be on the petition form under s. 101.161, including the ballot summary and title as approved by the Secretary of State.

(b) The applicant’s name, permanent address, temporary address, if applicable, and date of birth.

(c) An address in this state at which the applicant will accept service of process related to disputes concerning the petition process, if the applicant is not a resident of this state.

(d) A statement that the applicant consents to the jurisdiction of the courts of this state in resolving disputes concerning the petition process.

(e) Any information required by the Secretary of State to verify the applicant’s identity or address.

(5) All petitions collected by a petition circulator must contain, in a format required by the Secretary of State, a completed Petition Circulator’s Affidavit which includes:

(a) The circulator’s name and permanent address;

(b) The following statement, which must be signed by the circulator:

By my signature below, as petition circulator, I verify that the petition was signed in my presence. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Petition Circulator’s Affidavit and the facts stated in it are true.

(6) The division or the supervisor of elections shall make hard copy petition forms or electronic portable document format petition forms available to registered petition circulators. All such forms must contain information identifying the petition circulator to which the forms are provided. The division shall maintain a database of all registered petition circulators and the petition forms assigned to each. Each supervisor of elections shall provide to the division information on petition forms assigned to and received from petition circulators. The information must be provided in a format and at times as required by the division by rule. The division must update information on petition forms daily and make the information publicly available.

(7)(a) A sponsor that collects petition forms or uses a petition circulator to collect petition forms serves as a fiduciary to the elector signing the petition form, ensuring that any petition form entrusted to the petition circulator shall be promptly delivered to the supervisor of elections within 30 days after the elector signs the form. If a petition form collected by any petition circulator is not promptly delivered to the supervisor of elections, the sponsor is liable for the following fines:

1. A fine in the amount of $50 for each petition form received by the supervisor of elections more than 30 days after the elector signed the petition form or the next business day, if the office is closed. A fine in the amount of $250 for each petition form received if the sponsor or petition circulator acted willfully.

2. A fine in the amount of $500 for each petition form collected by a petition circulator which is not submitted to the supervisor of elections. A fine in the amount of $1,000 for any petition form not submitted if the sponsor or petition circulator acted willfully.

(b) A showing by the sponsor that the failure to deliver the petition form within the required timeframe is based upon force majeure or impossibility of performance is an affirmative defense to a violation of this subsection. The fines described in this subsection may be waived upon a showing that the failure to deliver the petition form promptly is based upon force majeure or impossibility of performance.

(8) If the Secretary of State reasonably believes that a person or entity has committed a violation of this section, the secretary may refer the matter to the Attorney General for enforcement. The Attorney General may institute a civil action for a violation of this section or to prevent a violation of this section. An action for relief may include a permanent or temporary injunction, a restraining order, or any other appropriate order.

(9) The division shall adopt by rule a complaint form for an elector who claims to have had his or her signature misrepresented, forged, or not delivered to the supervisor. The division shall also adopt rules to ensure the integrity of the petition form gathering process, including rules requiring sponsors to account for all petition forms used by their agents. Such rules may require a sponsor or petition circulator to provide identification information on each petition form as determined by the department as needed to assist in the accounting of petition forms.

(10) The date on which an elector signs a petition form is presumed to be the date on which the petition circulator received or collected the petition form.

(11)(a) An initiative petition form circulated for signature may not be bundled with or attached to any other petition. Each signature shall be dated when made and shall be valid until the next February 1 occurring in an even-numbered year for the purpose of the amendment appearing on the ballot for the general election occurring in that same year, provided all other requirements of law are met. The sponsor shall submit signed and dated forms to the supervisor of elections for the county of residence listed by the person signing the form for verification of the number of valid signatures obtained. If a signature on a petition is from a registered voter in another county, the supervisor shall notify the petition sponsor of the misfiled petition. The supervisor shall promptly verify the signatures within 60 days after receipt of the petition forms and payment of a fee for the actual cost of signature verification incurred by the supervisor. However, for petition forms submitted less than 60 days before February 1 of an even-numbered year, the supervisor shall promptly verify the signatures within 30 days after receipt of the form and payment of the fee for signature verification. The supervisor shall promptly record, in the manner prescribed by the Secretary of State, the date each form is received by the supervisor, and the date the signature on the form is verified as valid. The supervisor may verify that the signature on a form is valid only if:

1. The form contains the original signature of the purported elector.

2. The purported elector has accurately recorded on the form the date on which he or she signed the form.

3. The form sets forth the purported elector’s name, address, city, county, and voter registration number or date of birth.

4. The purported elector is, at the time he or she signs the form and at the time the form is verified, a duly qualified and registered elector in the state.

5. The signature was obtained legally, including that if a paid petition circulator was used, the circulator was validly registered under subsection (3) when the signature was obtained.

The supervisor shall retain all signature forms, separating forms verified as valid from those deemed invalid, for at least 1 year following the election for which the petition was circulated.

(b) Each supervisor shall post the actual cost of signature verification on his or her website and may increase such cost, as necessary, on February 2 of each even-numbered year. The division shall also publish each county’s current cost on its website. The division and each supervisor shall biennially review available technology aimed at reducing verification costs.

(c) On the last day of each month, or on the last day of each week from December 1 of an odd-numbered year through February 1 of the following year, each supervisor shall post on his or her website the total number of signatures submitted, the total number of invalid signatures, the total number of signatures processed, and the aggregate number of verified valid signatures and the distribution of such signatures by congressional district for each proposed amendment proposed by initiative, along with the following information specific to the reporting period: the total number of signed petition forms received, the total number of signatures verified, the distribution of verified valid signatures by congressional district, and the total number of verified petition forms forwarded to the Secretary of State.

(12) The Secretary of State shall determine from the signatures verified by the supervisors of elections the total number of verified valid signatures and the distribution of such signatures by congressional districts, and the division shall post such information on its website at the same intervals specified in paragraph (11)(c). Upon a determination that the requisite number and distribution of valid signatures have been obtained, the secretary shall issue a certificate of ballot position for that proposed amendment and shall assign a designating number pursuant to s. 101.161.

(13)(a) At the same time the Secretary of State submits an initiative petition to the Attorney General pursuant to s. 15.21, the secretary shall submit a copy of the initiative petition to the Financial Impact Estimating Conference. Within 75 days after receipt of a proposed revision or amendment to the State Constitution by initiative petition from the Secretary of State, the Financial Impact Estimating Conference shall complete an analysis and financial impact statement to be placed on the ballot of the estimated increase or decrease in any revenues or costs to state or local governments and the overall impact to the state budget resulting from the proposed initiative. The 75-day time limit is tolled when the Legislature is in session. The Financial Impact Estimating Conference shall submit the financial impact statement to the Attorney General and Secretary of State. If the initiative petition has been submitted to the Financial Impact Estimating Conference but the validity of signatures has expired and the initiative petition no longer qualifies for ballot placement at the ensuing general election, the Secretary of State must notify the Financial Impact Estimating Conference. The Financial Impact Estimating Conference is not required to complete an analysis and financial impact statement for an initiative petition that fails to meet the requirements of subsection (1) for placement on the ballot before the 75-day time limit, including any tolling period, expires. The initiative petition may be resubmitted to the Financial Impact Estimating Conference if the initiative petition meets the requisite criteria for a subsequent general election cycle. A new Financial Impact Estimating Conference shall be established at such time as the initiative petition again satisfies the criteria in s. 15.21(1).

(b) Immediately upon receipt of a proposed revision or amendment from the Secretary of State, the coordinator of the Office of Economic and Demographic Research shall contact the person identified as the sponsor to request an official list of all persons authorized to speak on behalf of the named sponsor and, if there is one, the sponsoring organization at meetings held by the Financial Impact Estimating Conference. All other persons shall be deemed interested parties or proponents or opponents of the initiative. The Financial Impact Estimating Conference shall provide an opportunity for any representatives of the sponsor, interested parties, proponents, or opponents of the initiative to submit information and may solicit information or analysis from any other entities or agencies, including the Office of Economic and Demographic Research.

(c) All meetings of the Financial Impact Estimating Conference shall be open to the public. The President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, jointly, shall be the sole judge for the interpretation, implementation, and enforcement of this subsection.

1. The Financial Impact Estimating Conference is established to review, analyze, and estimate the financial impact of amendments to or revisions of the State Constitution proposed by initiative. The Financial Impact Estimating Conference shall consist of four principals: one person from the Executive Office of the Governor; the coordinator of the Office of Economic and Demographic Research, or his or her designee; one person from the professional staff of the Senate; and one person from the professional staff of the House of Representatives. Each principal shall have appropriate fiscal expertise in the subject matter of the initiative. A Financial Impact Estimating Conference may be appointed for each initiative.

2. Principals of the Financial Impact Estimating Conference shall reach a consensus or majority concurrence on a clear and unambiguous financial impact statement, no more than 150 words in length, and immediately submit the statement to the Attorney General. Nothing in this subsection prohibits the Financial Impact Estimating Conference from setting forth a range of potential impacts in the financial impact statement. Any financial impact statement that a court finds not to be in accordance with this section shall be remanded solely to the Financial Impact Estimating Conference for redrafting. The Financial Impact Estimating Conference shall redraft the financial impact statement within 15 days.

3. If the Supreme Court has rejected the initial submission by the Financial Impact Estimating Conference and no redraft has been approved by the Supreme Court by 5 p.m. on the 75th day before the election, the following statement shall appear on the ballot: “The impact of this measure, if any, has not been determined at this time.”

(d) The financial impact statement must be separately contained and be set forth after the ballot summary as required in s. 101.161(1).

1. If the financial impact statement projects a net negative impact on the state budget, the ballot must include the statement required by s. 101.161(1)(b).

2. If the financial impact statement projects a net positive impact on the state budget, the ballot must include the statement required by s. 101.161(1)(c).

3. If the financial impact statement estimates an indeterminate financial impact or if the members of the Financial Impact Estimating Conference are unable to agree on the statement required by this subsection, the ballot must include the statement required by s. 101.161(1)(d).

(e)1. Any financial impact statement that the Supreme Court finds not to be in accordance with this subsection shall be remanded solely to the Financial Impact Estimating Conference for redrafting, provided the court’s advisory opinion is rendered at least 75 days before the election at which the question of ratifying the amendment will be presented. The Financial Impact Estimating Conference shall prepare and adopt a revised financial impact statement no later than 5 p.m. on the 15th day after the date of the court’s opinion.

2. If, by 5 p.m. on the 75th day before the election, the Supreme Court has not issued an advisory opinion on the initial financial impact statement prepared by the Financial Impact Estimating Conference for an initiative amendment that otherwise meets the legal requirements for ballot placement, the financial impact statement shall be deemed approved for placement on the ballot.

3. In addition to the financial impact statement required by this subsection, the Financial Impact Estimating Conference shall draft an initiative financial information statement. The initiative financial information statement should describe in greater detail than the financial impact statement any projected increase or decrease in revenues or costs that the state or local governments would likely experience if the ballot measure were approved. If appropriate, the initiative financial information statement may include both estimated dollar amounts and a description placing the estimated dollar amounts into context. The initiative financial information statement must include both a summary of not more than 500 words and additional detailed information that includes the assumptions that were made to develop the financial impacts, workpapers, and any other information deemed relevant by the Financial Impact Estimating Conference.

4. The Department of State shall have printed, and shall furnish to each supervisor of elections, a copy of the summary from the initiative financial information statements. The supervisors shall have the summary from the initiative financial information statements available at each polling place and at the main office of the supervisor of elections upon request.

5. The Secretary of State and the Office of Economic and Demographic Research shall make available on the Internet each initiative financial information statement in its entirety. In addition, each supervisor of elections whose office has a website shall post the summary from each initiative financial information statement on the website. Each supervisor shall include a copy of each summary from the initiative financial information statements and the Internet addresses for the information statements on the Secretary of State’s and the Office of Economic and Demographic Research’s websites in the publication or mailing required by s. 101.20.

(14) The Department of State may adopt rules in accordance with s. 120.54 to carry out the provisions of subsections (1)-(14).

(15) No provision of this code shall be deemed to prohibit a private person exercising lawful control over privately owned property, including property held open to the public for the purposes of a commercial enterprise, from excluding from such property persons seeking to engage in activity supporting or opposing initiative amendments.

History.—s. 15, ch. 79-365; s. 12, ch. 83-251; s. 30, ch. 84-302; s. 22, ch. 97-13; s. 9, ch. 2002-281; s. 3, ch. 2002-390; s. 3, ch. 2004-33; s. 28, ch. 2005-278; s. 4, ch. 2006-119; s. 25, ch. 2007-30; s. 1, ch. 2007-231; s. 14, ch. 2008-95; s. 23, ch. 2011-40; s. 3, ch. 2019-64; s. 3, ch. 2020-15; s. 13, ch. 2022-73.

F.S. 100.371 on Google Scholar

F.S. 100.371 on CourtListener

Amendments to 100.371

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 100.371

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S100.371 3 - ELECTION LAWS - INITIATIVE PETITION VIOLATION - M: S

Cases Citing Statute 100.371

Total Results: 47

Biddulph v. Mortham

89 F.3d 1491, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 18871, 1996 WL 400009

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 1, 1996 | Docket: 1427135

Cited 48 times | Published

secretary of state for approval. Fla.Stat.Ann. § 100.371(3) (West 1982). The secretary of state, through

Fulani v. Krivanek

973 F.2d 1539, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 24723

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 5, 1992 | Docket: 167148

Cited 39 times | Published

place initiatives on the ballot. See Fla.Stat. § 100.371 3 As Fulani points

Advisory Opinion Re Nonpartisa Com'n

926 So. 2d 1218

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 2006 | Docket: 467057

Cited 13 times | Published

complies with the statutory requirements of section 100.371(6), Florida Statutes (2005).[7] In response

Advisory Opinion Re Marriage Protection

926 So. 2d 1229, 2006 WL 721779

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 2006 | Docket: 466954

Cited 12 times | Published

Impact Statement to evaluate compliance with section 100.371 of the Florida Statutes (2005). We have jurisdiction

State Ex Rel. Citizens Proposition for Tax Relief v. Firestone

386 So. 2d 561

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 1980 | Docket: 477525

Cited 10 times | Published

petitioners seek relief from the provisions of section 100.371, Florida Statutes (1979), and Rule 1C-7.091

Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General re Use of Marijuana for Debilitating Medical Conditions

181 So. 3d 471, 2015 WL 9258263

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 2015 | Docket: 60252586

Cited 9 times | Published

Financial Impact Statement is in compliance with section 100.371(5), Florida Statutes (2015). We therefore approve

Browning v. Florida Hometown Democracy, Inc.

29 So. 3d 1053, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 120, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 217, 2010 WL 546768

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 2010 | Docket: 1185383

Cited 8 times | Published

that the signature-revocation provisions of section 100.371, Florida Statutes (2007), and associated implementing

Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General Re 1.35% Property Tax Cap, Unless Voter Approved

2 So. 3d 968, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 102, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 145, 2009 WL 217983

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 30, 2009 | Docket: 1643826

Cited 8 times | Published

exemption. In accordance with the requirements of section 100.371, Florida Statutes (2007), the Financial Impact

Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General Re Florida Growth Management Initiative Giving Citizens the Right to Decide Local Growth Management Plan Changes

2 So. 3d 118, 33 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 966, 2008 Fla. LEXIS 2391, 2008 WL 5245678

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 2008 | Docket: 1138710

Cited 7 times | Published

the financial impact statement complies with section 100.371, Florida Statutes (2008). I. FACTS The Smarter

Delgado v. Smith

861 F.2d 1489, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 14908, 1988 WL 127640

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 4, 1988 | Docket: 66240119

Cited 7 times | Published

sponsor may obtain any signatures. Fla.Stat.Ann. § 100.371(3). The Florida Secretary of State has promulgated

Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General re Water & Land Conservation

123 So. 3d 47

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 2013 | Docket: 60235099

Cited 6 times | Published

the financial impact statement complies with section 100.371, Florida Statutes (2012). Accordingly, we approve

Advisory Opin. Re Extending Sales Tax

953 So. 2d 471

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 2007 | Docket: 89773

Cited 6 times | Published

relating to each proposed amendment comport with section 100.371, Florida Statutes (2005). Article XI, section

Floridians Against Exp. Gambling v. Flpf

945 So. 2d 553

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 2006 | Docket: 1400923

Cited 4 times | Published

gatherers were not included, in violation of section 100.371, Florida Statutes, as amended by Chapter 97-13

Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General Re: Use of Marijuana for Certain Medical Conditions

132 So. 3d 786, 2014 WL 289984

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 2014 | Docket: 401476

Cited 3 times | Published

Financial Impact Statement is in compliance with section 100.371(5), Florida Statutes (2013). We therefore approve

Advisory Opinion to Attorney General

992 So. 2d 190, 2008 WL 4346396

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 2008 | Docket: 1389681

Cited 3 times | Published

statement to evaluate its compliance with section 100.371, Florida Statutes. In our initial decision

Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General Re Standards for Establishing Legislative District Boundaries

2 So. 3d 161, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 62, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 130, 2009 WL 196406

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 2009 | Docket: 1137443

Cited 2 times | Published

proposed by initiative pursuant to section 3. Section 100.371, Florida Statutes (2008), addresses financial

Miami-Dade County Board of County Commissioners v. an Accountable Miami-Dade

208 So. 3d 724, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14069

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 2016 | Docket: 4423581

Cited 1 times | Published

petition form to the Florida Division of Elections. § 100.371(2), Fla. Stat. (2016). The Division reviews the

Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General re Limits or Prevents Barriers to Local Solar Electricity Supply

177 So. 3d 235, 2015 WL 6387952

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 2015 | Docket: 60251164

Cited 1 times | Published

requirements of section 100.371(5), Florida. Statutes (2014). See § 101.161(1), Fla. Stat.; § 100.371(5), Fla

Dockery v. Hood

922 So. 2d 258, 2006 WL 176942

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 26, 2006 | Docket: 1683424

Cited 1 times | Published

with the trial court that the requirement of section 100.371, Florida Statutes (1997), regarding the names

Floridians Protecting Freedom, Inc. v. Kathleen C. Passidomo

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 21, 2024 | Docket: 69063219

Published

member from each chamber of the Legislature. § 100.371(13)(c)1., Fla. Stat. The financial impact

Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General Re: Raising Florida's Minimum Wage

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 9, 2020 | Docket: 16761649

Published

corresponding financial impact statement with section 100.371, Florida Statutes (2019). We invited briefing

ADVISORY OPINION TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL RE: VOTER CONTROL OF GAMBLING in Florida. Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General Re: Voter Control of Gambling in Florida (FIS)

215 So. 3d 1209

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 2017 | Docket: 4922811

Published

the financial impact statement complies with section 100.371, Florida Statutes (2016), BACKGROUND On May

ADVISORY OPINION TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL RE: VOTING RESTORATION AMENDMENT. Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General Re: Voting Restoration Amendment (FIS)

215 So. 3d 1202

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 2017 | Docket: 4922812

Published

constitutional amendment is in accordance with section 100.371, Florida Statutes (2016). The financial impact

Miami-Dade County Board of County Commissioners v. an Accountable Miami-Dade

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 2016 | Docket: 4423920

Published

petition form to the Florida Division of Elections. § 100.371(2), Fla. Stat. (2016). The Division reviews the

ADVISORY OPINION TO the ATTORNEY GENERAL Re RIGHTS OF ELECTRICITY CONSUMERS REGARDING SOLAR ENERGY CHOICE. Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General Re Rights of Electricity Consumers Regarding Solar Energy Choice (FIS)

188 So. 3d 822

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 2016 | Docket: 3049660

Published

Statement complies with the requirements of section 100.371(5),' Florida Statutes (2015). See § 101.161(1)

& SC15-2002 Advisory Opinion to The Attorney General Re: Use of Marijuana for Debilitating Medical Conditions & Advisory Opinion to The Attorney General Re: Use of Marijuana for Debilitating Medical Conditions (FIS)

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 2015 | Docket: 3022133

Published

Financial Impact Statement is in compliance with section 100.371(5), Florida Statutes (2015). We therefore approve

& SC15-890 Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General Re: Limits or Prevents Barriers to Local Solar Electricity Supply & Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General Re: Limits or Prevents Barriers to Local Solar Electricity Supply (FIS)

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 2015 | Docket: 2991651

Published

requirements of section 100.371(5), Florida Statutes (2014). See § 101.161(1), Fla. Stat.; § 100.371(5), Fla

Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General Re: Use of Marijuana for Certain Medical Conditions (Financial Impact Statement)

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 2014 | Docket: 401480

Published

Financial Impact Statement is in compliance with section 100.371(5), Florida Statutes (2013). We therefore

Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General Re Standards for Establishing Legislative District Boundaries

24 So. 3d 1198, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 669, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 2065, 2009 WL 4841065

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 2009 | Docket: 1648690

Published

statements to evaluate their compliance with section 100.371, Florida Statutes (2008). See Advisory Op.

Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General Re Referenda Required for Adoption & Amendment of Local Government Comprehensive Land Use Plans

14 So. 3d 224, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 402, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 1014, 2009 WL 1954716

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 2009 | Docket: 1650692

Published

statement to evaluate whether it complied with section 100.371, Florida Statutes (2006). In our initial decision

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Oct 8, 2007 | Docket: 3255522

Published

countywide uniform land regulation? 3. Whether section 100.371, Florida Statutes, is applicable to amendments

Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General re Referenda Required for Adoption

963 So. 2d 210, 32 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 482, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 1225, 2007 WL 2002593

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 2007 | Docket: 64851846

Published

majority then looks to the “general law,” section 100.371, Florida Statutes, which clearly contemplates

Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General re Funding of Embryonic Stem Cell Research

959 So. 2d 195, 32 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 285, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 960, 2007 WL 1556733

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 31, 2007 | Docket: 64851239

Published

Everglades, 636 So.2d at 1340. We also note that section 100.371(5), Florida Statutes (2006), now requires the

Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General re Prohibiting State Spending for Experimentation that Involves the Destruction of a Live Human Embryo

959 So. 2d 210, 32 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 288, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 956, 2007 WL 1556636

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 31, 2007 | Docket: 64851243

Published

proposed by the initiative pursuant to section 3. Section 100.371(5), Florida Statutes (2006), now addresses

Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General re: Independent Nonpartisan Commission to Apportion Legislative & Congressional Districts Which Replaces Apportionment By Legislature

926 So. 2d 1218, 31 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 173, 2006 Fla. LEXIS 484

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 2006 | Docket: 64844178

Published

complies with the statutory requirements of section 100.371(6), Florida Statutes (2005).7 In response to

Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General re: Protect People, Especially Youth, From Addiction, Disease, & Other Health Hazards of Using Tobacco

926 So. 2d 1186, 31 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 166, 2006 Fla. LEXIS 443, 2006 WL 644872

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 2006 | Docket: 64844177

Published

proposed by initiative pursuant to section 3.” Section 100.371(6), Florida Statutes (2005), sets out the procedure

Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General Re Referenda Required for Adoption & Amendment of Local Government Comprehensive Land Use Plans

902 So. 2d 763, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 164, 2005 Fla. LEXIS 491, 2005 WL 610430

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 2005 | Docket: 64838462

Published

the Financial Impact Statement complies with section 100.371(6), Florida Statutes (2004). The sponsor of

Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General re Authorizes Miami-Dade & Broward County Voters to Approve Slot Machines in Parimutuel Facilities

882 So. 2d 966, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 419, 2004 Fla. LEXIS 1207, 2004 WL 1790706

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 11, 2004 | Docket: 64832847

Published

Parimutuel Facilities,” is in accordance *967with section 100.371, Florida Statutes. The Court finds no basis

Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General re Repeal of High Speed Rail Amendment

880 So. 2d 628, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 420, 2004 Fla. LEXIS 1159, 2004 WL 1730141

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 3, 2004 | Docket: 64832259

Published

Estimating Conference is in accordance with section 100.371(6), Florida Statutes. This scope of review

Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General re Public Protection from Repeated Medical Malpractice

880 So. 2d 686, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 417, 2004 Fla. LEXIS 1007, 2004 WL 1575059

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 2004 | Docket: 64832264

Published

Estimating Conference is in accordance with section 100.371(6), Florida Statutes (2004). This scope of

Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General re Authorizes Miami-Dade & Broward County Voters to Approve Slot Machines in Parimutuel Facilities

880 So. 2d 689, 2004 Fla. LEXIS 1009, 2004 WL 1575061

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 2004 | Docket: 64832265

Published

Parimutuel Facilities,” is in accordance with section 100.371, Florida Statutes. The financial impact statement

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Mar 31, 1998 | Docket: 3258209

Published

initiative petition remain valid. For example, section 100.371(2), Florida Statutes, governing petitions to

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Mar 31, 1998 | Docket: 3258209

Published

initiative petition remain valid. For example, section 100.371(2), Florida Statutes, governing petitions to

Eight is Enough in Pinellas v. Ruggles

678 So. 2d 898, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8906, 1996 WL 476129

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 1996 | Docket: 64766908

Published

of signatures on such petitions to four years. § 100.371(2), Fla. Stat. (1995). *900Second, section 6.02

Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General Re Tax Limitation

673 So. 2d 864, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 199, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 773, 1996 WL 233149

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 9, 1996 | Docket: 64764705

Published

require judicial determination:4 (1) whether section 100.371(2) authorizes the resubmission of a petition

Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General re Florida Locally Approved Gaming

656 So. 2d 1259, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 262, 1995 Fla. LEXIS 952, 1995 WL 337976

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 8, 1995 | Docket: 64757470

Published

collected were valid for four years pursuant to section 100.371(2), Florida Statutes (1993), and that, should

Fulani v. Krivanek

973 F.2d 1539, 1992 WL 227436

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 5, 1992 | Docket: 66276035

Published

place initiatives on the ballot. See Fla.Stat. § 100.371. . As Fulani points out, however, this saving