Florida Statute 775.089 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XLVI
CRIMES

Chapter 775
GENERAL PENALTIES; REGISTRATION OF CRIMINALS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 775.089

775.089 Restitution.—

(1)(a) In addition to any punishment, the court shall order the defendant to make restitution to the victim for:

1. Damage or loss caused directly or indirectly by the defendant’s offense; and

2. Damage or loss related to the defendant’s criminal episode,

unless it finds clear and compelling reasons not to order such restitution. Restitution may be monetary or nonmonetary restitution. The court shall make the payment of restitution a condition of probation in accordance with s. 948.03. An order requiring the defendant to make restitution to a victim does not remove or diminish the requirement that the court order payment to the Crimes Compensation Trust Fund pursuant to chapter 960. Payment of an award by the Crimes Compensation Trust Fund shall create an order of restitution to the Crimes Compensation Trust Fund, unless specifically waived in accordance with subparagraph (b)1.

(b)1. If the court does not order restitution, or orders restitution of only a portion of the damages, as provided in this section, it shall state on the record in detail the reasons therefor.

2. An order of restitution entered as part of a plea agreement is as definitive and binding as any other order of restitution, and a statement to such effect must be made part of the plea agreement. A plea agreement may contain provisions that order restitution relating to criminal offenses committed by the defendant to which the defendant did not specifically enter a plea.

1. Each person who suffers property damage or loss, monetary expense, or physical injury or death as a direct or indirect result of the defendant’s offense or criminal episode, and also includes the victim’s estate if the victim is deceased, and the victim’s next of kin if the victim is deceased as a result of the offense. The term includes governmental entities and political subdivisions, as those terms are defined in s. 11.45, when such entities are a direct victim of the defendant’s offense or criminal episode and not merely providing public services in response to the offense or criminal episode.

2. The term also includes the victim’s trade association if the offense is a violation of s. 540.11(3)(a)3. involving the sale, or possession for purposes of sale, of physical articles and the victim has granted the trade association written authorization to represent the victim’s interests in criminal legal proceedings and to collect restitution on the victim’s behalf. The restitution obligation in this subparagraph relating to violations of s. 540.11(3)(a)3. applies only to physical articles and does not apply to electronic articles or digital files that are distributed or made available online. As used in this subparagraph, the term “trade association” means an organization founded and funded by businesses that operate in a specific industry to protect their collective interests.

(2)(a) When an offense has resulted in bodily injury to a victim, a restitution order entered under subsection (1) shall require that the defendant:

1. Pay the cost of necessary medical and related professional services and devices relating to physical, psychiatric, and psychological care, including nonmedical care and treatment rendered in accordance with a recognized method of healing.

2. Pay the cost of necessary physical and occupational therapy and rehabilitation.

3. Reimburse the victim for income lost by the victim as a result of the offense.

4. In the case of an offense which resulted in bodily injury that also resulted in the death of a victim, pay an amount equal to the cost of necessary funeral and related services.

(b) When an offense has not resulted in bodily injury to a victim, a restitution order entered under subsection (1) may require that the defendant reimburse the victim for income lost by the victim as a result of the offense.

(3)(a) The court may require that the defendant make restitution under this section within a specified period or in specified installments.

(b) The end of such period or the last such installment shall not be later than:

1. The end of the period of probation if probation is ordered;

2. Five years after the end of the term of imprisonment imposed if the court does not order probation; or

3. Five years after the date of sentencing in any other case.

(c) Notwithstanding this subsection, a court that has ordered restitution for a misdemeanor offense shall retain jurisdiction for the purpose of enforcing the restitution order for any period, not to exceed 5 years, that is pronounced by the court at the time restitution is ordered.

(d) If not otherwise provided by the court under this subsection, restitution must be made immediately.

If the restitution ordered by the court is not made within the time period specified, the court may continue the restitution order through the duration of the civil judgment provision set forth in subsection (5) and as provided in s. 55.10.

(4) If a defendant is placed on probation or paroled, complete satisfaction of any restitution ordered under this section shall be a condition of such probation or parole. The court may revoke probation, and the Florida Commission on Offender Review may revoke parole, if the defendant fails to comply with such order.

(5) An order of restitution may be enforced by the state, or by a victim named in the order to receive the restitution, in the same manner as a judgment in a civil action. The outstanding unpaid amount of the order of restitution bears interest in accordance with s. 55.03, and, when properly recorded, becomes a lien on real estate owned by the defendant. If civil enforcement is necessary, the defendant shall be liable for costs and attorney’s fees incurred by the victim in enforcing the order.

(6)(a) The court, in determining whether to order restitution and the amount of such restitution, shall consider the amount of the loss sustained by any victim as a result of the offense.

(b) The criminal court, at the time of enforcement of the restitution order, shall consider the financial resources of the defendant, the present and potential future financial needs and earning ability of the defendant and his or her dependents, and such other factors which it deems appropriate.

(7)(a) While the primary purpose of restitution is to compensate the victim, it also serves the rehabilitative and deterrent goals of the criminal justice system.

(b) Restitution must be determined on a fair market value basis unless the state, victim, or defendant shows that using another basis, including, but not limited to, replacement cost, purchase price less depreciation, or actual cost of repair, is equitable and better furthers the purposes of restitution.

(c) Any dispute as to the proper amount or type of restitution shall be resolved by the court by the preponderance of the evidence. The court may consider hearsay evidence for this purpose, provided it finds that the hearsay evidence has a minimal indicia of reliability. The burden of demonstrating the amount of the loss sustained by a victim as a result of the offense is on the state attorney. The burden of demonstrating the present financial resources and the absence of potential future financial resources of the defendant and the financial needs of the defendant and his or her dependents is on the defendant. The burden of demonstrating such other matters as the court deems appropriate is upon the party designated by the court as justice requires.

(8) The conviction of a defendant for an offense involving the act giving rise to restitution under this section shall estop the defendant from denying the essential allegations of that offense in any subsequent civil proceeding. An order of restitution hereunder will not bar any subsequent civil remedy or recovery, but the amount of such restitution shall be set off against any subsequent independent civil recovery.

(9) When a corporation or unincorporated association is ordered to make restitution, the person authorized to make disbursements from the assets of such corporation or association shall pay restitution from such assets, and such person may be held in contempt for failure to make such restitution.

(10)(a) Any default in payment of restitution may be collected by any means authorized by law for enforcement of a judgment.

(b) The restitution obligation is not subject to discharge in bankruptcy, whether voluntary or involuntary, or to any other statutory or common-law proceeding for relief against creditors.

(11)(a) The court may order the clerk of the court to collect and dispense restitution payments in any case.

(b) The court may order the Department of Corrections to collect and dispense restitution and other payments from persons remanded to its custody or supervision.

(12)(a) Issuance of income deduction order with an order for restitution.—

1. Upon the entry of an order for restitution, the court shall enter a separate order for income deduction if one has not been entered.

2. The income deduction order shall direct a payor to deduct from all income due and payable to the defendant the amount required by the court to meet the defendant’s obligation.

3. The income deduction order shall be effective so long as the order for restitution upon which it is based is effective or until further order of the court.

4. When the court orders the income deduction, the court shall furnish to the defendant a statement of his or her rights, remedies, and duties in regard to the income deduction order. The statement shall state:

a. All fees or interest which shall be imposed.

b. The total amount of income to be deducted for each pay period.

c. That the income deduction order applies to current and subsequent payors and periods of employment.

d. That a copy of the income deduction order will be served on the defendant’s payor or payors.

e. That enforcement of the income deduction order may only be contested on the ground of mistake of fact regarding the amount of restitution owed.

f. That the defendant is required to notify the clerk of court within 7 days after changes in the defendant’s address, payors, and the addresses of his or her payors.

(b) Enforcement of income deduction orders.—

1. The clerk of court or probation officer shall serve an income deduction order and the notice to payor on the defendant’s payor unless the defendant has applied for a hearing to contest the enforcement of the income deduction order.

2.a. Service by or upon any person who is a party to a proceeding under this subsection shall be made in the manner prescribed in the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure for service upon parties.

b. Service upon the defendant’s payor or successor payor under this subsection shall be made by prepaid certified mail, return receipt requested, or in the manner prescribed in chapter 48.

3. The defendant, within 15 days after having an income deduction order entered against him or her, may apply for a hearing to contest the enforcement of the income deduction order on the ground of mistake of fact regarding the amount of restitution owed. The timely request for a hearing shall stay the service of an income deduction order on all payors of the defendant until a hearing is held and a determination is made as to whether the enforcement of the income deduction order is proper.

4. The notice to payor shall contain only information necessary for the payor to comply with the income deduction order. The notice shall:

a. Require the payor to deduct from the defendant’s income the amount specified in the income deduction order and to pay that amount to the clerk of court.

b. Instruct the payor to implement the income deduction order no later than the first payment date which occurs more than 14 days after the date the income deduction order was served on the payor.

c. Instruct the payor to forward within 2 days after each payment date to the clerk of court the amount deducted from the defendant’s income and a statement as to whether the amount totally or partially satisfies the periodic amount specified in the income deduction order.

d. Specify that, if a payor fails to deduct the proper amount from the defendant’s income, the payor is liable for the amount the payor should have deducted plus costs, interest, and reasonable attorney’s fees.

e. Provide that the payor may collect up to $5 against the defendant’s income to reimburse the payor for administrative costs for the first income deduction and up to $2 for each deduction thereafter.

f. State that the income deduction order and the notice to payor are binding on the payor until further notice by the court or until the payor no longer provides income to the defendant.

g. Instruct the payor that, when he or she no longer provides income to the defendant, the payor shall notify the clerk of court and shall also provide the defendant’s last known address and the name and address of the defendant’s new payor, if known, and that, if the payor violates this provision, the payor is subject to a civil penalty not to exceed $250 for the first violation or $500 for any subsequent violation.

h. State that the payor shall not discharge, refuse to employ, or take disciplinary action against the defendant because of an income deduction order and shall state that a violation of this provision subjects the payor to a civil penalty not to exceed $250 for the first violation or $500 for any subsequent violation.

i. Inform the payor that, when he or she receives income deduction orders requiring that the income of two or more defendants be deducted and sent to the same clerk of court, the payor may combine the amounts that are to be paid to the depository in a single payment as long as he or she identifies that portion of the payment attributable to each defendant.

j. Inform the payor that if the payor receives more than one income deduction order against the same defendant, he or she shall contact the court for further instructions.

5. The clerk of court shall enforce income deduction orders against the defendant’s successor payor who is located in this state in the same manner prescribed in this subsection for the enforcement of an income deduction order against an original payor.

6. A person may not discharge, refuse to employ, or take disciplinary action against an employee because of the enforcement of an income deduction order. An employer who violates this provision is subject to a civil penalty not to exceed $250 for the first violation or $500 for any subsequent violation.

7. When a payor no longer provides income to a defendant, the payor shall notify the clerk of court and shall provide the defendant’s last known address and the name and address of the defendant’s new payor, if known. A payor who violates this provision is subject to a civil penalty not to exceed $250 for the first violation or $500 for a subsequent violation.

History.—s. 1, ch. 77-150; s. 288, ch. 79-400; s. 5, ch. 84-363; s. 2, ch. 88-96; s. 38, ch. 88-122; s. 10, ch. 89-526; s. 2, ch. 92-107; s. 1, ch. 93-37; s. 3, ch. 93-69; s. 19, ch. 94-342; s. 1, ch. 95-160; s. 1187, ch. 97-102; s. 1, ch. 99-358; s. 1, ch. 2012-17; s. 13, ch. 2014-191; s. 1, ch. 2015-132; s. 1, ch. 2021-172.

F.S. 775.089 on Google Scholar

F.S. 775.089 on Casetext

Amendments to 775.089

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 775.089

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 775.089.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 775.089

Total Results: 20

Francisco O. Perez v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-09-04T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: relationship between the offense and the loss. § 775.089, Fla. Stat. (2020). As the state failed to

FRANKLIN v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-07-10T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: relationship to the crime charged). Section 775.089(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2019), provides that the

Sebastian Garcia Lucas v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-05-15T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: § 775.089(1)(c)1., Fla. Stat. (2022) (emphasis added). In Anglin, we interpreted section 775.089(1)(… to’ the crime.” 369 So. 3d at 1170 (quoting § 775.089(1)(c)1., Fla. Stat. (2019)). We distinguished this…the defendants offense . . . .” Id. (quoting § 775.089(1)(c)1., Fla. Stat. (2019)). The SATC satisfies…response to the offense or criminal episode.” See § 775.089(1)(c)1., Fla. Stat. (2022). After the crime, detectives…victim entitled to restitution pursuant to section 775.089(1)(c)1. We thus affirm appellant’s conviction

Kevin Douglas Ray v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-03-27T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: and her children without complying with section 775.089, Florida Statutes (2022). We disagree with Defendant

ASLEYS ACOSTA v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-01-19T00:00:00-08:00

Snippet: of crime and length of incarceration. Compare § 775.089(6)(b), Fla. Stat. (2019) ("The criminal court…resources of the defendant . . . ."), and § 775.089(7) ("The burden of demonstrating the present

KEVAN ANGLIN v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2023-08-09T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: a “direct victim” under section 775.089(1)(c)1. Section 775.089(1)(c)1. also requires a governmental…response to the offense or criminal episode. § 775.089(1)(c)1., Fla. Stat. (2019) (emphasis added). …However, in 2015, the Legislature amended section 775.089 specifically to include governmental entities and…The bill amends the definition of ‘victim’ in s. 775.089(1)(c), F.S., to clarify that the term includes …or criminal episode.”). As amended, section 775.089(1)(c)1. provides that state agencies, such as the

K.J.H., A CHILD vs STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2023-05-05T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: objections, the trial court, relying on section 775.089, Florida Statutes (2022), issued an order granting…challenge to a restitution award under section 775.089, Florida courts have required a finding that ‘the…DCA 2008) (“To order restitution under [section 775.089], the court must find that the loss or damage …attend trial were not recoverable under section 775.089). Here, the victim did not lose any wages

GARDINO MARTINEZ MESA v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2023-02-07T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: of the offense is on the state attorney. See § 775.089(7), Fla. Stat. (2019); Strickland v. State, 746… 2d 1189, 1190 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999) (“[S]ection 775.089(7) contemplates an evidentiary hearing where there…such as the SPCA, can be a “victim” under section 775.089(1)(c).

LINDA WEINREBER BARKER v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2022-11-22T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: of loss by a preponderance of the evidence. § 775.089(7)(c), Fla. Stat. (2021). The defendant relies

ARTHUR SAGER v. MADALINA BLANCO AND RICARDO F. BLANCO

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2022-10-12T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: so ruling, the court cited sections 772.14 and 775.089, Florida Statutes (2020), for the proposition that… been a party in the criminal action. Section 775.089(8), Florida Statutes, which is part of the Florida…, 107 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993) (holding that section 775.089(8), Florida Statutes, “applies to a criminal defendant

ARTHUR SAGER v. MADALINA BLANCO AND RICARDO F. BLANCO

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2022-06-15T00:53:00-07:00

MICHAEL LOVE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2022-02-01T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: court finds a compelling reason not to do so. § 775.089(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2020). In Livingston v. State…by the victim resulting from the offense. See § 775.089(7)(c), Fla. Stat. (2020). Love argues the State… was not corroborated with billing records); § 775.089(7)(c), Fla. Stat. (2020). Despite the State’s claims

STATE OF FLORIDA v. P.C.L., a Child

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2022-01-04T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: So. 2d 822, 824 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (citing § 775.089(7), Fla. Stat. (2019)). For adults, restitution…related to the defendant’s criminal episode.” § 775.089(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2019). Courts have treated the

ROSA ELENA MARTINEZ v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2021-04-28T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: been, had the crime not been committed. See § 775.089, Fla. Stat. (2015). This is accomplished by requiring…offense and is a mandatory sanction under section 775.089(1)(a). That statute provides, in relevant part:… the court as justice requires. . . . § 775.089, Fla. Stat. (2015) (emphasis added). Thus,…State, 689 So. 2d 1061, 1064 (Fla. 1997)); see § 775.089(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2015). Second, the trial court…determining the amount or type of restitution. See §§ 775.089(1)(a), (6)(a), and (7), Fla. Stat. (2015). Third

E.J.A., A CHILD v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2020-08-12T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: similarly to the statute applicable to adults, section 775.089, Florida Statutes. See L.R.L. v. State, 9 So. 3d… 3d 714, 716 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009). Section 775.089(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2019), provides that absent …episode.” “Under the plain language of [section 775.089], the loss or damage to be compensated must be …defendant did not specifically enter a plea.” § 775.089(1)(b)2., Fla. Stat. The state has the burden of

Mark Anthony Tolbert v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-04-22T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: related to the defendant’s criminal episode. § 775.089(1)(a), Fla. Stat. The State has the burden of proving…restitution owed by a preponderance of the evidence. § 775.089(7), Fla. Stat. The amount of restitution ordered…688 So. 2d 913, 915 (Fla. 1997) (referencing § 775.089(1)(a)). Therefore, although the court announced…, the Florida Supreme Court noted that section 775.089(1)(a)’s “directly or indirectly” limitation precluded…offense. 520 So. 2d 276, 277 (Fla. 1988) (“Section 775.089(1)(a) is not ambiguous.”); accord Glaubius, 668

CRICKET KATHLEEN TOOLE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-02-19T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: market value, of many of the items. Section 775.089(7), Florida Statutes, provides: Any dispute… 2 §775.089(7), Fla. Stat. (2018). State v. Hawthorne,…burden of proof is preponderance of the evidence. § 775.089(7), Fla. Stat. (2018). And four, trial courts have…legislative fix by adding the following to section 775.089(7): “The court is not bound by fair market value… A CALL TO THE LEGISLATURE TO REVISE SECTION 775.089, FLORIDA STATUTES, GOVERNING RESTITUTION

S.S. v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-12-14T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 261 So. 3d 704

Snippet: similarly to the adult restitution statute, section 775.089(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2017), which allows a

S.S. v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-12-14T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 261 So. 3d 704

Snippet: similarly to the adult restitution statute, section 775.089(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2017), which allows a

M. P. v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-09-21T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: proceedings after the court orders restitution, see § 775.089(6), Fla. Stat. (2016), but in a juvenile case,…Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (en banc) (noting that section 775.089(6) previously required consideration at the restitution