Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 104.047 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 104.047 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 104.047

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title IX
ELECTORS AND ELECTIONS
Chapter 104
ELECTION CODE: VIOLATIONS; PENALTIES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 104.047
104.047 Vote-by-mail ballots and voting; violations.—
(1) Except as provided in s. 101.62 or s. 101.655, any person who requests a vote-by-mail ballot on behalf of an elector is guilty of a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(2) Any person who marks or designates a choice on the ballot of another person, except as provided in s. 101.051, s. 101.655, or s. 101.661, is guilty of a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
History.—s. 26, ch. 98-129; s. 34, ch. 99-2; s. 57, ch. 2001-40; s. 54, ch. 2005-278; s. 36, ch. 2016-37.

F.S. 104.047 on Google Scholar

F.S. 104.047 on Casetext

Amendments to 104.047


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 104.047
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S104.047 1 - ELECTION LAWS - REPEALED 2005-278 - F: T
S104.047 1 - ELECTION LAWS - REQ VOTE BY MAIL BALLOT ON BEHALF OF ELECTOR - F: T
S104.047 2 - ELECTION LAWS - RENUMBERED. SEE REC #7254 - F: T
S104.047 2 - ELECTION LAWS - DESIGNATE CHOICE ON BALLOT OF ANOTHER - F: T
S104.047 3 - ELECTION LAWS - RENUMBERED. SEE REC #7255 - F: T
S104.047 3 - ELECTION LAWS - REPEALED CH 2001-40 - M: F
S104.047 5 - ELECTION LAWS - REPEALED CH 2001-40 - M: F

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 104.047

Total Results: 5

Braxton v. Holmes County Election Canvassing Board

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2004-02-24T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 870 So. 2d 958, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1962, 2004 WL 329336

Snippet: person witnessing the ballot is in violation of s. 104.047(3). If the canvassing board determines that any

SUNDALE ASSOC. v. Southeast Bank

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1985-05-28T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 471 So. 2d 100

Snippet: Spring v. Ronel Refining, Inc., 421 So.2d 46, *104 47 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Padgett v. First Federal Savings

Hunt v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1976-01-13T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 327 So. 2d 193

Snippet: , 36 So. 436 (1904); Telfair v. State, 56 Fla. 104, 47 So. 863 (1908). These cases, despite their age,

Merrill v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1969-11-18T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 228 So. 2d 305, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 4945

Snippet: Fla. 1, 36 So. 436; Telfair v. State, 56 Fla. 104, 47 So. 863. The other points of error urged by the

Telfair v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1909-06-15T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 58 Fla. 110

Snippet: conviction was reversed. Telfair v. State, 56 Fla. 104, 47 South Rep. 863. On this writ of error the overruling