Cases from cite.case.law:

AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION, LOCAL v. CITY OF GAINESVILLE,, 264 So. 3d 375 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . . § 16(a)(1)(E), whereas section 682.20(1)(f), Florida Statutes, specifically allows "an appeal from . . .

T. FELGER, M. D. P. A. v. MOCK,, 65 So. 3d 625 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . vacating an [arbitration] award without directing a rehearing’ is a final appealable order under Section 682.20 . . .

INFOLINK GROUP, INC. a a v. KURZWEG,, 10 So. 3d 201 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Draheim, 898 So.2d 1129, 1130 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (holding that Section 682.20(l)(c), Florida Statutes . . .

JONATHAN M. FRANTZ, M. D. P. A. d b a v. SHEDDEN,, 974 So. 2d 1193 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . award pursuant to section 682.13, Florida Statutes (2004), or to appeal an award pursuant to section 682.20 . . . Code” and because it does not specifically bar any right to appeal, the appeal provisions of section 682.20 . . .

OPEN MRI OF OKEECHOBEE, LLC, S. T. R. v. ALDANA,, 969 So. 2d 589 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . The portion of the Arbitration Code explicitly dealing with appeals, section 682.20(1)(a), Florida Statutes . . . Section 682.20(2) provides that “[t]he appeal shall be taken in the manner and to the same extent as . . . 682.03(3) as broadly as appellants urge would be to nullify the legislative direction given in section 682.20 . . .

PARVIN, v. VALHALLA PROPERTIES ON SAND KEY, LLC, a J. Jo, 949 So. 2d 1167 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . Parvin contends that his appeal is authorized by the provisions of section 682.20(l)(c), Florida Statutes . . .

ALTERRA HEALTHCARE CORPORATION v. L. BRYANT, R. Sr., 937 So. 2d 263 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . from appealing any arbitration decision was unenforceable because it was in contravention of section 682.20 . . .

FRIENDLY HOMES OF THE SOUTH INC. a v. FONTICE, 932 So. 2d 634 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . .]” § 682.20(l)(c), Fla. Stat. (2005). . . .

LOEWENSTEIN, INC. v. DRAHEIM,, 914 So. 2d 1106 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . Service Station Aid, Inc., 651 So.2d 1173 (Fla.1995); see also § 682.13(3), 682.20(1)(e), Fla. . . .

KINKO S, INC. v. PAYNE,, 901 So. 2d 354 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . interlocutory appeal pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9-13 0(a)(3)(C)(iv) and section 682.20 . . .

LOEWENSTEIN, INC. v. DRAHEIM,, 898 So. 2d 1129 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . Although section 682.20(l)(c), Florida Statutes (2004), provides that “[a]n appeal may be taken from . . .

TENET HEALTHCARE CORP. a FMC a a v. MAHARAJ, M. D. a, 859 So. 2d 1209 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . Similarly, although section 682.20 provides for some judicial review in arbitration cases, it carefully . . . limits such review to specified final decisions, none of which include review of discovery orders. § 682.20 . . .

T. A. ENTERPRISES, INC. a v. OLARTE, INC. a, 835 So. 2d 1235 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . Under section 682.20, parties may appeal an arbitration award only in limited circumstances, and courts . . .

HEALTHCOMP EVALUATION SERVICES CORPORATION v. G. O DONNELL,, 817 So. 2d 1095 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . See § 682.20, Fla. Stat. (1999). . . .

AVID ENGINEERING, INC. v. ORLANDO MARKETPLACE LIMITED,, 809 So. 2d 1 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . court has jurisdiction pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(C)(iv), and section 682.20 . . . party has the right to appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(C)(iv), and section 682.20 . . .

K. P. MEIRING CONSTRUCTION, INC. v. NORTHBAY I E, INC., 761 So. 2d 1221 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . See also § 682.20(l)(a), Fla. . . .

E. ULRICH, v. EATON VANCE DISTRIBUTORS, INC. P., 764 So. 2d 731 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . For one thing, section 682.20(2), Florida Statutes (1995), provides that appeals in arbitration matters . . .

NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. PINNACLE MEDICAL, INC. M M v. M M, 753 So. 2d 55 (Fla. 2000)

. . . Under section 682.20, Florida Statutes (1997), parties may appeal an arbitration award only in limited . . . Section 682.20, Florida Statues (1997), provides: (1) An appeal may be taken from: (a) An order denying . . .

JOHNSON, v. S. LEVINE, M. D. H. M. D. M. D. M. D. M. D. M. M. D. J. M. D. M. M. D. d b a d b a d b a d b a, 736 So. 2d 1235 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Section 682.20(l)(c) provides for appellate jurisdiction of orders that deny confirmation of an arbitration . . . See § 682.20(l)(c), Fla. Stat. (1997). . . . Hence, even if section 682.20(l)(c) properly allowed review by appeal of orders granting or denying confirmation . . .

L. CRAWFORD, f k a C. v. DWOSKIN,, 729 So. 2d 520 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Section 57.29, Florida Statutes (1963) is currently found at Section 682.20, Florida Statutes (1997) . . . pointed out by the Fifth District in Health Care Assoc., Inc., the supreme court has not adopted Section 682.20 . . . Big Bend PBA, 703 So.2d at 1069 (holding Section 682.20 invalid). . . .

H. GASSNER, v. BECHTEL CONSTRUCTION, 702 So. 2d 548 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . agreement limits rights to take an appeal of a filial arbitration order to those allowed by section 682.20 . . .

HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATES, INC. v. BREVARD PHYSICIANS GROUP, P. A., 701 So. 2d 118 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . Appellant relies on section 682.20(l)(e)-(e), Florida Statutes, which does provide for appellate review . . .

CITY OF TALLAHASSEE, v. BIG BEND PBA, 703 So. 2d 1066 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . raises a perceived inconsistency between sections 682.15 and 682.16, Florida Statutes (1995) and section 682.20 . . . 682.16 require that a judgment be entered on an order confirming an arbitration award; whereas, section 682.20 . . . appealable “in the manner and to the same extent as from orders or judgments in a civil action.” § 682.20 . . . To the extent that section 682.20(l)(c) could be construed to create such a right, it would be invalid . . .

E. BOYHAN, v. J. MAGUIRE,, 693 So. 2d 659 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . See § 682.20, Fla.Stat. (1995). . . .

GALE GROUP, INC. f k a v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION,, 683 So. 2d 661 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . . § 682.20, Fla.Stat. (1993); AG. Edwards & Sons v. . . .

C. MASON, v. PORSCHE CARS OF NORTH AMERICA,, 621 So. 2d 719 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . See § 682.20, Fla.Stat. (1991). . . .

CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, a v. FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, LODGE NO. L. G., 582 So. 2d 162 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . City’s argument, we conclude that the order under review is not a final appealable order under Section 682.20 . . . vacating an [arbitration] award without directing a rehearing” is a final appealable order under Section 682.20 . . .

In ITULE ITULE v. METLEASE, INC., 114 B.R. 206 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 1990)

. . . The monthly payments consisted of the following sums per month: $682.20 for each Ken-worth Truck; $277.05 . . .

LeBLANC v. UNITED STATES, 732 F. Supp. 709 (E.D. Tex. 1990)

. . . It is thus, ORDERED that plaintiff recover from defendant the amount of $156,-682.20 for past damages . . .

DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD OF ST. JOHNS COUNTY, v. P. TIMONEY,, 524 So. 2d 1129 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . . § 682.20, Fla.Stat. (1987). . §§ 682.12, 682.13, 682.14, Fla.Stat. (1987). . § 682.13(l)(a-e), Fla.Stat . . .

W. RIPPLE M. v. R. PACKARD,, 471 So. 2d 1293 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . See § 682.20(e), Fla.Stat. (1983); see also Corner v. . . .

PAINE, WEBBER, JACKSON CURTIS, INC. v. BENNETT, J. Jr. a, 469 So. 2d 881 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . Paine, Webber’s invitation to review a trial court order denying a motion to compel arbitration, see § 682.20 . . .

ORANGE COUNTY CLASSROOM TEACHERS ASSOCIATION, INC. B. v. SCHOOL BOARD OF ORANGE COUNTY,, 455 So. 2d 634 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . . §§ 682.02 & 682.20, Fla.Stat. (1983); Ogden v. . . .

I. SABATES, M. D. I. M. D. P. A. v. INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CENTERS, INC. a a a d b a Jr., 450 So. 2d 514 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . arbitration, being non-final, must await review Until an appeal is taken from an order under Section 682.20 . . .

AETNA FIRE UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY, a v. M. BROWN,, 392 So. 2d 53 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . It is not appealable under section 682.20(l)(c), Florida Statutes, as the appellant contends, because . . .

C. B. C. v. C. v., 74 T.C. 881 (T.C. 1980)

. . . paid Amount 1967 $5,394.33 Apr. 26, 1968 1968 16,062.27 Mar. 25, 1968 1969 30,000.00 Jan. 15, 1969 $682.20 . . .

VIC POTAMKIN CHEVROLET, INC. v. A. BLOOM K., 386 So. 2d 286 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . Section 682.20(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1979), which purports to create a right to appeal from an interlocutory . . . Section 682.20(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1979), confers a right to appeal from an interlocutory order . . . Appellants claim the right to interlocutory appeal is conferred by the Florida Arbitration Code, Section 682.20 . . . We therefore reject the argument that Section 682.20(l)(a) confers the right to appellate review. . . .

KING v. UNITED STATES, 504 F.2d 1138 (Ct. Cl. 1974)

. . . appraisers’ fees and expenses ($3,300); hydrologist’s fees and expenses ($1,901.06); court reporting fees ($682.20 . . .

A. SCHULTZ, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 295 So. 2d 648 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . Allstate Insurance Company, Fla.App.1964, 162 So.2d 690; § 682.20(1), Fla.Stat., F.S.A. . . .

DAMORA, v. GIVOTOVSKY DAMORA, v. STRESSCON INTERNATIONAL, INC. a, 301 So. 2d 37 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . Section 682.20(1)(a), F.S.A. authorized interlocutory appeal as a means of review of an order denying . . .

HARRIS E. v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, a, 283 So. 2d 147 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

. . . Section 682.20 thereof provides as follows: “Appeals.— (1) An appeal may bo taken from: (a)An order denying . . .

SUN INSURANCE OFFICE, LTD. v. F. PHILLIPS, 230 So. 2d 17 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970)

. . . The order denying the “motion to dismiss and to compel arbitration” is appealable under Section 682.20 . . .

BARTKE S, INC. v. HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY AVIATION AUTHORITY,, 217 So. 2d 885 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

. . . This appeal, pursuant to Florida Statutes § 682.20(1) (a), F.S.A., followed. . . .

v., 60 Cust. Ct. 428 (Cust. Ct. 1968)

. . . covered by the subject protest and entry, and assessed with duty at the rate of 50% ad valorem under Item 682.20 . . .

KAISER INDUSTRIES CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES, 340 F.2d 322 (Ct. Cl. 1965)

. . . to Cold Springs, an expense it would not have incurred had it not been necessary to abandon Hovel*— $682.20 . . .

KAISER INDUSTRIES CORPORATION v. THE UNITED STATES, 169 Ct. Cl. 310 (Ct. Cl. 1965)

. . . to Cold Springs, an expense it would not have incurred had it not been necessary to abandon Hover — $682.20 . . . Erwen expended $682.20 in moving the equipment at Hover to Cold Springs. . . . Cost of moving from Hover to Cold Springs (finding 60)___ 682.20 3. . . . Tile difference between tbis amount and $682.20, the amount hereinabove found and urged by defendant . . .

UNITED STATES v. TUG MANZANILLO, TUG MANZANILLO, v. UNITED STATES, 310 F.2d 220 (9th Cir. 1962)

. . . further earnings in the future and that he has incurred medical and hospital expenses in the sum of $682.20 . . .

UNITED STATES v. THE MANZANILLO,, 190 F. Supp. 229 (D. Or. 1960)

. . . earnings and would lose additional earnings; that he had incurred medical and hospital expenses of $682.20 . . .