Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- REPORT, 214 So. 3d 1290 (Fla. 2017)

. . . Attachment Appendix 19.1 BRIBERY OF A PUBLIC SERVANT § 838.015(1), Fla._Stat. . . . Give if applicable. £ 838.015(2). Fla. . . . Give if applicable. $ 838.015(2), Fla.Stai. . . . adopted in 1981 and amended in 2005 [911 So. 2d 766J and 2017. ■ . 19.2 BRIBERY BY A PUBLIC SERVANT § 838.015 . . .

BATTERSON a k a v. STATE, 217 So. 3d 1062 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Richard Scott Batterson appeals his conviction of bribery in violation of section 838.015(1), Florida . . . Specifically, section 838.015(1) makes it a crime for a public servant to corruptly request, solicit, . . . More precisely, section 838.015(1), Florida Statutes (2013), provides: (1) "Bribery” means corruptly . . .

CZAJKOWSKI, v. STATE, 178 So. 3d 498 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . ppellant was convicted of bribery and unlawful compensation for official behavior pursuant to sections 838.015 . . . 1) and 838.016(1), Florida Statutes (1977) — Appellant’s vagueness challenge fails because sections 838.015 . . .

ELLISON, v. STATE, 132 So. 3d 291 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . Marlon Anthony Ellison challenges his conviction for bribery by a public servant in violation of section 838.015 . . . The defendant argues that he cannot be convicted for a violation of section 838.015 because he was not . . . Section 838.015 makes it a second degree felony for a “public servant” to accept pecuniary benefit given . . . for the purpose of influencing such public servant in the performance of his duties. § 838.015(1), ( . . . As it would be a crime and a violation of section 838.015(1) for a corrections officer at a state prison . . .

STATE v. FLANSBAUM- TALABISCO,, 121 So. 3d 568 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . Section 838.015(1), Florida Statutes (2010), contains the definition for bribery, the second count against . . . discretion of a public servant, in violation of a public duty, or in performance of a public duty. § 838.015 . . . In 1974, the Florida Legislature enacted section 838.015, which defined the crime of bribery: “Bribery . . . discretion of a public servant, in violation of a public duty, or in performance of a public duty. § 838.015 . . .

STATE v. FERNANDEZ,, 927 So. 2d 939 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . property offenses, forgery, bribery, and unlawful compensation in violation of sections 895.03(3), 831.01, 838.015 . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES NO., 911 So. 2d 766 (Fla. 2005)

. . . reasonably be expected to result in physical or mental injury to a child]. 19.1 BRIBERY OF PUBLIC SERVANT § 838.015 . . . an act to be done if and when [he] [she] actually assumes office. 19.2 BRIBERY BY PUBLIC SERVANT § 838.015 . . . The court now instructs you that a (office of defendant) is a public servant. § 838.015(2), Fla. . . .

NICOR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION a k a v. EL PASO CORPORATION f k a El, 318 F. Supp. 2d 1160 (S.D. Fla. 2004)

. . . . § 838.015, Fla. Stat.; 18 U.S.C. § 201. . . . discretion of a public servant, in violation of a public duly, or in performance of a public duty.” § 838.015 . . .

AGAN, v. VAUGHN,, 119 F.3d 1538 (11th Cir. 1997)

. . . . § 838.015(1) (West 1994) (“ ‘Bribery’ means corruptly to give, offer, or promise to any public servant . . .

DONNELLY, v. STATE, 693 So. 2d 125 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . Section 838.015, Florida Statutes, makes no distinction between a bribe and an offer to make a bribe. . . . Like many other bribery statutes, section 838.015, Florida Statutes, includes an offer to make a bribe . . .

WERNER a k a v. HICKEY,, 920 F. Supp. 1257 (M.D. Fla. 1996)

. . . The acts charged against the petitioner are punishable under Florida Statute § 838.015 (bribery) and . . .

M. GILBERT, v. STATE, 593 So. 2d 597 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . Defendant appeals his conviction for bribery of a public servant, § 838.015, Fla. Stat. (1991). . . .

UNITED STATES v. KOTVAS, Jr. H. a k a,, 941 F.2d 1141 (11th Cir. 1991)

. . . . § 838.015, is the appropriate statute for the basis of a predicate act under RICO. . . .

UNITED STATES v. ITALIANO,, 894 F.2d 1280 (11th Cir. 1990)

. . . relating to Cable Television Franchise Agreement No. 80-563, chargeable under Florida Statutes, Section 838.015 . . .

M. MERCKLE, v. STATE, 541 So. 2d 1312 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . . § 838.015(1), Fla.Stat. (1981). . § 838.016(2), Fla.Stat. . § 839.11, Fla.Stat. (1981). . . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES, 543 So. 2d 1205 (Fla. 1989)

. . . law enforcement authorities— 837.05 None None False official statements— 837.06 None None Bribery — 838.015 . . .

STATE v. GONZALEZ,, 528 So. 2d 1356 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . The bribery statute, section 838.015(1), Florida Statutes (1985), prohibits any payment intended to influence . . .

M. MERCKLE, v. STATE, 529 So. 2d 269 (Fla. 1988)

. . . . § 838.015(3), Fla.Stat. (1985). . . . The jury convicted Merckle of four offenses: bribery, § 838.015(1), Fla.Stat. (1981); receiving unlawful . . . The crime of bribery is defined by the legislature in section 838.015(1), Florida Statutes (1985): “Bribery . . .

STATE v. P. HOPE,, 529 So. 2d 275 (Fla. 1988)

. . . A jury convicted Hope of bribery (subsection 838.015(1), Florida Statutes (1981)) and of giving, offering . . .

J. SARDELLA, v. STATE, 526 So. 2d 918 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . public trust is an inherent component of the crime of Bribery by a Public Servant, Florida Statutes, § 838.015 . . .

STATE v. LOPEZ,, 522 So. 2d 997 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . Lopez was subsequently charged with seven violations of section 838.015(1), Florida Statutes (1985). . . . The statute reads in relevant part: 838.015 Bribery.— (1) "Bribery” means corruptly to give, offer, or . . . discretion of a public servant, in violation of a public duty, or in performance of a public duty. § 838.015 . . .

UNITED STATES v. CASAMAYOR, UNITED STATES v. KEY, R. E. M., 837 F.2d 1509 (11th Cir. 1988)

. . . . § 838.015. . . . Standard Jury Instruction setting out the specific elements involved in proving a violation of Fla.Stat. § 838.015 . . . Thus, the district court’s charge, which included a definition of Fla.Stat. § 838.015, accurately stated . . .

UNITED STATES v. ITALIANO,, 837 F.2d 1480 (11th Cir. 1988)

. . . individuals and entities indicted, the indictment quoted certain relevant statutes, one of which was Section 838.015 . . . Agreement No. 80-563_” Such conduct, the indictment alleged, was chargeable under Florida Statutes, Section 838.015 . . . At all times material herein, Florida Statute § 838.015 provided: (1)“Bribery” means corruptly to give . . . relating to Cable Television Franchise Agreement No. 80-563; chargeable under Florida Statutes, Section 838.015 . . . relating to Cable Television Franchise Agreement No. 80-563; chargeable under Florida Statutes, Sections 838.015 . . .

M. MERCKLE, v. STATE, 512 So. 2d 948 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . Merckle, for bribery in violation of section 838.015(1), Florida Statutes (1981), receiving unlawful . . .

P. HOPE, v. STATE, 508 So. 2d 425 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . and sentences imposed after a jury convicted him for the offenses of bribery, a violation of section 838.015 . . .

L. GARRETT, v. STATE, 508 So. 2d 427 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . Garrett was convicted after a jury trial of the offenses of bribery, a violation of section 838.015(1 . . . Section 838.015(1), Florida Statutes (1981). . . .

BOTT, v. STATE, 492 So. 2d 722 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . Sections 838.015 and 838.016, Florida Statutes (1983), the specific statutes under which appellant was . . .

UNITED STATES v. H. TISON, Jr., 780 F.2d 1569 (11th Cir. 1986)

. . . Charles Frank Bean III relating to Zoning Application No. 80-45; chargeable under Florida Statute Section 838.015 . . .

THE FLORIDA BAR, v. DENKER,, 479 So. 2d 738 (Fla. 1985)

. . . criminal action, respondent pled nolo contendré to, and was convicted of, violating Florida Statutes 838.015 . . .

BRICKER, v. STATE, 462 So. 2d 556 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . By this appeal, Daniel Bricker challenges his conviction of bribery [§ 838.015, Fla. . . .

TRIBUNE COMPANY v. L. GREEN, Jr. E., 440 So. 2d 484 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . Count 4 charged that Judge Leon violated section 838.015(1), Florida Statutes, by accepting gambling . . .

STATE v. SAAD,, 429 So. 2d 757 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . trial judge granted a Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.190(c)(4) motion to dismiss the resulting bribery charges, Sec. 838.015 . . .

P. SAVOIE, v. STATE, 401 So. 2d 1138 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . Savoie was adjudicated guilty of the offense of bribery of a police officer in violation of section 838.015 . . .

HOBERMAN, v. STATE, 400 So. 2d 758 (Fla. 1981)

. . . appellant was convicted of bribery and unlawful compensation for official behavior pursuant to sections 838.015 . . . Appellant’s vagueness challenge fails because sections 838.015(1) and 838.016(1) convey a sufficiently . . . I agree that sections 838.015(1) and 838.-016(1) are not unconstitutionally vague or overbroad and that . . .

W. TRESVANT, Sr. v. STATE, 396 So. 2d 733 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . Violations of §§ 838.015, 838.016 and 777.-04(3), Fla.Stat. (1975), respectively. . . . .

TRUSHIN, v. STATE, 384 So. 2d 668 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . The significantly amended version of this statute is now Section 838.015, Florida Statutes (1979). . . .

STATE v. NAPOLI, Jr., 373 So. 2d 933 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . strained judicial attempts to interpret this principle of law, the legislature enacted what is now Section 838.015 . . . Appellee having allegedly attempted what was apparently a criminal offense under Section 838.015, we . . .

STATE v. GIARDINO,, 363 So. 2d 201 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . other and with other persons to commit one or more felonies, to wit: BRIBERY, in violation of Section 838.015 . . . object of the charged conspiracy, namely, whether it was to violate (a) the bribery statute [Fla.Stat. § 838.015 . . .

C. WATKINS, v. STATE, 363 So. 2d 575 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . Watkins was charged by information in two counts with: (1) bribery [§ 838.015, Fla. . . .

STATE v. N. SUNE, 360 So. 2d 1128 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . sua sponte entered an order requiring the state to elect between the counts of bribery under Section 838.015 . . .

STATE v. W. TRESVANT, Sr., 359 So. 2d 524 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . and unauthorized compensation for official behavior, in violation respectively of Sections 777.04(3); 838.015 . . .

J. C. BENEFIELD, v. STATE, 351 So. 2d 56 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . in violation of Section 838.01, Florida Statutes (1973), and the other count in violation of Section 838.015 . . .