Florida Statute 828.17 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XLVI
CRIMES

Chapter 828
ANIMALS: CRUELTY; SALES; ANIMAL ENTERPRISE PROTECTION

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 828.17

828.17 Officer to arrest without warrant.—Any sheriff or any other peace officer of the state, or any police officer of any city or town of the state, shall arrest without warrant any person found violating any of the provisions of ss. 828.08, 828.12, and 828.13-828.16, and the officer making the arrest shall hold the offender until a warrant can be procured, and he or she shall use proper diligence to procure such warrant.

History.—s. 15, ch. 4971, 1901; GS 3401; RGS 5250; CGL 7369; s. 1, ch. 28060, 1953; s. 32, ch. 73-334; s. 1288, ch. 97-102; s. 2, ch. 2002-51; s. 6, ch. 2010-117.

F.S. 828.17 on Google Scholar

F.S. 828.17 on Casetext

Amendments to 828.17

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 828.17

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 828.17.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 828.17

Total Results: 20

JOSEPH BALDINO v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-07-19

Citation: 225 So. 3d 257, 2017 WL 3085326, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10443

Snippet: nia], 386 U.S. [18] at 24, 87 S.Ct. [824] at 828 [17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967)]. Application of the test requires

Cooper v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-12-01

Citation: 68 So. 3d 263, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18326, 2010 WL 4861723

Snippet: California], 386 U.S. [18] at 24, 87 S.Ct. [824] at 828, 17 L.Ed.2d 705 [ (1967) ]. Application of the test

Trepal v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-03-06

Citation: 846 So. 2d 405, 2003 WL 1055207

Snippet: v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 24, 87 S.Ct. 824, 828, 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967), "harmless beyond a reasonable

Brinkley v. County of Flagler

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-10-13

Citation: 769 So. 2d 468, 2000 WL 1513758

Snippet: concur. NOTES [1] See generally Fla. Stat. §§ 828.17 and 933.20 (1997).

Deck v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-03-24

Citation: 653 So. 2d 435, 1995 WL 124353

Snippet: v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 24, 87 S.Ct. 824, 828, 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967). We find that admission of the

Rigsby v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1994-06-29

Citation: 639 So. 2d 132, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 6401, 1994 WL 286998

Snippet: California] 386 U.S. [18] at 24, 87 S.Ct. [824] at 828 [17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967) ]. Application of the test requires

Fricke v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-04-03

Citation: 561 So. 2d 597, 1990 WL 37419

Snippet: Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 87 S.Ct. 824, 828, 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967), and, accordingly, reverse and

Owen v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-03-01

Citation: 560 So. 2d 207, 1990 WL 59408

Snippet: Chapman v. State, 386 U.S. 18, 24, 87 S.Ct. 824, 828, 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967); Martin v. Wainwright. Applying

State v. Lee

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-09-01

Citation: 531 So. 2d 133, 1988 WL 93696

Snippet: California], 386 U.S. 18 at 24, 87 S.Ct. [824] at 828 [17 L.Ed.2d 705]. Application of the test requires

Robinson v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-01-28

Citation: 520 So. 2d 1, 1988 WL 6032

Snippet: Chapman v. State, 386 U.S. 18, 24, 87 S.Ct. 824, 828, 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967); State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d

Abreu v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1987-09-04

Citation: 511 So. 2d 1111, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2150

Snippet: California] 386 U.S. 18 at 24, 87 S.Ct. [824] at 828 [17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967)]. Application of the test requires

Lowry v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1987-08-12

Citation: 510 So. 2d 1196, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1981, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9819

Snippet: California] 386 U.S. [18] at 24, 87 S.Ct. [824] at 828 [17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967)]. Application of the test requires

Holland v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1987-02-05

Citation: 503 So. 2d 1250, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 94

Snippet: v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 24, 87 S.Ct. 824, 828, 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967). Its acceptance is the result

Kokal v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1986-07-17

Citation: 492 So. 2d 1317, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 348

Snippet: v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 24, 87 S.Ct. 824, 828, 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967); State v. Murray, 443 So.2d

R.R. v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-07-30

Citation: 476 So. 2d 218, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1834, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14695

Snippet: v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 24, 87 S.Ct. 824, 828, 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967); in contrast, Richardson questions

RR v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-07-30

Citation: 476 So. 2d 218

Snippet: v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 24, 87 S.Ct. 824, 828, 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967); in contrast, Richardson questions

Hall v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-07-03

Citation: 477 So. 2d 572, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1651

Snippet: v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 24, 87 S.Ct. 824, 828, 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967), the court said: [b]efore a

Knox v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-04-24

Citation: 471 So. 2d 59, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1053

Snippet: v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 24, 87 S.Ct. 824, 828, 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967). During the prosecutor's closing

Crawford v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-03-27

Citation: 473 So. 2d 700, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 814, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13119

Snippet: v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 24, 87 S.Ct. 824, 828, 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967): [bjefore a federal constitutional

Crawford v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-03-27

Citation: 473 So. 2d 700, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 814

Snippet: v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 24, 87 S.Ct. 824, 828, 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967): [b]efore a federal constitutional