Florida Statute 185.50 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XII
MUNICIPALITIES

Chapter 185
MUNICIPAL POLICE PENSIONS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 185.50

185.50 Retiree health insurance subsidy.—For any municipality, chapter plan, local law municipality, or local law plan under this chapter, under the broad grant of home rule powers under the State Constitution and chapter 166, municipalities have the authority to establish and administer locally funded health insurance subsidy programs. Pursuant thereto:

(1) PURPOSE.—The purpose of this section is to allow municipalities the option to use premium tax moneys, as provided for under this chapter, to establish and administer health insurance subsidy programs which will provide a monthly subsidy payment to retired members of any municipal police officers’ pension trust fund system or plan as provided under this chapter, or to beneficiaries who are spouses or financial dependents entitled to receive benefits under such a plan, in order to assist such retired members or beneficiaries in paying the costs of health insurance.

(2) MUNICIPAL RETIREE HEALTH INSURANCE SUBSIDY TRUST FUNDS; ESTABLISHMENT AND TERMINATION.—

(a) Any municipality having a municipal police officers’ pension trust fund system or plan as provided under this chapter may, in its discretion, establish by ordinance a trust fund to be known as the Municipal Police Officers’ Retiree Health Insurance Subsidy Trust Fund. This fund may be a separate account established for such purpose in the existing municipal police officers’ pension fund, provided that all funds deposited in such account are segregated from, and not commingled with, pension funds or other public moneys and that the account otherwise conforms to the requirements of subsection (8). The trust fund shall be used to account for all moneys received and disbursed pursuant to this section.

(b) Prior to the second reading of the ordinance before the municipal legislative body, an actuarial valuation must be performed by an enrolled actuary as defined in s. 185.02, and copies of the valuation and the proposed implementing ordinance shall be furnished to the division.

(c) The subsidy program may, at the discretion of the municipal governing body, be permanently discontinued by municipal ordinance at any time, subject to the requirements of any applicable collective bargaining agreement, in the same manner and subject to the same conditions established for plan termination and fund distribution under s. 185.37.

(3) FUNDING.—Trust funds established pursuant to this section shall be funded in the following manner:

(a) By payment to the fund of an amount equivalent to one-half of the net increase over the previous tax year in the premium tax funds provided for in this chapter, said amount to be established in the implementing ordinance.

(b) By no less than one-half of 1 percent of the base salary of each police officer, for so long as the police officer is employed and covered by a pension plan established pursuant to this chapter. The municipality, with approval of the board of trustees, may increase member contributions if needed to fund benefits greater than the minimums established in this section.

(c) By payment by the municipality, on at least a quarterly basis, of whatever sum is determined necessary to maintain the actuarial soundness of the fund in accordance with s. 112.64.

Such contributions and payments shall be submitted to the board of trustees of the police officers’ pension trust fund, or the plan trustees in the case of local law plans established under s. 185.35, and deposited in the Municipal Police Officers’ Retiree Health Insurance Subsidy Trust Fund, in the same manner and subject to the same time constraints as provided under s. 185.11.

(4) ELIGIBILITY FOR RETIREE HEALTH INSURANCE SUBSIDY.—A person who has contributed to the Retiree Health Insurance Subsidy Trust Fund and retires under a municipal police officers’ pension trust fund system or plan as provided under this chapter, including any local law plan as provided under s. 185.35, or a beneficiary who is a spouse or financial dependent entitled to receive benefits under such a plan, is eligible for health insurance subsidy payments provided under this section. However, the fund, with approval of the board of trustees and the municipality, may provide coverage to retirees and beneficiaries when the retirees have not contributed to the fund as provided in subsection (3). Payment of the retiree health insurance subsidy shall be made only after coverage for health insurance for the retiree or beneficiary has been certified in writing to the board of trustees of the municipal police officers’ pension trust fund.

(5) RETIREE HEALTH INSURANCE SUBSIDY AMOUNT.—Beginning on the effective date established in the implementing ordinance, each eligible retiree, or beneficiary who is a spouse or financial dependent thereof, shall receive a monthly retiree health insurance subsidy payment equal to the aggregate number of years of service with the municipality, as defined in s. 185.02, completed at the time of retirement multiplied by an amount determined in the implementing ordinance, but no less than $3 for each year of service. Nothing herein shall be construed to restrict the plan sponsor from establishing, in the implementing ordinance, a cap of no less than 30 years upon the number of years’ service for which credit will be given toward a health insurance subsidy or a maximum monthly subsidy amount.

(6) PAYMENT OF RETIREE HEALTH INSURANCE SUBSIDY.—Beginning on the effective date established in the implementing ordinance, any monthly retiree health insurance subsidy amount due and payable under this section shall be paid to retired members, or their eligible beneficiaries, by the board of trustees of the police officers’ pension trust fund, or the plan trustees in the case of local law plans established under s. 185.35, in the same manner as provided by s. 185.06(1)(c) for drafts upon the pension fund.

(7) INVESTMENT OF THE TRUST FUND.—The trustees of the police officers’ pension trust fund, or the plan trustees in the case of local law plans established under s. 185.35, are hereby authorized to invest and reinvest the funds of the Municipal Police Officers’ Retiree Health Insurance Subsidy Trust Fund in the same manner and subject to the same conditions as apply hereunder to the investment of municipal police officers’ pension funds under s. 185.06.

(8) DEPOSIT OF PENSION FUNDS.—All funds of the health insurance subsidy fund may be deposited by the board of trustees with the treasurer of the municipality, acting in a ministerial capacity only, who shall be liable in the same manner and to the same extent as he or she is liable for the safekeeping of funds for the municipality. Any funds so deposited shall be segregated by said treasurer in a separate fund, clearly identified as funds of the health insurance subsidy fund. In lieu thereof, the board of trustees shall deposit the funds of the health insurance subsidy fund in a qualified public depository as defined in s. 280.02, which shall conform to and be bound by the provisions of chapter 280 with regard to such funds. In no case shall the funds of the health insurance subsidy fund be deposited in any financial institution, brokerage house trust company, or other entity that is not a public depository as provided by s. 280.02.

(9) SEPARATION FROM SERVICE; REFUNDS.—Any police officer who terminates employment with a municipality having a Municipal Retiree Health Insurance Subsidy Trust Fund system or plan as provided under this section shall be entitled to a refund of all employee contributions he or she made to that trust fund, without interest, regardless of whether he or she has vested for purposes of retirement. Any police officer who has vested for purposes of retirement in the service of the municipality, and has contributed to the Municipal Police Officers’ Retiree Health Insurance Subsidy Trust Fund for so long as he or she was eligible to make such contributions, may, in his or her discretion, elect to leave his or her accrued contributions in the fund, whereupon, such police officer shall, upon retiring and commencing to draw retirement benefits, receive a health insurance subsidy based upon his or her aggregate number of years of service with the municipality, as defined in s. 185.02.

(10) ADMINISTRATION OF SYSTEM; ACTUARIAL VALUATIONS; AUDITS; RULES; ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS.—The board of trustees of the police officers’ pension trust fund, or the plan trustees in the case of local law plans established under s. 185.35, shall be solely responsible for administering the health insurance subsidy trust fund. Pursuant thereto:

(a) As part of its administrative duties, no less frequently than every 3 years, the board shall have an actuarial valuation of the Municipal Police Officers’ Retiree Health Insurance Subsidy Trust Fund prepared as provided in s. 112.63 by an enrolled actuary, covering the same reporting period or plan year used for the municipal police officers’ pension plan, and shall submit a report of the valuation, including actuarial assumptions and type and basis of funding, to the division.

(b) By February 1 of each year, the trustees shall file a report with the division, containing an independent audit by a certified public accountant if the fund has $250,000 or more in assets, or a certified statement of accounting if the fund has less than $250,000 in assets, for the most recent plan year, showing a detailed listing of assets and methods used to value them and a statement of all income and disbursements during the year. Such income and disbursements shall be reconciled with the assets at the beginning of and end of the year.

(c) The trustees may adopt such rules and regulations as are necessary for the effective and efficient administration of this section.

(d) At the discretion of the plan sponsor, the cost of administration may be appropriated from the trust fund or paid directly by the plan sponsor.

(11) BENEFITS.—Subsidy payments shall be payable under the municipal police officers’ retiree health insurance subsidy program only to participants in the program or their beneficiaries. Such subsidy payments shall not be subject to assignment, execution, or attachment or to any legal process whatsoever, and shall be in addition to any other benefits to which eligible recipients are entitled under any workers’ compensation law, pension law, collective bargaining agreement, municipal or county ordinance, or any other state or federal statute.

(12) DISTRIBUTION OF PREMIUM TAXES; COMPLIANCE REQUIRED.—Premium tax dollars for which spending authority is granted under this section shall be distributed from the Police and Firefighters’ Premium Tax Trust Fund and remitted annually to municipalities in the same manner as provided under this chapter for police officers’ pension funds. Once a health insurance subsidy plan has been implemented by a municipality under this section, in order for the municipality to participate in the distribution of premium tax dollars authorized under this section, all provisions of this section, including state acceptance pursuant to part VII of chapter 112, shall be complied with, and said premium tax dollars may be withheld for noncompliance.

History.—s. 2, ch. 92-51; s. 49, ch. 93-193; s. 14, ch. 94-259; s. 1460, ch. 95-147; s. 8, ch. 95-250; s. 80, ch. 99-1; s. 89, ch. 2024-140.

F.S. 185.50 on Google Scholar

F.S. 185.50 on Casetext

Amendments to 185.50

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 185.50

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 185.50.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 185.50

Total Results: 18

ROY LEE ICON v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-06-09

Snippet: investigative cost, a $1,500.00 public defender fee and a $185.50 public defender transcript fee, among others. When

Banks v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1997-12-31

Citation: 702 So. 2d 1381, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14494, 1997 WL 795066

Snippet: 18 (Fla.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 871, 97 S.Ct. 185, 50 L.Ed.2d 151 (1976); Hoyt v. State, 119 So.2d 691

Williams v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1994-10-19

Citation: 644 So. 2d 330, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10013, 1994 WL 567748

Snippet: 21 (Fla.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 871, 97 S.Ct. 185, 50 L.Ed.2d 151 (1976). Furthermore, claims of ineffective

Douglas v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-01-15

Citation: 575 So. 2d 165, 1991 WL 6545

Snippet: 18 (Fla.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 871, 97 S.Ct. 185, 50 L.Ed.2d 151 (1976). We affirmed the denial of Douglas'

Pritchett v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-07-20

Citation: 566 So. 2d 6, 1990 WL 100743

Snippet: 18 (Fla.) cert. denied, 429 U.S. 871, 97 S.Ct. 185, 50 L.Ed.2d 151 (1976). However, we agree that the

Craig v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1987-05-28

Citation: 510 So. 2d 857, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 269

Snippet: 18 (Fla.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 871, 97 S.Ct. 185, 50 L.Ed.2d 151 (1976). We have found the Tedder standard

Amazon v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1986-03-13

Citation: 487 So. 2d 8, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 105

Snippet: 18 (Fla.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 871, 97 S.Ct. 185, 50 L.Ed.2d 151 (1976). My review of the record convinces

Brown v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-06-27

Citation: 473 So. 2d 1260, 67 A.L.R. 4th 917

Snippet: 18 (Fla.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 871, 97 S.Ct. 185, 50 L.Ed.2d 151 (1976). Upon our review of the evidence

Thomas v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-09-13

Citation: 456 So. 2d 454

Snippet: 18 (Fla.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 871, 97 S.Ct. 185, 50 L.Ed.2d 151 (1976). Where there are one or more

Bassett v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-03-08

Citation: 449 So. 2d 803

Snippet: 18 (Fla.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 871, 97 S.Ct. 185, 50 L.Ed.2d 151 (1976). Sentencing Phase In imposing

Herzog v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-09-22

Citation: 439 So. 2d 1372, 1983 Fla. LEXIS 3215

Snippet: 18 (Fla.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 871, 97 S.Ct. 185, 50 L.Ed.2d 151 (1976), Dobbert v. State, 328 So.2d

Herzog v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-09-22

Citation: 439 So. 2d 1372

Snippet: 18 (Fla.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 871, 97 S.Ct. 185, 50 L.Ed.2d 151 (1976), Dobbert v. State, 328 So.2d

Stevens v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-09-14

Citation: 419 So. 2d 1058

Snippet: 18 (Fla.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 871, 97 S.Ct. 185, 50 L.Ed.2d 151 (1976). The judgment of conviction

Walsh v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-07-29

Citation: 418 So. 2d 1000, 1982 Fla. LEXIS 2501

Snippet: 18 (Fla.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 871, 97 S.Ct. 185, 50 L.Ed.2d 151 (1976). And we have reversed the death

Walsh v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-07-29

Citation: 418 So. 2d 1000

Snippet: 18 (Fla.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 871, 97 S.Ct. 185, 50 L.Ed.2d 151 (1976). And we have reversed the death

Buford v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-07-23

Citation: 403 So. 2d 943

Snippet: 18 (Fla.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 871, 97 S.Ct. 185, 50 L.Ed.2d 151 (1976); and Sawyer v. State, 313 So

Douglas v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1979-07-20

Citation: 373 So. 2d 895

Snippet: 18 (Fla.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 871, 97 S.Ct. 185, 50 L.Ed.2d 151 (1976). Appellant's application for

McCall v. Lee

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1913-06-17

Citation: 66 Fla. 14, 62 So. 902

Snippet: dissenting-opinion in Ex Parte Beville, 58 Fla. 170, text 185, 50 South. Rep. 865, text 869, 27 L. R. A. (N. S.)