Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
Total Results: 14
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2023-03-15T00:53:00-07:00
Snippet: Superior Court of California, Solano City, 480 U.S. 102, 112 (1987). Asahi involved an attempt by a California
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-07-25T00:53:00-07:00
Snippet: Superior Court of California, Solano County, 480 U.S. 102, 112, 107 S. Ct. 1026, 94 L. Ed. 2d 92 (1987), the
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-07-25T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 251 So. 3d 935
Snippet: Superior Court of California, Solano County, 480 U.S. 102, 112, 107 S. Ct. 1026, 94 L. Ed. 2d 92 (1987), the
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-02-13T23:53:00-08:00
Snippet: Superior Court of California, Solano Cty., 480 U.S. 102, 112 (1987) (O’Connor, J.). Maintenance of the suit
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2010-02-11T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 28 So. 3d 880, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 101, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 218, 2010 WL 455276
Snippet: must certify the election results. §§ 102.071, 102.112, 102.151, Fla. Stat. (2006). In contrast, the SAFE…the eleventh day following a general election. § 102.112(2), Fla. Stat. (2006). If the returns are not received…time shall be certified by the department.” Id. § 102.112(8). The SAFE amendment provides that no election
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2007-10-31T00:53:00-07:00
Citation: 968 So. 2d 637
Snippet: eleventh day following a general election.[13]See §§ 102.112(2), .141(6). Under the SAFE amendment, no election…eleventh day after the general election). See § 102.112(2); see also Division of Elections *653 Advisory…frame to twelve days after a general election. § 102.112(2), Fla. Stat. (2007). [14] Even the trial court
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2000-12-10T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 772 So. 2d 1273
Snippet: seven-day deadline set forth in sections 102.111 and 102.112, Florida Statutes (2000), the Board sought an advisory…seven-day deadline set forth in sections 102.111 and 102.112?[7] III. THE APPLICABLE LAW A fundamental principle…seven-day deadline set forth in sections 102.111 and 102.112 under the circumstances presented. VI. AMENDED…returns to the Department under sections 102.111 and 102.112 is in conflict with the time frame for conducting…] Second, the language in sections 102.111 and 102.112, authorizing the Secretary to ignore amended or
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2000-12-07T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 772 So. 2d 1243
Snippet: the incongruities, the time limits of sections 102.112, 102.166, and 102.168 and 3 U.S.C. §§ 1, 5, and…certification process of Section 102.111 and Section 102.112 for the contested election process of Section 102.168
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2000-11-20T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 772 So. 2d 1220
Snippet: the deadline set forth in sections 102.111 and 102.112. The Division of Elections *1226 responded by issuing…day deadline set forth in sections 102.111 and 102.112?[10] IV. LEGAL OPINION OF THE DIVISION OF ELECTIONS…seven-day deadline set forth in sections 102.111 and 102.112 under the circumstances presented. V. THE APPLICABLE…submitting county returns under sections 102.111 and 102.112. Second, the mandatory language in section 102.111….111 conflicts with the permissive language in 102.112. A. The Recount Conflict Section 102.166(1) states
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1997-03-04T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 690 So. 2d 1325
Snippet: no right or authority. Brown v. Solary, 37 Fla. 102, 112, 19 So. 161, 164 (1896); Guin v. City of Riviera
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1996-01-17T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 673 So. 2d 3
Snippet: (Fla.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 834, 111 S.Ct. 102, 112 L.Ed.2d 73 (1990). [7] I fail to see how jury
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1995-02-21T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 651 So. 2d 719
Snippet: concurring), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 834, 111 S.Ct. 102, 112 L.Ed.2d 73 (1990); Mansfield v. State, 633 So.2d
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1994-09-09T00:53:00-07:00
Citation: 641 So. 2d 970
Snippet: (Fla.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 834, 111 S.Ct. 102, 112 L.Ed.2d 73 (1990). In this case, this alternative
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1993-05-12T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 618 So. 2d 763, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5245, 1993 WL 152401
Snippet: nom. Frazier v. Dugger, 498 U.S. 834, 111 S.Ct. 102, 112 L.Ed.2d 73 (1990). . 316.193 Driving under the