Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 330.41 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 330.41 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 330.41

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXV
AVIATION
Chapter 330
REGULATION OF AIRCRAFT, PILOTS, AND AIRPORTS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 330.41
330.41 Unmanned Aircraft Systems Act.
(1) SHORT TITLE.This act may be cited as the “Unmanned Aircraft Systems Act.”
(2) DEFINITIONS.As used in this act, the term:
(a) “Critical infrastructure facility” means any of the following, if completely enclosed by a fence or other physical barrier that is obviously designed to exclude intruders, or if clearly marked with a sign or signs which indicate that entry is forbidden and which are posted on the property in a manner reasonably likely to come to the attention of intruders:
1. A power generation or transmission facility, substation, switching station, or electrical control center.
2. A chemical or rubber manufacturing or storage facility.
3. A water intake structure, water treatment facility, wastewater treatment plant, or pump station.
4. A mining facility.
5. A natural gas or compressed gas compressor station, storage facility, or natural gas or compressed gas pipeline.
6. A liquid natural gas or propane gas terminal or storage facility.
7. Any portion of an aboveground oil or gas pipeline.
8. A refinery.
9. A gas processing plant, including a plant used in the processing, treatment, or fractionation of natural gas.
10. A wireless communications facility, including the tower, antennae, support structures, and all associated ground-based equipment.
11. A seaport as listed in s. 311.09(1), which need not be completely enclosed by a fence or other physical barrier and need not be marked with a sign or signs indicating that entry is forbidden.
12. An inland port or other facility or group of facilities serving as a point of intermodal transfer of freight in a specific area physically separated from a seaport.
13. An airport as defined in s. 330.27.
14. A spaceport territory as defined in s. 331.303(19).
15. A military installation as defined in 10 U.S.C. s. 2801(c)(4) and an armory as defined in s. 250.01.
16. A dam as defined in s. 373.403(1) or other structures, such as locks, floodgates, or dikes, which are designed to maintain or control the level of navigable waterways.
17. A state correctional institution as defined in s. 944.02 or a contractor-operated correctional facility authorized under chapter 957.
18. A secure detention center or facility as defined in s. 985.03, or a moderate-risk residential facility, a high-risk residential facility, or a maximum-risk residential facility as those terms are described in s. 985.03(44).
19. A county detention facility as defined in s. 951.23.
20. A critical infrastructure facility as defined in s. 692.201.
(b) “Drone” has the same meaning as s. 934.50(2).
(c) “Drone delivery service” means a person or entity engaged in a business or profession of delivering goods via drone and who is governed by Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
(d) “Drone port” means a stand-alone building that does not exceed 1,500 square feet in area or 36 feet in height; is located in a nonresidential area; is used or intended for use by a drone delivery service for the storage, launch, landing, and observation of drones; was constructed using Type I or Type II construction as described in the Florida Building Code; and, if greater than one story in height, includes at least one stairwell that is compliant with the Florida Building Code.
(e) “Unmanned aircraft system” means a drone and its associated elements, including communication links and the components used to control the drone which are required for the pilot in command to operate the drone safely and efficiently.
(3) REGULATION.
(a) The authority to regulate the operation of unmanned aircraft systems is vested in the state except as provided in federal regulations, authorizations, or exemptions.
(b) Except as otherwise expressly provided, a political subdivision may not enact or enforce an ordinance or resolution relating to the design, manufacture, testing, maintenance, licensing, registration, certification, or operation of an unmanned aircraft system, including airspace, altitude, flight paths, equipment or technology requirements; the purpose of operations; and pilot, operator, or observer qualifications, training, and certification.
(c) Except as otherwise expressly provided, a political subdivision may not withhold issuance of a business tax receipt, development permit, or other use approval to a drone delivery service or enact or enforce an ordinance or resolution that prohibits a drone delivery service’s operation based on the location of its drone port, notwithstanding part II of chapter 163 and chapter 205. A political subdivision may enforce minimum setback and landscaping regulations that are generally applicable to permitted uses in the drone port site’s zoning district. This paragraph may not be construed to authorize a political subdivision to require additional landscaping as a condition of approval of a drone port.
(d) This subsection does not limit the authority of a local government to enact or enforce local ordinances relating to nuisances, voyeurism, harassment, reckless endangerment, property damage, or other illegal acts arising from the use of unmanned aircraft systems if such laws or ordinances are not specifically related to the use of an unmanned aircraft system for those illegal acts.
(4) PROTECTION OF CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE FACILITIES.
(a) A person may not knowingly or willfully:
1. Operate a drone over a critical infrastructure facility;
2. Allow a drone to make contact with a critical infrastructure facility, including any person or object on the premises of or within the facility; or
3. Allow a drone to come within a distance of a critical infrastructure facility that is close enough to interfere with the operations of or cause a disturbance to the facility.
(b) A person who violates paragraph (a) commits a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083. A person who commits a second or subsequent violation commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
(c) This subsection does not apply to actions identified in paragraph (a) which are committed by:
1. A federal, state, or other governmental entity, or a person under contract or otherwise acting under the direction of a federal, state, or other governmental entity.
2. A law enforcement agency that is in compliance with s. 934.50, or a person under contract with or otherwise acting under the direction of such law enforcement agency.
3. An owner, operator, or occupant of the critical infrastructure facility, or a person who has prior written consent of such owner, operator, or occupant.
(d) This subsection and paragraph (2)(a) shall sunset 60 days after the date that a process pursuant to s. 2209 of the FAA Extension, Safety and Security Act of 2016 becomes effective.
(5) PROTECTION OF SCHOOLS.
(a) A person may not knowingly or willfully:
1. Operate a drone over a public or private school serving students in any grade from voluntary prekindergarten through grade 12; or
2. Allow a drone to make contact with a school, including any person or object on the premises of or within the school facility.
(b) A person who violates paragraph (a) commits a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083. A person who commits a second or subsequent violation commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
(c) A person who violates paragraph (a) and records video of the school, including any person or object on the premises of or within the school facility, commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083. A person who commits a second or subsequent violation commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(d) This subsection does not apply to actions identified in paragraph (a) which are committed by:
1. A person acting under the prior written consent of the school principal, district school board, superintendent, or school governing board.
2. A law enforcement agency that is in compliance with s. 934.50 or a person under contract with or otherwise acting under the direction of such law enforcement agency.
(6) CONSTRUCTION.This section shall be construed in accordance with standards imposed by federal statutes, regulations, and Federal Aviation Administration guidance on unmanned aircraft systems.
History.s. 8, ch. 2017-150; s. 1, ch. 2019-113; s. 2, ch. 2021-165; s. 1, ch. 2023-137; ss. 1, 2, ch. 2023-147; s. 24, ch. 2024-2; s. 7, ch. 2024-84; s. 1, ch. 2024-133; s. 2, ch. 2024-155.

F.S. 330.41 on Google Scholar

F.S. 330.41 on Casetext

Amendments to 330.41


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 330.41
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S330.41 4a1 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - OPER DRONE OVER CRITICAL INFASTRUCTRE FACILITY - M: S
S330.41 4a1 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - RENUMBERED. SEE REC # 9045 - M: F
S330.41 4a1 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - OPER DRONE OVER CRIT INFASTRUCT FACIL 2ND SUB - M: F
S330.41 4a2 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - DRONE MAKE CONTACT W CRIT INFASTRUCT FACILITY - M: S
S330.41 4a2 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - RENUMBERED. SEE REC # 9046 - M: F
S330.41 4a2 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - DRONE MAKE CONTACT CRIT INFSTRCT FACIL 2ND SUB - M: F
S330.41 4a3 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - DRONE INTERF OPERATNS DISTURB CRIT INFAS FACIL - M: S
S330.41 4a3 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - RENUMBERED. SEE REC # 9047 - M: F
S330.41 4a3 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - DRON INTERF OPER DISB CRIT INFAS FACIL 2ND SUB - M: F
S330.41 4b - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - RENUMBERED. SEE REC #8698 - M: S



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 330.41

Total Results: 11

Cassel v. Price

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-04-07

Citation: 396 So. 2d 258

Snippet: as in Stark v. Holtzclaw, 90 Fla. 207, 105 So. 330, 41 A.L.R. 1323 (1925). Cf. Johns v. Clay Electrical

Smiley v. Court

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1971-01-27

Citation: 243 So. 2d 643, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5464

Snippet: Stark v. Holtzclaw, 1925, 90 Fla. 207, 105 So. 330, 41 A.L.R. 1323; Schatz v. 7-Eleven, Inc., Fla.App

Concrete Const., Inc., of Lake Worth v. Petterson

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1968-11-13

Citation: 216 So. 2d 221

Snippet: opinions in Stark v. Holtzclaw, 90 Fla. 207, 105 So. 330, 41 A.L.R. 1323. See also Peters v. City of Tampa,

Gresham v. Courson

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1965-06-15

Citation: 177 So. 2d 33

Snippet: Stark v. Holtzclaw (1925), 90 Fla. 207, 105 So. 330, 41 *37 A.L.R. 1323, quoting with approval from Atchison

Crutchfield v. Adams

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1963-04-23

Citation: 152 So. 2d 808

Snippet: [6] Stark v. Holtzclaw, 90 Fla. 207, 105 So. 330, 41 A.L.R. 1323 (1925). [7] May v. Simmons, 104 Fla

Banks v. Mason

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1961-07-21

Citation: 132 So. 2d 219

Snippet: Stark v. Holtzclaw, 1925, 90 Fla. 207, 105 So. 330, 41 A.L.R. 1323; May v. Simmons, 1932, 104 Fla. 707

Larnel Builders, Inc. v. Martin

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1959-04-08

Citation: 110 So. 2d 649

Snippet: 339. Stark v. Holtzelaw, 90 Fla. 207, 105 So. 330, 41 A.L.R. 1323. [4] See Ansin v. Thurston, Fla.,

City of Miami v. Saunders

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1942-11-06

Citation: 10 So. 2d 326, 151 Fla. 699, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 1247

Snippet: Also Stark v. Holtzclaw, 90 Fla. 207, 105 So. 330, 41 A.L.R. 1323; Benedict Pineapple Co. v. Atlantic

Teddleton v. Florida Power Light Company

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1941-01-24

Citation: 200 So. 546, 145 Fla. 671, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 744

Snippet: See Stark v. Holtzclaw, 90 Fla. 207, 105 So. 330, 41 A. L. R. 1323. "Where contributory negligence is

Atlantic Peninsular Holding Co. v. Oenbrink

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1938-06-30

Citation: 182 So. 812, 133 Fla. 325, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 976

Snippet: See: Stark v. Holtzclaw, 90 Fla. 207, 105 So. 330, 41 A.L.R. 1323; May v. Simmons, 104 Fla. 707, 140

Peters v. City of Tampa

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1934-07-03

Citation: 155 So. 854, 115 Fla. 666, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1663

Snippet: Stark v. Holtzclaw,90 Fla. 207, 105 Sou. Rep. 330, 41 A. L. R. 1323, and that the court below erroneously