Still working: heavy queries on the fallback index can run 20-40 seconds.
Your account
Signed in as—
MCP handle—
Plan—
Your details
Account information only. It is never shown to the AI client you connect, and it is kept apart from
your research — which is not logged at all.
Your MCP token
Tokens are never shown here. To issue one against this same account — claude.ai custom connectors
and ChatGPT developer mode need one — start the activation flow.
It lands on the handle above. Install instructions.
Pro — $30/month
The dedicated fast index: searches run on a machine nobody else queues for, with full-text
highlighted excerpts. Higher MCP limits, and semantic search when it lands.
675.115 Statute of limitations.—An action to enforce a right or obligation arising under this chapter must be commenced within 1 year after the expiration date of the relevant letter of credit or 1 year after the cause of action accrues, whichever occurs later. A cause of action accrues when the breach occurs, regardless of the aggrieved party’s lack of knowledge of the breach.
Fla. Nat. Bk. v. Alfred, Ann Goldstein Found., Inc., 327 So. 2d 110 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976). · cites it 2דThe learned trial judge entered a summary final judgment in favor of appellee holding that F.S. 675.115 and F.S. 672.710 afforded a basis for the award of attorneys' fees although no provision therefor is found in the letter of credit the dishonor of which resulted in the…”
Hamilton Bank, N.A. v. Kookmin Bank, 245 F.3d 82 (2d Cir. 2001). “at 21 (citing Fla Stat.Ann. § 675.115(1)). In Chase Manhattan, we allowed the plaintiff to argue that the district court selected the wrong date for the beginning of the damages period because the plaintiff “raise[d] that argument [on appeal] by way of a challenge to an aspect…”
— 675.115(1) — 1 case
Hamilton Bank, N.A. v. Kookmin Bank, 245 F.3d 82 (2d Cir. 2001). “at 21 (citing Fla Stat.Ann. § 675.115(1)). In Chase Manhattan, we allowed the plaintiff to argue that the district court selected the wrong date for the beginning of the damages period because the plaintiff “raise[d] that argument [on appeal] by way of a challenge to an aspect…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
This Florida statute resource is curated by the lawyer who curates this resource, a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney (Florida Bar No. 39104). For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.