Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 542.32 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 542.32 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 542.32

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS
Chapter 542
COMBINATIONS RESTRICTING TRADE OR COMMERCE
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 542.32
542.32 Rule of construction and coverage.—It is the intent of the Legislature that, in construing this chapter, due consideration and great weight be given to the interpretations of the federal courts relating to comparable federal antitrust statutes. In particular, the failure to include in this chapter the substantive provisions of s. 3 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. s. 14, shall not be deemed in any way to limit the scope of s. 542.18 or s. 542.19.
History.—s. 1, ch. 80-28.

F.S. 542.32 on Google Scholar

F.S. 542.32 on Casetext

Amendments to 542.32


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 542.32
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 542.32.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 542.32

Total Results: 8

MYD Marine Distributor, Inc. v. International Paint Ltd.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-12-14

Citation: 76 So. 3d 42, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 19927, 2011 WL 6183519

Snippet: to comparable federal antitrust statutes.” See § 542.32, Fla. Stat. (2005). Therefore, we “look to federal

Okeelanta Power Ltd. Partnership v. Florida Power & Light Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-02-16

Citation: 766 So. 2d 264, 2000 WL 173091

Snippet: relating to comparable federal antitrust statutes." § 542.32, Fla. Stat. (1997). [6] The parties disagree regarding

MacK v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-05-07

Citation: 673 So. 2d 100, 1996 WL 225715

Snippet: relating to comparable federal antitrust statutes." § 542.32, Fla. Stat. (1993).... The United States Supreme

Parts Depot Co. v. Florida Auto Supply

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-03-13

Citation: 669 So. 2d 321

Snippet: antitrust statutes in construing this statute. § 542.32, Fla.Stat. (1989). Therefore, we look to federal

DeMoya v. Mosely

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-05-31

Citation: 525 So. 2d 1012, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2231, 1988 WL 54218

Snippet: Inc., 497 F.Supp. 513 (M.D. Fla.1980); Section 542.32, Florida Statutes (1980 Supp.).

American Credit Card Tel. Co. v. NAT. PAY TEL. CORP.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1987-03-20

Citation: 504 So. 2d 486

Snippet: and NIMMONS, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] By section 542.32, the legislature has directed that in construing

St. Petersburg Yacht Charters v. Morgan Yacht

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-05-04

Citation: 457 So. 2d 1028

Snippet: part of trade or commerce in this state. Section 542.32, Florida Statutes (1981), provides: Rule of construction

Sabates v. International Med. Centers, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-04-03

Citation: 450 So. 2d 514

Snippet: weight" in construing this state's antitrust law. § 542.32, Fla. Stat. (1981). See § 542.16, Fla. Stat. (1981)