Florida Statute 507.11 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS

Chapter 507
HOUSEHOLD MOVING SERVICES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 507.11

507.11 Criminal penalties.—

(1) The refusal of a mover or a mover’s employee, agent, or contractor to comply with an order from a law enforcement officer to relinquish a shipper’s household goods after the officer determines that the shipper has tendered payment of the amount of a written estimate or contract, and, if applicable, amendments to the contract for services reflecting the price adjustment signed by the shipper or after the officer determines that the mover did not produce a signed or electronically acknowledged binding estimate or contract for service and, if applicable, amendments to the contract for services reflecting the price adjustment signed by the shipper upon which demand is being made for payment, is a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. A mover’s compliance with an order from a law enforcement officer to relinquish goods to a shipper is not a waiver or finding of fact regarding any right to seek further payment from the shipper.

(2) Except as provided in subsection (1), any person or business that violates this chapter commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.

History.—s. 11, ch. 2002-53; s. 13, ch. 2006-4; s. 10, ch. 2024-47.

F.S. 507.11 on Google Scholar

F.S. 507.11 on Casetext

Amendments to 507.11

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 507.11

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S507.11 1 - RESIST OFFICER - MOVER REFUSE LEO ORDER RELEASE GOODS - F: T

S507.11 2 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - MOVER OR BROKER VIOL MOVING REGS - M: F

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 507.11

Total Results: 5

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2010-02-16

Snippet: "Florida Communities Trust Act." 5 Section 380.507(11), Fla. Stat. 6 Section 125.355(1)(b), Fla. Stat

Seaboard Coast Line Railroad v. Hunt

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1974-08-06

Citation: 299 So. 2d 84, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8779

Snippet: also approved in Railway Co. v. Artery, 137 U.S. 507, 11 S.Ct. 129 [,34 L.Ed. 747], It is insisted, however

Boston Insurance Company v. Smith

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1963-01-29

Citation: 149 So. 2d 68

Snippet: Merchants Mutual Casualty Co. v. Lambert, 90 N.H. 507, 11 A.2d 361, 127 A.L.R. 483 (1940), is also relied

Hamburg v. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1900-01-15

Citation: 42 Fla. 86

Snippet: 12 S. E. Rep. 655; Louvall v. Gridley, 70 Cal. 507, 11 Pac. Rep. 777. This amendment was filed by the

Schultz v. Pacific Insurance

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1872-01-15

Citation: 14 Fla. 73

Snippet: *107Court of King’s Bench. 3 Pet., 222; 10 Pet., 507; 11 Pet., 213; 3 Sum., 276; 5 Barn. 3 Ala., 171. The