Florida Statute 626.631 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXVII
INSURANCE

Chapter 626
INSURANCE FIELD REPRESENTATIVES AND OPERATIONS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 626.631

626.631 Procedure for refusal, suspension, or revocation of license.—

(1) If any licensee is convicted by a court of a violation of this code or a felony, the licenses and appointments of such person shall be immediately revoked by the department. The licensee may subsequently request a hearing pursuant to ss. 120.569 and 120.57, and the department shall expedite any such requested hearing. The sole issue at such hearing shall be whether the revocation should be rescinded because such person was not in fact convicted of a violation of this code or a felony.

(2) The papers, documents, reports, or evidence of the department relative to a hearing for revocation or suspension of a license or appointment pursuant to the provisions of this chapter and chapter 120 are confidential and exempt from the provisions of s. 119.07(1) until after the same have been published at the hearing. However, such papers, documents, reports, or items of evidence are subject to discovery in a hearing for revocation or suspension of a license or appointment.

History.—s. 242, ch. 59-205; ss. 13, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 14, ch. 71-86; s. 3, ch. 76-168; s. 1, ch. 77-457; s. 21, ch. 78-95; s. 3, ch. 81-282; ss. 2, 3, ch. 81-318; ss. 208, 217, 807, 810, ch. 82-243; ss. 58, 206, 207, ch. 90-363; s. 4, ch. 91-429; s. 16, ch. 92-146; s. 5, ch. 93-80; s. 373, ch. 96-406; s. 269, ch. 96-410; s. 949, ch. 2003-261; s. 47, ch. 2004-390.

F.S. 626.631 on Google Scholar

F.S. 626.631 on Casetext

Amendments to 626.631

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 626.631

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 626.631.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 626.631

Total Results: 15

Enoch v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-07-27T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 95 So. 3d 344, 2012 WL 3047313, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 12275

Snippet: seminal advocacy case.” McCoy v. Stewart, 282 F.3d 626, 631 (9th Cir.2002). The State of Ohio prosecuted Brandenburg

Rainess v. Estate of MacHida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-02-01T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 81 So. 3d 504, 2012 WL 283089, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1335

Snippet: Wassman v. Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co., 797 So.2d 626, 631-32 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)). Thus, the trial court

Zimmerman v. CADE ENTERPRISES, INC.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2010-05-07T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 34 So. 3d 199, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 6284, 2010 WL 1816255

Snippet: Wassman v. Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co., 797 So.2d 626, 631-32 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). Rule 1.240 provides in

Hope v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2005-08-24T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 908 So. 2d 507

Snippet: Court accepted review of Bates v. State, 818 So.2d 626, 631 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. granted 832 So.2d 103 (2002

Rappa v. Island Club West Development, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2004-12-30T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 890 So. 2d 477

Snippet: evidence); Fotomat Corp. of Fla. v. Chanda, 464 So.2d 626, 631 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985) (reversing and remanding where

Bates v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2004-10-21T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 887 So. 2d 1214

Snippet: PER CURIAM. We review Bates v. State, 818 So.2d 626, 631 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002), which certified the following…assistance of counsel claim. Bates v. State, 818 So.2d 626, 631 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). This issue continues to arise

Alexander v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2002-11-14T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 830 So. 2d 899

Snippet: rule 3.850 proceedings. Bates v. State, 818 So.2d 626, 631 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (Allen, C.J., concurring in

Smith v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2002-10-16T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 829 So. 2d 940

Snippet: DCA 2000); see also Bates v. State, 818 So.2d 626, 631 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) ("[W]here such misadvice

Stansel v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2002-08-28T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 825 So. 2d 1007

Snippet: dissenting in part in Bates v. State, 818 So.2d 626, 631 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). Therefore, I would reverse

State v. Adams

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1996-06-28T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 683 So. 2d 517

Snippet: court); see also Sheridan v. Respess, 147 Fla. 626, 631, 3 So.2d 704, 707 (1941) (judgment of court below

Gill v. USX Corp.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1991-11-05T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 588 So. 2d 1035

Snippet: County Council on Aging v. Goldsmith, 500 So.2d 626, 631 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986): For many years permanent

Florida Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Valez

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1987-10-20T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 514 So. 2d 395, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2442, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10687

Snippet: County Council on Aging v. Goldsmith, 500 So.2d 626, 631-632 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), the two terms are essentially

Jutagir v. Marlin

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1984-07-31T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 453 So. 2d 503

Snippet: 356, 360 (1935); McMullen v. McMullen, 122 So.2d 626, 631 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960). The order denying the motion

Woodham v. Williams

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1968-02-21T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 207 So. 2d 320

Snippet: 511, 87 S.Ct. 625, 17 L.Ed.2d 574. [6] F.S. § 626.631(7) and 624.0125(4), F.S.A. [7] Florida State Board

Reid v. Barry

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1927-04-14T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 112 So. 846, 93 Fla. 849

Snippet: Com. Law) 9, 101, 106; Rine v. Wagner,135 Iowa 626, 631; McCloskey v. Doherty, 97 Ken. 300. That the common