Arrestable Offenses under F.S. 790.22
M = misdemeanor · F = felony · degree: F=1st S=2nd T=3rd§790.22(2)WEAPON OFFENSEADULT PERMITS UNDER 16 YOA TO POSSESS WEAPONM · 2nd
§790.22(3)WEAPON OFFENSEUNDER 18 YOA UNLAWFUL POSS FIREARMM · 1st
§790.22(3)WEAPON OFFENSEUNDER 18 UNLAWFUL POSSESS FIREARM SUBSQ OFFF · 3rd
§790.22(4a)WEAPON OFFENSEPARENT GUARDIAN ALLOW UNLAWFUL POSS FIREARMF · 3rd
§790.22(5a)WEAPON OFFENSEUNDER 18 YOA UNLAWFUL POSS FIREARMM · 1st
§790.22(5b)WEAPON OFFENSEUNDER 18 UNLAWFUL POSS FIREARM SUBSQ OFFF · 3rd
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
82
cases (
4 in the last 5 years), 1963–2026 · leading case:
State of Florida v. I.j., 258 So. 3d 473 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018).
State of Florida v. I.j., 258 So. 3d 473 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018).
· cites it 17× “We reject the juvenile’s argument that we should analogize section 790.22(9), with section 775.087(1), Florida Statutes (1999).”
M.P. v. State, 682 So. 2d 79 (Fla. 1996).
· cites it 12× “1994), provides that “[t]he provisions of this section are supplemental to all other provisions of law relating to the possession, use, or exhibition of a firearm.”
State of Florida v. Dean Alden Shelley, 176 So. 3d 914 (Fla. 2015).
· cites it 2× “2d at 82 (holding that the Legislature “clearly stated its intent to punish possession of a firearm by a minor in addition to any other firearm-related offenses” by stating that the possession statute is “ ‘supplemental to all other provisions of law relating to the possession,…”
B.O. v. State, 25 So. 3d 586 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).
· cites it 26× “The majority also concludes that the petition for delinquency in this case does not comport with due process because its specific wording cited neither the possible sentencing under section 790.22(2), nor used the express terms of use or possession of a firearm in setting forth…”
TLW v. Soud, 645 So. 2d 1101 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).
· cites it 10× “01(2), and possession of a firearm by a minor, a first degree misdemeanor pursuant to section 790.22(3) and (5). The petitioner failed to appear in court as scheduled but did appear the following day, September 20.”
Shelley v. State, 134 So. 3d 1138 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014).
· cites it 2× “2d at 82 (holding that the legislature explicitly stated its intent to allow multiple punishments by providing “that ‘[t]he provisions of this section are supplemental to all other provisions of law1 ” (quoting § 790.22(7), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1994))), with Gorday v.”
Baldwin v. State, 857 So. 2d 249 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003).
· cites it 4× “01, Florida Statutes (1993), and an adjudication of delinquency for possession of a firearm by a minor in violation of section 790.22(3), Florida Statutes (Supp.”
Bolware v. State, 995 So. 2d 268 (Fla. 2008).
· cites it 2× “Fla. Stat. § 790.22 (5)(a) (expressly makes suspension of driving privileges a part of the penalty for a minor being in a possession of a firearm); Fla.”
Lopez-Vazquez v. State, 931 So. 2d 231 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).
· cites it 4× “01 and possession of a firearm by a minor in violation of section 790.22(3) after he was found in possession of a single weapon.”
State v. J.Z., 957 So. 2d 45 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007).
· cites it 12× “While section 790.22 does not contain any express restriction on the courfis discretion to withhold adjudication, it does contain an express restriction on the court’s discretion to credit a minor with time served before adjudication.”
Lane v. MRA Holdings, LLC, 242 F. Supp. 2d 1205 (M.D. Fla. 2002).
· cites it 2× “See Fla. Stat. § 790.22 ("The use for any purpose whatsoever of BB guns, air or gas-operated guns, or electric weapons or devices, by any minor under the age of 16 years is prohibited unless such use is under the supervision and in the presence of an adult who is acting with the…”
790.22(1): 4 cases
790.22(10)(a): 1 case
790.22(2): 3 cases
B.O. v. State, 25 So. 3d 586 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).
“The majority also concludes that the petition for delinquency in this case does not comport with due process because its specific wording cited neither the possible sentencing under section 790.22(2), nor used the express terms of use or possession of a firearm in setting forth…”
790.22(3): 31 cases
M.P. v. State, 682 So. 2d 79 (Fla. 1996).
“1994), provides that “[t]he provisions of this section are supplemental to all other provisions of law relating to the possession, use, or exhibition of a firearm.”
Baldwin v. State, 857 So. 2d 249 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003).
“01, Florida Statutes (1993), and an adjudication of delinquency for possession of a firearm by a minor in violation of section 790.22(3), Florida Statutes (Supp.”
790.22(4): 2 cases
Bb v. Pjm, 933 So. 2d 57 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006).
790.22(5): 3 cases
790.22(5)(a): 3 cases
790.22(7): 10 cases
State of Florida v. Dean Alden Shelley, 176 So. 3d 914 (Fla. 2015).
“2d at 82 (holding that the Legislature “clearly stated its intent to punish possession of a firearm by a minor in addition to any other firearm-related offenses” by stating that the possession statute is “ ‘supplemental to all other provisions of law relating to the possession,…”
Shelley v. State, 134 So. 3d 1138 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014).
“2d at 82 (holding that the legislature explicitly stated its intent to allow multiple punishments by providing “that ‘[t]he provisions of this section are supplemental to all other provisions of law1 ” (quoting § 790.22(7), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1994))), with Gorday v.”
M.P. v. State, 682 So. 2d 79 (Fla. 1996).
“1994), provides that “[t]he provisions of this section are supplemental to all other provisions of law relating to the possession, use, or exhibition of a firearm.”
Lopez-Vazquez v. State, 931 So. 2d 231 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).
“01 and possession of a firearm by a minor in violation of section 790.22(3) after he was found in possession of a single weapon.”
Baldwin v. State, 857 So. 2d 249 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003).
“01, Florida Statutes (1993), and an adjudication of delinquency for possession of a firearm by a minor in violation of section 790.22(3), Florida Statutes (Supp.”
790.22(8): 2 cases
TLW v. Soud, 645 So. 2d 1101 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).
“01(2), and possession of a firearm by a minor, a first degree misdemeanor pursuant to section 790.22(3) and (5). The petitioner failed to appear in court as scheduled but did appear the following day, September 20.”
790.22(9): 22 cases
B.O. v. State, 25 So. 3d 586 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).
“The majority also concludes that the petition for delinquency in this case does not comport with due process because its specific wording cited neither the possible sentencing under section 790.22(2), nor used the express terms of use or possession of a firearm in setting forth…”
State v. J.Z., 957 So. 2d 45 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007).
“While section 790.22 does not contain any express restriction on the courfis discretion to withhold adjudication, it does contain an express restriction on the court’s discretion to credit a minor with time served before adjudication.”
790.22(9)(a): 18 cases
State of Florida v. I.j., 258 So. 3d 473 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018).
“We reject the juvenile’s argument that we should analogize section 790.22(9), with section 775.087(1), Florida Statutes (1999).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.