215.965
Disbursement of state moneys.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
215.965 Disbursement of state moneys.—Except as provided in s. 17.076, s. 253.025(17), s. 717.124(4)(b) and (c), s. 732.107(5), or s. 733.816(5), all moneys in the State Treasury shall be disbursed by state warrant, drawn by the Chief Financial Officer upon the State Treasury and payable to the ultimate beneficiary. This authorization shall include electronic disbursement.
History.—s. 31, ch. 69-106; s. 3, ch. 81-277; s. 6, ch. 85-61; s. 2, ch. 89-291; s. 7, ch. 89-299; s. 4, ch. 91-56; s. 12, ch. 94-240; s. 24, ch. 96-301; s. 7, ch. 99-247; s. 59, ch. 2000-371; s. 33, ch. 2001-36; s. 191, ch. 2001-226; s. 232, ch. 2003-261; s. 24, ch. 2006-1; s. 32, ch. 2016-233.
Note.—Former s. 216.331.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases, 2012–2014 · leading case: Atwater v. City of Cape Coral
Atwater v. City of Cape Coral (2013)
“See § 215.965, Fla. Stat. (2008) (“Except as provided in .”
Atwater v. Citibank, F.S.B., Inc. (2012)
“) (emphasis added); § 215.965, Fla. Stat. (2011) (“[A]ll moneys in the State Treasury shall be disbursed by state warrant, drawn by the Chief Financial Officer upon the State Treasury and payable to the ultimate beneficiary.”
Crescenzo v. Atwater (2014)
“Section 215.965, Florida Statutes (2011), generally requires that money in the state treasury be disbursed by a state warrant, drawn by the CFO, and payable to the “ultimate beneficiary.”
Atwater v. Citibank Federal Savings Bank (2012)
“) (emphasis added); § 215.965, Fla. Stat. (2011) (“[A]ll moneys in the State Treasury shall be disbursed by state warrant, drawn by the Chief Financial Officer upon the State Treasury and payable to the ultimate beneficiary.”
Atwater v. Bruneau (2012)
“) (emphasis added); § 215.965, Fla. Stat. (2011) (“[A]ll moneys in the State Treasury shall be disbursed by state warrant, drawn by the Chief Financial Officer upon the State Treasury and payable to the ultimate beneficiary.”
Atwater v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n (2012)
“) (emphasis added); § 215.965, Fla. Stat. (2011) (“[A]ll moneys in the State Treasury shall be disbursed by state warrant, drawn by the Chief Financial Officer upon the State Treasury and payable to the ultimate beneficiary.”
Atwater v. Equity One, Inc. (2012)
“) (emphasis added); § 215.965, Fla. Stat. (2011) (“[A]ll moneys in the State Treasury shall be disbursed by state warrant, drawn by the Chief Financial Officer upon the State Treasury and payable to the ultimate beneficiary.”
Atwater v. Metropolitan Mortgage Co. (2012)
“) (emphasis added); § 215.965, Fla. Stat. (2011) (“[A]ll moneys in the State Treasury shall be disbursed by state warrant, drawn by the Chief Financial Officer upon the State Treasury and payable to the ultimate beneficiary.”
Atwater v. Homeside Lending, Inc. (2012)
“s been adjudicated or is not in dispute and the money has remained so deposited for 5 years or more unclaimed by the person, firm, or corporation entitled thereto, on or before December 1 of each year the judge, or one of the judges, of the court shall direct that the money be…”
Atwater v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (2012)
“s been adjudicated or is not in dispute and the money has remained so deposited for 5 years or more unclaimed by the person, firm, or corporation entitled thereto, on or before December 1 of each year the judge, or one of the judges, of the court shall direct that the money be…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.