Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 440.151 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 440.151 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 440.151

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXI
LABOR
Chapter 440
WORKERS' COMPENSATION
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 440.151
440.151 Occupational diseases.
(1)(a) Where the employer and employee are subject to the provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Law, the disablement or death of an employee resulting from an occupational disease as hereinafter defined shall be treated as the happening of an injury by accident, notwithstanding any other provisions of this chapter, and the employee or, in case of death, the employee’s dependents shall be entitled to compensation as provided by this chapter, except as hereinafter otherwise provided; and the practice and procedure prescribed by this chapter shall apply to all proceedings under this section, except as hereinafter otherwise provided. Provided, however, that in no case shall an employer be liable for compensation under the provisions of this section unless such disease has resulted from the nature of the employment in which the employee was engaged under such employer, was actually contracted while so engaged, and the nature of the employment was the major contributing cause of the disease. Major contributing cause must be shown by medical evidence only, as demonstrated by physical examination findings and diagnostic testing. “Nature of the employment” means that in the occupation in which the employee was so engaged there is attached a particular hazard of such disease that distinguishes it from the usual run of occupations, or the incidence of such disease is substantially higher in the occupation in which the employee was so engaged than in the usual run of occupations. In claims for death under s. 440.16, death must occur within 350 weeks after last exposure. Both causation and sufficient exposure to a specific harmful substance shown to be present in the workplace to support causation shall be proven by clear and convincing evidence.
(b) No compensation shall be payable for an occupational disease if the employee, at the time of entering into the employment of the employer by whom the compensation would otherwise be payable, falsely represents herself or himself in writing as not having previously been disabled, laid off or compensated in damages or otherwise, because of such disease.
(c) Where an occupational disease is aggravated by any other disease or infirmity, not itself compensable, or where disability or death from any other cause, not itself compensable, is aggravated, prolonged, accelerated or in anywise contributed to by an occupational disease, the compensation shall be payable only if the occupational disease is the major contributing cause of the injury. Any compensation shall be reduced and limited to such proportion only of the compensation that would be payable if the occupational disease were the sole cause of the disability or death as such occupational disease, as a causative factor, bears to all the causes of such disability or death, such reduction in compensation to be effected by reducing the number of weekly or monthly payments or the amounts of such payments, as under the circumstances of the particular case may be for the best interest of the claimant or claimants. Major contributing cause must be demonstrated by medical evidence based on physical examination findings and diagnostic testing.
(d) No compensation for death from an occupational disease shall be payable to any person whose relationship to the deceased, which under the provisions of this Workers’ Compensation Law would give right to compensation, arose subsequent to the beginning of the first compensable disability, save only to afterborn children of a marriage existing at the beginning of such disability.
(e) No compensation shall be payable for disability or death resulting from tuberculosis arising out of and in the course of employment by the Department of Health at a state tuberculosis hospital, or aggravated by such employment, when the employee had suffered from said disease at any time prior to the commencement of such employment.
(2) Whenever used in this section the term “occupational disease” shall be construed to mean only a disease which is due to causes and conditions which are characteristic of and peculiar to a particular trade, occupation, process, or employment, and to exclude all ordinary diseases of life to which the general public is exposed, unless the incidence of the disease is substantially higher in the particular trade, occupation, process, or employment than for the general public. “Occupational disease” means only a disease for which there are epidemiological studies showing that exposure to the specific substance involved, at the levels to which the employee was exposed, may cause the precise disease sustained by the employee.
(3) Except as otherwise provided in this section, “disablement” means disability as described in s. 440.02(15).
(4) This section shall not apply to cases of occupational disease in which the last injurious exposure to the hazards of such disease occurred before this section shall have taken effect.
(5) Where compensation is payable for an occupational disease, the employer in whose employment the employee was last injuriously exposed to the hazards of such disease, and the insurance carrier, if any, on the risk when such employee was last so exposed under such employer, shall alone be liable therefor, without right to contribution from any prior employer or insurance carrier; and the notice of injury and claim for compensation, as hereinafter required, shall be given and made to such employer; provided, however, that in case of disability from any dust disease the only employer and insurance carrier liable shall be the last employer in whose employment the employee was last injuriously exposed to the hazards of the disease for a period of at least 60 days.
(6) The time for notice of injury or death provided in s. 440.185(1) shall be extended in cases of occupational diseases to a period of 90 days.
History.s. 1, ch. 22852, 1945; s. 1, ch. 23921, 1947; s. 11, ch. 25035, 1949; s. 3, ch. 28241, 1953; s. 1, ch. 65-116; ss. 19, 35, ch. 69-106; ss. 10, 24, ch. 74-197; s. 23, ch. 78-300; ss. 11, 124, ch. 79-40; s. 21, ch. 79-312; s. 43, ch. 89-289; s. 56, ch. 90-201; s. 52, ch. 91-1; s. 111, ch. 97-103; s. 53, ch. 99-5; s. 210, ch. 99-8; s. 19, ch. 2003-412; s. 97, ch. 2023-8.

F.S. 440.151 on Google Scholar

F.S. 440.151 on Casetext

Amendments to 440.151


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 440.151
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 440.151.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 440.151

Total Results: 20

Seminole County, Florida and Johns Eastern Company, Inc. v. Braden

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2023-12-13T00:00:00-08:00

Snippet: compensability of his condition. See §§ 440.02(1), 440.09, 440.151, Fla. Stat. 3 Yet Braden did not assert the… or hindrance to recovery, for example. See §§ 440.151, 440.09(1)(b), Fla. Stat.; Gallagher Bassett Services… disease in the manner contemplated by section 440.151, Florida Statutes. Id. This Court reversed the … proof meeting the requirements of section 440.151, Florida Statutes (2009), (titled “Occupational…occupational diseases” as provided for in section 440.151, Florida Statutes (2009). Mr. Walters sought

City of Jacksonville v. Ratliff

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2017-04-13T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 217 So. 3d 183, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5201

Snippet: action pursuant to section 440.151, Florida Statutes. Under section 440.151, a claimant was under the …statute, an occupational disease claim under section 440.151 enjoyed no presumption in favor of the claimant…to rebut its presumption.6 Of interest, section 440.151 specifically excluded the presumption of section…further proof meeting the requirements of section 440.151, Florida Statutes, as it relates to a “trigger.…, thus, governed by legal standards of section 440.151, Florida Statutes; e.g. statute of limitations.

Scherer v. Volusia County Department of Corrections

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-07-07T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 171 So. 3d 135

Snippet: happening of an injury by accident. ...’ Section 440.151(1), Florida Statutes (1969).” Hoppe v. City of

Leon Smith v. City of Daytona Beach Police Dept./City of etc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-07-30T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 143 So. 3d 436, 2014 WL 3466907

Snippet: disease results in disability. See § 440.151(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2012) (“[T]he disablement or

Walters v. State-DOC/Division of Risk Management

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-10-16T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 100 So. 3d 1173, 2012 WL 4872654, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 17887

Snippet: disease in the manner contemplated by section 440.151, Florida Statutes (2009). In his single point on…put on proof meeting the requirements of section 440.151, Florida Statutes (2009), (titled “Occupational…occupational diseases” as provided for in section 440.151, Florida Statutes (2009). Mr. Walters sought to

Rocha v. City of Tampa

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-10-10T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 100 So. 3d 138, 2012 WL 4800990, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 17309

Snippet: .” § 440.02(13), Fla. Stat. (2009); see also § 440.151(3) (defining “disablement,” for purposes of determining

City of Pembroke Pines v. Ortagus

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2010-11-02T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 50 So. 3d 31, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 16608, 2010 WL 4292823

Snippet: major contributing cause of the disease." § 440.151(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2004). The occupational disease…compensability is established, nothing in section 440.151, or elsewhere in chapter 440, conditions the receipt…if it were "an injury by accident." § 440.151(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2004). As the JCC in this case

Fuller v. Okaloosa Correctional Institution

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2009-11-24T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 22 So. 3d 803, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 17537, 2009 WL 4030845

Snippet: occupational causation by medical evidence. See § 440.151(1), Fla. Stat. (2007) (requiring claimant to prove

Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance v. Polk County

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2009-08-14T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 20 So. 3d 383, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 11324

Snippet: section 440.151. Id. at 112-13. It explained: Occupational diseases are governed by section 440.151, Florida…because it did not apply the provisions of section 440.151(5), Florida Statutes (1999),[1] that clearly make…industry. The relevant Florida statute, section 440.151, entitled "Occupational Diseases," is… on appeal, the critical subsection of section 440.151 is subsection (5). It provides: Where compensation…liable to pay the claim. III. Applying Section 440.151(5) to Determine the Insurer Responsible for the

Orange County Fire Rescue v. Jones

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2007-06-21T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 959 So. 2d 785

Snippet: of disablement from the disease. Id. (citing § 440.151(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1991) and (1997)) (other citations… to the hazards of such disease. . . ." § 440.151(3), Fla. Stat. (1997).[3]See also Sledge, 497 So… dissenting. The issue here is whether section 440.151, Florida Statutes (1991), may be read as contemplating… late 1992 and early 1993. Pursuant to section 440.151, claimant became disabled in late 1992, when he…exposed to the hazards of [the] disease." See § 440.151(3), Fla. Stat. (1991); City of Port Orange v. Sedacca

City of Port Orange v. Sedacca

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2007-04-10T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 953 So. 2d 727

Snippet: hereinafter defined." § 440.151, Fla. Stat. Since section 440.151 defines disablement, this statutory…as an occupational disease pursuant to section 440.151, Florida Statutes. Coverage Under the Workers&…the occupational disease provisions of section 440.151, Florida Statutes, that Claimant seeks coverage…other statutory requirements. In reviewing section 440.151, and the applicable case law interpreting the statute…significant. One, we do not look beyond section 440.151 to define its relevant terms. See Watkins Eng'

Flamily v. City of Orlando

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2006-02-22T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 924 So. 2d 78

Snippet: Corp., 398 So.2d 902, 904 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); § 440.151(2), Fla. Stat. (2000). Here, the record supports

Seminole County Government v. Bartlett

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2006-01-30T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 933 So. 2d 550

Snippet: is an occupational disease pursuant to section 440.151(2), Florida Statutes. The statutory criteria to…So.2d 902, 904 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); see also § 440.151(2), Fla. Stat. (2002). Claimant failed to present

POLK COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS v. Ross

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2005-09-22T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 911 So. 2d 854

Snippet: the initial manifestation of an injury. Section 440.151(6) extends the period of time to report an occupational

City of Mary Esther v. McArtor

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2005-06-07T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 902 So. 2d 942

Snippet: 1231, 1233 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). Under section 440.151(5), Florida Statutes, the carrier on risk at the

City of Cooper City v. Farthing

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2005-05-27T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 905 So. 2d 925

Snippet: an occupational disease, as defined in section 440.151, Florida Statutes (2000), which requires a claimant…provisions applicable to such diseases under section 440.151.[3] If so, his construction was incorrect. No issue…afflicted met the standards required by section 440.151. Farthing alternatively argues that even if he …the major contributing cause of the disease. § 440.151(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2003). [3] Among other things

James v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2003-12-30T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 864 So. 2d 1132

Snippet: cases of occupational disease as defined in FS 440.151, the AWW is properly calculated using the "…this conclusion is found in the language of FS 440.151, as explained in Cote. The convergence of the analysis…statutorily defined as the date of injury. See § 440.151(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2002). And see Cote v. Combustion

Florida Power Corp. v. Brown

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2003-11-20T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 863 So. 2d 364

Snippet: resulting from an occupational disease. See § 440.151(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2000). It is well settled that

Michels v. Orange County Fire/Rescue

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2002-04-22T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 819 So. 2d 158

Snippet: was exposed to the hazards of the disease. See § 440.151(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1991) and (1997) ("disablement

Michels v. Orange County Fire/Rescue

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2002-01-18T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 804 So. 2d 557, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 271, 2002 WL 63334

Snippet: was exposed to the hazards of the disease. See § 440.151(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (1991) and (1997) (“disablement